Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > .22/rimfire

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-18-2005, 12:16 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Talking Ruger 10/22

I was wondering if anyone had the Ruger 10/22 standard carbine stainless. I am looking to purchase one. Just wondering if there has been any problems w/ it.(excessive jamming) I have had no trouble w/ Rugers in the past. However all Remington .22's I have fired jammed much to frequently. I appreciate all input.
crazymudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 01:16 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
NRAJOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 19,043
Images: 3
I've had mine for over 7 yrs...never a problem....
Have a Silver Simmon's 4x scope on it...very accurate...very fun...
You can't go wrong with ANY 10/22....all kinds of aftermarket parts for them too...
Even a "Krinker Plinker" kit to turn 'em into mini AK's...
NRAJOE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 03:19 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: socal
Posts: 1,833
You might want to get just a receiver and trigger group and build on it. Cheaper and a lot (if not most) people end up replacing the stock/barrel. I am toying with the idea of building one up with the 17hm2 barrel/bolt combo.
gunssb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 04:42 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 156
Heck, buy two and get the gatlin gun kit
fordruid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 05:09 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
jerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,871
Images: 9
Blog Entries: 1
Got mine in '89 carbon steel. Has been nothing but an excellent performer.
__________________
I'm a down home back woods redneck
jerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 07:48 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
practical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, LA/Casper, WY
Posts: 736
I bought the all weather 10/22 in 2001. The magazine that came with it was prone to jamming. So I got another and its been flawless since. A $35 leapers scope made a big difference. It now also sports a folding butler creek stock and a pile of 25rd mags. I can't do anything but sing its praises as a fantastic plinker/squirrel gun.
__________________
Eric

"The secret to life is honesty and fair dealing, if you can fake that you've got it made"
practical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 09:47 PM   #7
Member
 
CleanCut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 77
I love my 10/22. No problems at all with it. My Rem 597 use to jam until Rem redesigned the magazine. I bought 2 mags and have had no jams with it since . Out of the box, the Rem was the more accurate of my two.
CleanCut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 10:24 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Johan Malan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 302
Got a 10/22 now for about 4months and have put way over 2000 rounds throug it had one or two jams but not complaining about it
Johan Malan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2005, 10:49 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
practical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, LA/Casper, WY
Posts: 736
One day I may even spend a few bucks to improve the trigger, but its adequte the way it is really. Squirrels inside 50yds are dog food typically.
__________________
Eric

"The secret to life is honesty and fair dealing, if you can fake that you've got it made"
practical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 05:45 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
:flame: Thanks for all the input. I originally thought the blued barrel would be fine but for a reasonable amount more I can get stainless. However, I do want a wood stock as comes with the Ruger standard carbine stainless. I understand that with synthetic, I won't have to worry about scratches etc. but I'm not at all rough and I like the look and feel of wood. Plus the extra weight helps aim.(for me at least) Thanks again.
crazymudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 05:49 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Ctwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 344
Yep, a friend has one, we go out to the range and rapid fire over 1000 rnds at a time...not one jam...good thing he has about 20 clips, 25 rnds each...
Ctwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2005, 07:39 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Father Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 374
Images: 2
I bought my blued 10/22 in the early eighties. It has never jammed, and with the scope on it it is always right on at 100 yds.
Father Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 11:06 AM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Thanks again for all of the replies. I just wanted to say that I purchased the k10/22-22 model. It has the 22 inch stainless barrel and it is much more accurate than any other .22 I have shot. This particular model is made for accurate, rapid, and distant shooting. The trigger is extremely soft, which I really like. I was considering a scope, but the open sites work great. Bury the front sight in the notch and its close range and put the notch in the upper part of the notch and it is accurate at 100 yds. It works great. I will say so far I am impressed by Rugers quality and on its first day of shooting it killed 7 armadillos.
Thanks for all of the input. It certainly helped decide.
crazymudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 02:57 PM   #14
Moderator
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 10,208
Sounds similar to my "Wally Mart Special" - 22" Stainless barrel with rifle-type wood stock. I like it, though it took a few hundred rounds to break in and shoot a decent group. I refinished the birch stock blonde (hate Ruger's proprietary finish) and did a basic trigger polish and new spring job, added a Simmons 3-9X40 scope and rings in silver, to match the rifle.
The longer LOP of the stock fits me better than the carbine.
__________________
Moderator of: AR15/M16, M14/M1A, New/Beginning Shooters and Militaria/Collectables.
Big Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 03:34 PM   #15
ash
Senior Member
 
ash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 934
Images: 3
http://img308.imageshack.us/img308/2310/r10224jj.jpg
Here's mine.
Never had a problem with it.
ash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 06:12 PM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Mine is a walnut stock. I'll try to get a picture of it posted.
crazymudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 01:45 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Johan Malan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 302
I have mine in a blued barrle,everything standard with a 4x32 nikko stirling scope and have shot pop cans at 100yards with it missed most of the time but was no fault of the rifle. Now I got to thinkin', would a 22lr kill gophers at 100? If so I better get me a bigger scope before all this white chit (snow) melts!!
Johan Malan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 02:14 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
practical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, LA/Casper, WY
Posts: 736
Yeah it'll kill gophers at 100yds. Especially if you use something like CCI Stingers. A 3x9 scope and a trigger job will do wonders.
__________________
Eric

"The secret to life is honesty and fair dealing, if you can fake that you've got it made"
practical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005, 10:52 PM   #19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
http://www.snapfish.com/share/p=1673...=SYE/otsi=SALBMine will kill gophers at 100 yds. open sited. With the 22 inch barrel it is extremely accurate. Soft trigger also. Here is the pic. By the way, the model is Ruger k10/22-22.
crazymudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005, 10:58 PM   #20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Sorry; not the greatest pic.
crazymudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ruger, 1022

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.


[Output: 101.79 Kb. compressed to 93.38 Kb. by saving 8.41 Kb. (8.26%)]