| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
| best value .22 semi-auto pistol ? Who makes a reasonably priced American made .22 semi-auto pistol that will accept most any LR ammo without jamming? Last edited by nonunion; 02-27-2008 at 07:52 PM. Reason: addtl. info |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,157
| Ruger Mark series.
__________________ Guns: they are like baseball cards except they are cool and you can kill things with em. -Billy |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Macon County, MO
Posts: 17
| I bought a Beretta U22 Neos in December. Kind of an impact purchase, but I am extremely happy. Will fire cheap ammo as fast as you can pull the trigger, and no jamming. Only thing that I dislike, is that it comes with a factory rail and it was hard to find a holster to put it in. Away, I love it. I bought it new from my FFL and bought it well worth the money. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Listen to yur Inner Hippo ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: South east Wisconsin
Posts: 3,454
| Can't go wrong with the Ruger. Tried and true. Had one, loved it. I now own a S&W 22a and it is a sweet little gun. Very reliable and very accurate as well. About 100 cheaper than the Ruger.
__________________ "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (If all else fails play dead) |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,269
| i would only trust the rugers, every other resonably priced semiauto are crap from my exprience |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 586
| You can't go wrong with a Ruger Mark series.
__________________ The difference between a hot dog and a weenie is a fine line..... |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,897
| Ruger and Browning make great handguns. I wouldn't count out the S&W 22A either: Product: Model 22A Pistol I've never shot one, but I've heard great things about accuracy and reliability. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Thor's Hammer ![]() | Great advice from all. I have to say the Browning Buckmark Camper or the Ruger MK III. Both outstanding 22's! The Browning is easier to D&A.
__________________ Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 43
| Browning Buck Mark would my top choice, followed closely by Ruger Mark series. Buck Marks strip down a bit easier for cleaning. We've got a Buck Mark 4" Micro URX, and just purchased a Buck Mark 5.5" SS slab-side (3 day wait). Last edited by jmichna; 02-28-2008 at 01:23 PM. Reason: Added info. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 209
| I like my Ruger MKII target tapered heavy barrel. The Browning Buck Mark always shot great. The Colt and Smith were ones I should have checked out too. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 614
| In the mid seventies I bought my first handgun, just out of college I found a new Mark 1 Ruger for $75 and short tapered barrel. It was so much fun to shoot and I believe it was the gun that set the record for most consecutive shots without a jamb. Could be wrong on that but like this forum is telling you Ruger Mark series is great. Sold it for some reason (probably that $6000 salary) but now I have a government Mark 2. Same thing- it's a blast to shoot. Here's some advice: If you don't want to pay what they're asking for a Mark 3 Ruger today you had better not shoot it because you'll fit it in your budget somehow. About a year ago I met a guy who's a good friend now and I told him that if you shoot this Mark 2 you'll have to have one. He does and I think it's the Mark 3 Stainless fluted barrel. My brother in law has the Browning Buckmark and loves it. Last edited by Sooner Shooter; 03-01-2008 at 07:55 AM. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
Posts: 12
| GET A BUCKMARK, Ruger's just seem a little hard to put back together. I get calls all the time to put them back together. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 144
| I wouldn't say the Ruger is difficult to put back together once you've done it several times. The first time, unless you have someone to show you the tricks, will frustrate you to no end. Once you do it once, do it a few times back to back and you'll never have a problem. I remember taking my newly purchased, used (no manual included) mark II back to the shop where I purchased it in a paper bag. I felt really stupid until the shopowner told me that I wasn't the first and wouldn't be the last. Took it home and did it myself a few times back to back and never had another problem. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Traverse City, Mi.
Posts: 39
| Majorly Pumped I can't wait!!!! I ordered a MKIII Cocobolo Stainless Hunter today from M.C. Sports for $ 464.00 + 6% I'am so pumped; I can't wait till Friday. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Somewhere out there
Posts: 167
| ruger 22/45 with bull barrel |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cobra Command Headquarters
Posts: 810
| Ruger, absolutely. Get the 6" bull barrel, people will think you are the best marksman in the world, you can close your eyes and hit a fly a mile away, they're that easy to shoot. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: BETWEEN TN & KY
Posts: 774
| If you like CZ's or their style then a CZ 75 Kadet. Very nice semi auto pistols.
__________________ Have a nice day! |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 203
| Those are cool. I bought one "used" from a dealer. The previous owner fired 100 shots and then decided he would rather have a SW 41. It is lighter than it looks because of the barrel flutes and actually seems less front-heavy than the shorter barrel model without flutes. It has HiViz sights with three different size beards in each red and green. It has a target crown an is all stainless. A real tack-driver too and less than half the price of a SW 41. |
| | |