[mym1a]

Originally Posted by GlockMeister

Me thinks it's just Obama trying to get something positiveback, back for all the flack he's gotten for what he's said in the past in regards to the war in general. It's probably about as true as what the New York Times is saying about McCain, just about a month after endorsing him. What a joke. Why endorse someone than a month later try to smear him in the press? In both stories, let's see some proof. Not just here say.
And in this Obama story, did he give a soldiers name? Oh wait, let me guess it too was anonymous. lol

Did anyone here the comment his wife said, I guess twice, because it was in the speech she was reading and she must have used the same speech twice? Don't know if she wrote it or what, but she had to have read it before hand to approve it. I hope your right glock??

Anyhow, I guess in this speech she gave, she said that for the 1st time in 45 years, she was actually had something she could be proud of as an American or something to that effect. I'm not sure what it was that was the only thing to make her proud to be an American in 45 years. They never said what that was.
But seriously, she never watched T.V. or listened to a radio for 45 years? In her mind or eyes, the U.S. and Americans are so bad there was nothing else that makes her proud of the country her husband wants to be President of and the same one she'll represent as the First Lady if he wins the office? What a crock of S_ _ T

They (Fox news,CNN, etc.etc.etc.) every channel I saw it on, said that since it was said during the nomination process that it more then likely won't hurt her hubby, but had it been said during the general election, it more then likely would have hurt his chances if not ruined them.