| | #21 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,360
| I like Federal Premium Personal Defense Hydra-Shok JHP ammo. They have some great impact tests... I use the 90 Grain in my .380. Here is the website: Federal Premium Ballistics
__________________ "Minimum wage, minimum effort." "Never underestimate the power of stupidity." ~Me |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,690
| Aguila 117 gr in .45 is fast and accurate. You can show that you used the softest load possible. They are 20.99 a 20 pack. My springer Champ likes them. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | Glad you agree with me Deersniper...They are Great , I just wish they were cheaper...
__________________ You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM! |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 3
| I always thought the heavier (and therefore slower) bullets not only imparted more energy to the target but the slower rounds also minimized the danger of overpenetration. At least that's what our department armorers always told me. Can someone enlighten me?? Based on this thinking, I've always loaded up with 230 grain rounds for the 45ACP and 180 grainers for the 40SW. I'm partial to Federal Hydrashok For anyone interested - Page 14 of the XD45 manual specifically warns against the use of: (1) Frangible ammo (2) ultra light weight projectiles at elevated velocities or (3) shotshells. Anyone know why??? Anyone care?? Last edited by F. Paul Figliaq; 02-18-2007 at 10:50 PM. Reason: New thoughts |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
| the light loads wont cycle the heavy spring-slide |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,000
| I also carry Hornady TAP. I still like the Hydra-Shocks, but I only use H-S's in my personal weapons I have not qualified with at my PD. All the weapons I have qualified with carry the TAP (department-issued). I like them both and would highly recommend them. The only caliber I use any other ammo in is my .357's. For them I use Remington Golden Sabers or Texas Deerstoppers (158-grain). The Remingtons are for my snubbies and the TD's are for my revolvers with 4" or longer barrels.
__________________ If you don't like cops, call your local crackhead for help next time! |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Too Dang Hot, Arizona
Posts: 4,284
| 117 grain in a .45 ACP?????
__________________ "It confuses me how some people can vigorously go against the 2nd. Amendment and still call themselves patriotic"-me |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,690
| 117 gr=wow Mooseman is right samuel, that Aguilla is hot stuff, and accurate. It screams at about 1350 and punches a bigger hole than ball in the paper. And Bark, the other guys will take notice of your shots with that stuff. I'm paying about 14.00 for 20 which is OK. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,522
| I've got a case of Winchester Ranger Talon 165gr "LE-only" ammo on the way. It's going to be my carry ammo for my G27.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 726
| 180 hydra shoks personal 40 or155 gold dots in my duty gun . |
| | |
| | #31 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Palm Springs, Calif.
Posts: 428
| Hornady 155 gr HP/XTP in my primary CC Glock 29 10 mm. and Ranger SXT LE 230 gr in my 1911A1s 45 ACPs. Doc |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
| try extreme shock those are some bad mofo's |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,522
| It sure looks bad, but looks can be deceiving, you be the judge: The Box O' Truth #23 - ExtremeShock™ Ammo and the Box O' Truth - Page 1
__________________ |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Senior Member | I carry International Cartridge Company Sinterfire frangible hollow points in both my .45 & 9MM. I also use them in my AR15 and my Savage 7.62X51MM sniper rifle.
__________________ Life is too important to be taken seriously. |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 726
| Gimmick, I'll stick with whats proven. |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Palm Springs, Calif.
Posts: 428
| I use hydro shocks for SD and Fiocchi for practice plus some Winchester I have had for several years. |
| | |
| | #38 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 701
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Just back far enough
Posts: 77
| Gold Dot |
| | |
| | #40 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,360
| Quote:
Lighter objects are more easily manipulated by outside forces, easier to slow and stop. But, like a .22 caliber round...it is very easy to stop, but it does a great amount of damage because it can not support its own mass while it slows down, so it blows apart. This would be comparible to say...a human, 180lbs, jumping off of a 12th floor window. SPLAT, blows apart on impact. But, drop an Iron anvil, 180lbs, from the same height and it will be perfectly fine. Actual tissue damage is negligible. A .22 caliber round will enter the flesh and explode about 1"-2" into the body. The fragments will continue until they hit bone or are stopped by their own deceleration. So, though it may not penetrate a lot, if you hit someone in the liver or lung, it can do a great deal of damage. A heavier round may over-penetrate, but you can be sure that it will not stop before it hits something vital. If it hits the breast bone, it most likely will go through it and continue on, possibly lodging in the spine or exiting through the back. Cops shoot usually only when they are being charged by someone or when someone threatens them with a weapon. There are gunfights, when rifles come in handy. But to stop an aggressor, typically maximum penetration (which includes over-penetration) is desired so that they know if they shoot at the heart or something, it isn't going to be stopped before it gets there. They want to stop the aggressor in their tracks. Then, when you look at the military, for example, the 5.56mm round... Typically military firefights are conducted between 100 and 400 yards. The rifle is more accurate at this distance, of course. But, when you hit someone, it may not stop them in their tracks. It will probably incapacitate them and cause them to stop shooting at you, which is more the point than to drop them where they stand. Rifle rounds tend to penetrate a bit more, not because they weigh less, but because of the increased velocity from the additional power as well as the fact that the 5.56mm round will have the same shotgun effect on impact as a .22, but more penetration.
__________________ "Minimum wage, minimum effort." "Never underestimate the power of stupidity." ~Me Last edited by CrazyIvan; 08-02-2007 at 11:14 PM. | |
| | |