I need a picture

Dennis · 05-21-2004, 06:42 PM

Has anyone ever changed barrels on a makarov?
Fac has replacement barrels in .32naa caliber and I have been asked about it
There was a "barrel pressing tool" that presses out the original barrel and pressed in the replacement.
the fitment that accepts the barrel on a Makarov is an interference fit with a pin.
I need a pic of the tool so if I need to I can make one.
Has anyone done this procedure?
are there any tricks or complications?

thanks guys

BattleRifleG3 · 05-21-2004, 09:18 PM

Never heard of that round. Sounds interesting.

Dennis · 05-22-2004, 04:15 AM

I dont know much G is is supposedly a 9mm mak necked down to .32
Same oal
90 grn bullet at 1100fps
Makarov.com has some info.

jarcp · 05-22-2004, 02:20 PM

Personally I'd prefer the .363 Bullet over the smaller .32. Energy wise, the 32NAA has 242Ft-Lbs and our 95g XTP-HP Mak round has 233Ft-Lbs, and our 90g GDHP has 242Ft-Lbs. So your energy is the same with a 90g Bullet, but you get a bigger hole. Granted the .32NAA has less recoil, or at least less perceived recoil. But to me the Makarov (a true Mak, not a FEG) does not have enough recoil to justify the .32NAA. Just my two cents.

BattleRifleG3 · 05-22-2004, 05:31 PM

I too would go for the larger diameter, though I'd think about it if ballistics were good, ie anything like a 7.62x25mm.

Shane · 05-23-2004, 07:05 AM

I think you will find the tool at makarov.com.

There has been much discussion of the .32NAA at www.gunboards.com (makarov forum).

Regards,
Shane

Dennis · 05-24-2004, 12:12 AM

Yea, I was trying to not spend the money on it

05-21-2004, 06:42 PM	#1
Dennis Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Texas Posts: 1,877	I need a picture Has anyone ever changed barrels on a makarov? Fac has replacement barrels in .32naa caliber and I have been asked about it There was a "barrel pressing tool" that presses out the original barrel and pressed in the replacement. the fitment that accepts the barrel on a Makarov is an interference fit with a pin. I need a pic of the tool so if I need to I can make one. Has anyone done this procedure? are there any tricks or complications? thanks guys __________________ Submitted with respect to all

05-21-2004, 09:18 PM	#2
BattleRifleG3 Super Moderator Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Western PA Posts: 11,401 Images: 13	Never heard of that round. Sounds interesting. __________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf

05-22-2004, 04:15 AM	#3
Dennis Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Texas Posts: 1,877	I dont know much G is is supposedly a 9mm mak necked down to .32 Same oal 90 grn bullet at 1100fps Makarov.com has some info. __________________ Submitted with respect to all

05-22-2004, 02:20 PM	#4
jarcp Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: OKC, OK Posts: 253	Personally I'd prefer the .363 Bullet over the smaller .32. Energy wise, the 32NAA has 242Ft-Lbs and our 95g XTP-HP Mak round has 233Ft-Lbs, and our 90g GDHP has 242Ft-Lbs. So your energy is the same with a 90g Bullet, but you get a bigger hole. Granted the .32NAA has less recoil, or at least less perceived recoil. But to me the Makarov (a true Mak, not a FEG) does not have enough recoil to justify the .32NAA. Just my two cents. __________________ Reed's Ammunition & Research 1209 SW 129th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73170 www.reedsammo.com info@reedsammo.com

05-22-2004, 05:31 PM	#5
BattleRifleG3 Super Moderator Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Western PA Posts: 11,401 Images: 13	I too would go for the larger diameter, though I'd think about it if ballistics were good, ie anything like a 7.62x25mm. __________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf

05-23-2004, 07:05 AM	#6
Shane Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 45	Mak 2 .32NAA Conversion I think you will find the tool at makarov.com. There has been much discussion of the .32NAA at www.gunboards.com (makarov forum). Regards, Shane

05-24-2004, 12:12 AM	#7
Dennis Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Texas Posts: 1,877	Yea, I was trying to not spend the money on it __________________ Submitted with respect to all