01-20-2008, 03:59 PM
| #4 | |
| Super Moderator   | Quote:
The 1892 44-40 rifle looks in very good shape and is worth 2000 to 3000 dollars...if Original condition. the 1895 30-03 would run 1500 to 2500 in value by what I can tell from its condition... These are estimates from photos so it would be better to have them hands on appraised or graded for condition... Rich
__________________ You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM!  | |
|  |
|
01-24-2008, 10:24 PM
| #5 | |
| Registered User | Quote:
I’m curious about the condition of your 92. It may just be the light/reflection but wondering if that is pitting on the side of the receiver? And FYI of all the 92’s made the rifle (24” barrel) in .44-40 with octagon barrel, full length magazine & straight butt, was by far the most common accounting for about 80% of the total production. By comparison the least common was the .218 Bee at less than 1% and the .25-20 at about 4%. Many factors will affect monetary and collectible value. There were many other rare variations from the “standard run” which would increase value such as the musket or carbine model, shorter magazines, round or half-round-and-half-octagon barrels, as well as custom orders for engraving, deluxe wood, pistol grip stocks, tang sites, set triggers as so on. Having said that, condition is always a huge factor and if your 92 is in the condition that it appears to be and is unaltered then it is a highly desirable collectable and you should not pass on the opportunity to acquire it providing the price doesn’t include your first born. I am not as optimistic as Mooseman on the $ 2 to 3 K value, however, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and price is always dictated in the end by how badly a potential buyer wants the item. I hope you’re able to acquire both these excellent finds. Last edited by Goodguy; 01-25-2008 at 08:47 AM. Reason: correct typo | |
|
| |
Linear Mode
