AK-47 - Mosin Nagant - Powder Keg

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Military Firearms > AR15/M16

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-29-2008, 09:26 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
JOEGUN94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MARSHALL
Posts: 157
Trader Rating: (0)
6.8 spc verse 6.5 grendel availability.

what are your thoughts on the two calibers above.
am building 2 more ar types.
want something different. how is the ammo availability? looked at silver state ammo. high prices, . any comment will be appreciated.
JOEGUN94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 12:36 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,775
Trader Rating: (0)
The 6.8spc is supposed to have a higher capacity than the 6.5gren.

The 6.5 has better long range ballistics.

The 6.8 has lower recoil.

I think both will be equally hard to find. Hand loading might be the way to go.
Bravo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 12:41 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
GlockMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 4,943
Trader Rating: (0)
Not to mention both will be pricey for some time to come. Probably always will be?
Not sure if you need it or if you'll even find it or not. I think you tube has a video on both rounds you can watch and also futureweapons did a story on the 6.5 Grendel I believe. Watching some of the video, especially on futureweapons might sway you one way or they other?

The thing about futureweapons when I saw them compare the .223,7.62 and the 6.5 Grendel was when Mack shot at the steel. To show knockdown power of the 6.5 Grendel and the 7.62. The thing was, the .223 would have knocked the steel down also. It would of had he shot the steel targets high like he did with the other 2 calibers.

He's done similar when he's tested stuff. He'll shoot the one he's boasting real good, aim right and the other he's comparing it to, he shoots low. Did it with one other caliber comparison. Can't remember those 2 though.

What is your reason/s for considering either in the first place, if I might ask that is? Just for something different in an AR style design or what?
__________________
I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6!

Last edited by GlockMeister; 03-30-2008 at 12:47 AM.
GlockMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 08:34 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
madcratebuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 498
Trader Rating: (0)
I see 6.8 uppers in SGN for under $500. I haven't looked lately, but I think there is more reloading options for the 6.8, plus more commercial ammo available.
__________________
The difference between a hot dog and a weenie is a fine line.....
madcratebuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 08:59 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Beer Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,696
Trader Rating: (0)
6.8 is more abundant, but 6.5 is a much more powerful round. Both are very very pricey.
__________________
Paramedic
sks forever
Beer Forever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 01:30 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,255
Trader Rating: (0)
Risk factor

The history of firearms is paved with good cartridges that just did not make it in the marketplace.

There is nothing wrong with these cartridges but note they are not
really "in" the marketplace in the sense of an established cartridge
such as the .308, .30-06, .243, etc.

They could go on to be very popular or they could fade away quickly if demand does not take off. If you choose either of them at present
you have the risk factor.
nathangdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.

[Output: 57.87 Kb. compressed to 54.48 Kb. by saving 3.39 Kb. (5.86%)]