04-01-2008, 06:43 PM
| #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2
| 600 NE in a Contender, is it to much? |
|  |
|
04-01-2008, 08:36 PM
| #2 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,194
|
Lol seen that one before but how that guy shoots i would say yessssssss
|
|
| |
|
04-01-2008, 08:48 PM
| #3 |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 85
|
Looks like a guy trying out for a Darwin Award! You can see that the scope flew off. It's hard to see what became of the gun. Did the barrel come off, too? SL11 |
|
| |
|
04-01-2008, 10:41 PM
| #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,496
| One way to look at it/another way to look at it
If you are a super robot as in the original Terminator movie it would be practical, useful, and probably accurate. On the other hand, if you have bones of calcium and cellular muscles/tendons it would not be practical, not be useful, and reconstructive surgery would be necessary before accuracy was attained. |
|
| |
|
04-01-2008, 10:49 PM
| #5 |
| Senior Member   Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 5,504
|
Well first of all you don't lean back when you shoot. What a flippin' moron. I also bet that scope is now trashed, hope it wasn't expensive?
__________________ I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6! |
|
| |
|
04-02-2008, 02:25 PM
| #7 | |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 85
| Quote:
SL11 | |
|
| |
|
04-14-2008, 12:48 PM
| #8 |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 6
|
Just goes to prove that one does not have to be smart to own a firearm, one just needs money. HR |
|
| |
