| | #41 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Montgomery, IL.
Posts: 4,337
|
There ain't many snakes in the Chicago suburbs, so a Judge did not interest me. But there are no Bears hear either (Except Da Bears!) and that didn't stop me from getting a Raging Bull .454 Casull.
|
| | |
| | #42 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,900
|
I'm not a big fan of pistols that shoot shot, especially if they are rifled. I've shot shot loads through my .45Colt Blackhawk, and the rifling cause the shot to spread rather rapidly (centrifugal force created by the spinning shot pushing in the outward (against the barrel) direction). Anyone tried shooting these: AMM-860 - Ammo .410 S&B '000' Buck 25-Box 3 Pellets, 2.5" 410 Gauge - Manufactured by: Sellier & Bellot or 65826 - .410 Super-X Buckshot, 2-1/2" Shell, #000 Buck, 3 Pellets, 1300 fps, 5 Rounds Per Box - Manufactured by: Winchester I would think that 5 rapid shots of those, 15 .36cal balls flying down range, would be rather destructive in an invasion situation. |
| | |
| | #43 | ||
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,299
| Quote:
You must keep in mind the rifling of the Judge is not the same as your blackhawk. If anyone has not seen this video, it is worth watching. May be slow loading, but worth the wait. There are two legged snakes to watch for also. Taurus International Manufacturing Inc ***************************************************** All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing Quote:
***************************************************** All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing Last edited by mosineer; 10-16-2007 at 11:15 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost | ||
| | |
| | #44 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Montgomery, IL.
Posts: 4,337
|
I like how the Taurus commercial there makes it seem that the shot spreading out quicker is a good thing. I'm undecided which would be better. Yeah a carjacker in my window seems like a good time for spreading out. But how about for that snake 5-10 feet away?
|
| | |
| | #45 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
For that snake 10-15ft away, it's sure to hit it with enough density to take out its senses. At that distance, I was looking at about a 1ft pattern. I'd say that's ideal range for a dangerous critter. I wouldn't consider the 410 shotshell ideal at all for personal defense against 2 leggen predators, but at very short range, like less than 5ft, I'm sure it would do fine.
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf |
| | |
| | #46 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Montgomery, IL.
Posts: 4,337
|
Too bad Illinois makes it illegal to carry a loaded weapon in the car...PERIOD!
|
| | |
| | #47 |
| spiritual counselor ![]() ![]() |
__________________ |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
| The judge
I own two both are in 4 inch barrell. Limited edition model in 2 1/2 inch chamber. I thought the 3 inch was too short and the 6 a little long. Plus I figured maybe it might be more valuable being not many made. Also, I read post on someone talking about shooting Buffalo Bore ammo in this gun. I don't think this is a good idea. You may want to check with Taurus before shooting that stuff. Some of their 45LC ammo is comparable to and more powerful than standard 44 magnum ammo. In the manual that comes with the Judge, it says you should not shoot +p ammo in this gun. And buffalo bore is much more powerful than standard +p ammo. I bough some ammo from Georgia Arms and shot it and I am not sure I will shoot it again without calling Taurus first. The ammo I shot was 250 gr or 260 gr with a 1200fps. and it says only shoot in ruger, T/C and a couple other guns that shoot 45LC. The original 45Lc cowboy load was a pretty mild load. Anyway I am new to this site and was reading some posts on the Judge and thought I would put my 2 cents in. Very interested info. I read here on the Judge and hope to read some more on other guns as I am an avid gun lover. I have 14 pistols 12 rifles and a couple shotguns.
|
| | |
| | #51 |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 64
|
There's a good gun review and test on this on the Taurus home site, good reading. He brings up a good point on how the shot cups make the shot pull after a distance dur to the rifling which is understandable. But then gives an idea of getting some old .410 paper wads which should stop or lower that problem. Gives an idea for some reloads, huh.
