| | #1 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | Recoil Operated Actions (WARNING: Involves Calculus based Physics)
Ok, I'm trying to figure out exactly how recoil operated guns actually work and have hit a point of confusion. I assumed that the momentum of the bullet (integral of force with respect to time) was the same as the bolt, that the bolt then recoiled into a spring. I assumed that the kinetic energy of the bolt carrier was transferred into the spring over the length of the action. Calculating all this out to find the spring constant, it looks like it would take two hundred pounds of force to work the action. So I must be missing something somewhere. I've heard terms like "mass delayed blowback" and wonder what other elements might be involved. I'm familiar with the roller-delayed blowback system used in my HK, but it's the simpler ones that are baffling me. Doesn't look that complicated. Here's what I was trying to work with: Bullet mass * velocity = Bullet momentum = Bolt momentum Bolt momentum/bolt mass = bolt velocity (Bolt velocity)^2 * mass / 2 = bolt energy Bolt energy = spring energy = spring constant / 2 * (x2^2-x1^2) Distance between x1 and x2 is the length of the action. Calculating for a 45 ACP 230gr at 500m/s 4 kg*m/s momentum Divided by 0.25kg bolt mass (about half a pound) = 16m/s m*v^2 / 2 = 32J of kinetic energy KE=SE (spring energy) = K / 2 * (0.1m^2 - 0.05m^2) <-- (change in compression of the spring) Spring constant K turned out to be 8533 N/m Meaning holding it at the 0.1m (10cm, ~4in) point would take 853N, or nearly 200lb. Anyone know where I went wrong? I guess the greater question is WHY??? Well I wanna build one. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Cocoa Florida
Posts: 9,088
|
You think in a pool way too deeb for me to tred in... The high points use a blow back design with the bolt delayed by weight and spring tension....So you got to factor the sprin weight (?) into your calculations....Maybe the gun smith form or Wolff Gun Springs could help you out..I figure you need only about 1/100th os a second delay on the action for the bullet to exit the barrel...maybe the mass and spring resistance keeps the body at rest..since it prefers to remain at rest long enough for the bullet to exit before the force causes the mass (bolt and spring) to move.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
Way I've been taught, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. So if a bullet is forced forward, the bolt is likewise forced back. If the bolt locks, like in every other kind of gun, it pushes the whole bolt back. But if it doesn't lock, such as in a recoil operated semi auto, every bit of force that pushes the bullet forward will push the bolt back. Now maybe some of the energy/pressure/momentum or other stuff goes somewhere else, I dunno. Or maybe the momentum of the bullet itsn't the thing to go by. Maybe the thing to do is to buy a Hi-point and do some measurements, then maybe fudge it from there. Potential problem there is with patent rights.
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 172
|
BattleRifleG3 that gives new meaning to higher education. I must apoligize I thought you were going somewhere else yesterday had my chain yanked at work way to much. As for the project the math is beyond me. I'd have to stick with the tried and true method of trail and error. Good luck to you in your quest.
__________________ " Without proper weaponry the hunter will become the hunted" |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 2,382
|
He left out a few items, such as the friction of the barrel, the friction of the chamber, and the momemtum of the gas itself.
__________________ "Gee, Wally, Eddie Haskel's mom puts out!" Last edited by Klaus; 04-27-2002 at 01:53 AM. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NJ
Posts: 28
|
Pull trigger, listen for bang, check intended target....come on guys!
__________________ Gun control is hitting 'em consistently! |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member ![]() |
Engineers! gotta love 'em. I work with several, very book smart but honestly worry me when I see one crossing the street. Not trying to fuel a silly fire but this made sense to me. Source: Ruger 10/22 owners manual. When the trigger is pulled the hammer is released and strikes the rear of the firing pin. The front end of the firing pin indents the cartrige case rim and ignites the priming compound inside the rim. The flame from the priming compound ignites the powder in the cartrige case and a great volume of gas is instantly generated. the high pressure gas acts on the interior of the cartige case in all directions. Because the bullet offers the least resistance it begins to move out of the cartrige case and down the bore. The bolt, which has also been subjected to the "push" of the gas acting on the inside of the cartrige case head, moves rearward, extracting and ejecting the fired cartrige case, at the same time cocking the hammer and compressing the recoil spring, etc. as described above. now, that my coffee is cold,,,,,,,,,,,,,:smash:
__________________ Proud member of the"Last Minute Hunt Club" Why decide today when we ain't goin' til tomorrow |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
Yep, but the big question is "how fast" and "How heavy". "Real fast" and "real heavy" don't work out well. The problem I'm dealing with is that it looks like we're not strong enough to work the actions. But hopefully I'll learn how this all works out.
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 37
|
i think your main problem is that a 230 grain 45 won't go anywhere near 500 m/s. That would be about 1650 fps. A typical 230 grain 45 only has about half this velocity. 800 fps or so.
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
I checked my numbers, and found I'd been using the energy in Joules instead of the velocity in m/s. Duhhh... Using the right numbers, I brought it down to about 70lb necessary to cock it. Now granted, the spring doesn't absorb all the energy, the bolt does hit a buffer... But how much of the energy is absorbed by the buffer and by the spring? And how much of the bullet's momentum is really imparted into the bolt? That is the question...
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 37
|
also i think there may be a mistake in your spring equation. Should it be (x2-x1)^2 instead of x2^2-x1^2? A typical 45 spring is about 16-17 lb. That should give you something to shoot for. Just a little help from a fellow engineering student who likes to play with guns |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 37
|
Actually idealy i don't think the bolt should hit a buffer. The spring alone should stop it. A true 1911 does not have a buffer. Some people add them as aftermarket parts, but they should not really be needed if the proper spring is being used.
|
| | |
| | #17 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
Ok, the spring roughly accounts for about a third of the energy I calculated for the bolt carrier. I think I've figured something else out... Maybe this is what Klaus was saying, but how about the energy lost to friction as the case slides back through the chamber? It would throw everything off though, as it would allow less of the bullet's momentum to be imparted to the bolt. And to calculate this, I'd need a friction constant. With chamber pressure, I'd figure out the normal force of the case on the chamber, then use the friction constant to find the frictional force... But the pressure would change as the the powder burned up and the bullet moved down the barrel. I can smell the Calculus already... A differential equation... Which is what I need to be studying presently.
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf Last edited by BattleRifleG3; 04-28-2002 at 09:11 PM. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Tampa
Posts: 7,191
|
Been a while since I checked this forum out,must say it has shrunken a bit! As far as this discussion seems to be going I suggest that it is inertia that one must consider when dealing with blow-back firearms.Enjoy all!:nod: :nod: :nod:
__________________ USAF '62-'66 ![]() . |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
Also known as mass. Though some people apply it to momentum too. Energy is absorbed and transferred. I think the big problem is finding where all the energy goes.
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: No where
Posts: 181
|
Well what I think is most of it is held back by friction. And the bullets get out the barrel before the preasure is right for the action to open. I have seen pictures of a 1911 type pistole being fired and the bullet was 4-6" out of the muzzle, and the action was just starting to open. In a 22 auto loader I know that the ruger mark 2 is far more efficiant than a revolver with same barrel length.
|
| | |