|
| | |
| | #52 |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Posts: 1
|
I just bought a Taurus Judge. Had it for about 20 minutes before i had to send it back to the factory. i took it home - started to load it and it came apart on me. seems that the ejector plunger assembly (i thinks thats what its called) was put together wrong at the factory and was stripped when put together. i think taurus has a Quality Assurance problem. i even called taurus but i got the impression that they really didn't care. i've heard good reviews about the Judge and thought i could use it here in Minnesota for bird hunting, but i guess not this year. seems it might be 6-8 weeks before i get it back. i'll keep tab on all the postings for more shooting results with the Judge and hopefully get mine back soon to try it out. |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
|
Which is better, 3" or 6" barrel?
|
| | |
| | #54 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,299
|
First Jerinmn and ouhouseking, welcome to G&G!! There are a good group of folks here which helps make G&G such a great place to find and share information. So feel free to ask questions or contribute info. Jerinmn, sorry to hear about your Judge. I like Taurus and think they produce quality firearms, but that is something that should have never left the factory. You can read some night mare stories about Taurus customer service along with the good ones. Hope yours turns out to be a good one. Let us know. Depends on primary use. Strictly self defense as a carry, in vehicle, or home, I would say the 3". For use in hunting (legal for deer here), or back up in the woods, the 6" would be better.(for me) Both work well as self defense. So basically it is what ever you like. ***************************************************** All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Ft Worth, Texas
Posts: 9
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Lost in the Ozone Again ![]() |
Shotgun, If it's any consolation, I own 2 (both 3"; one steel one UL) and have had no problems so far. Have about 120 rds total thru the steel; 100 thru UL. Mix of .45, 000, and .410. Have shot the buffalo bore heavy standard pressure (which are not +P but heavy normal pressure loadings w/255gr keith). Both have been great pistols so far. I like Taurus firearms, but they never got back to me when I faxed them about suitability of cor-bon's thru it. |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Ft Worth, Texas
Posts: 9
| Oooops, I did it again......
Thanks for the reassurance because I went out this morning and bought another Taurus. This time a used one (I'm not sure about the model number and the gun store guy wasn't either). It's a snub nose .38 Special with a bobbed hammer in stainless steel with a fancy wood grip. It predates the built in key safety, but I don't know when Taurus adapted that. I took some pictures but don't know how to insert them here. Anyway, the fit and finish is excellent. Thanks again for the reassurance of the products. |
| | |
| | #59 |
| Lost in the Ozone Again ![]() |
Personally, I think these are great options for home defense and car/field guns as long as the limitations are well understood and the guns loaded properly for anticipated threats (i.e. Bird, bird, .45, .45, .45; Buck Buck .45, .45, .45; Bird, Buck, .45 .45; Buck, .45, Buck, .45...... etc......). For me, I don't see it as a CCW gun just due to its rapid shot dispersion and the very real possibility that shot could go where I don't want it to go. But there might be others where this situation wouldn't pose as much of a problem.
|
| | |
| | #60 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Ft Worth, Texas
Posts: 9
| Self Defense
Hopefully, none of us will ever have occasion to gain any practical experience in defending ourselves or our families, but I'm figuring on the equivilent of "buck fever" if I do. So the .410 component appeals to me. We just had an incident in DFW where an undercover cop who had been working a prostitution "sting" operation was done and headed to his car to go home when he was jumped in the motel parking lot by a robber with a gun. As instructed, he gave him his wallet, but when the robber wanted him to lie down in the front seat of his car, he balked and pulled his gun. A gunfight broke out and the robber wound up running for his car with the cop in foot pursuit and both shooting at each other. The cop finally brought him down, but it was later determined the cop went through all the bullets in his gun plus two more full clips. There were bullet marks everywhere between the two of them. Moral to that is even trained cops, and "robbers in the trade" don't get into gunfights often enough to gain any "cold eyed" experience at it and even they get buck fever and blow some shots. Starting out with a .410 shell makes lots of sense to me. Part of a .410 hitting the perp is better than a .45 in the air. It's got to get his attention.
|
| | |