| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,181
| enfield no. 4 Mk 1 Plus PICS ![]() if you can't see any numbers let me know ill check...also where it is stamped England the symbol looks like a crown with a P in a sort of circle underneath. Sorry for the pic quality on some. Any info. on year of birth, where, etc. would be greatly appreciated. Also i have no clue of value. Thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 299
| Royal Ordanance Factory Fazackerly The "A" and the end of the serial number shows that this rifle has parts that are not interchangable with other No4's
__________________ http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...LongStamp1.jpg |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,181
| well why did they do that!?? lol Anyone know anything else about this gun?? sorry to bump Last edited by sell33; 04-11-2008 at 05:55 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,181
| Nobody knows anything else about this?? sorry i'm really just wondering value and when it was made... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: currently "Sunny West Africa"
Posts: 1,650
| For some reason, I can only get one photo to open, maybe they're too big for our tiny bandwidth where I am. Can you post all the numbers/proof marks you can read and where they are stamped on the rifle.. Also check the barrel numbers & post them. Also how many grroves does the rifling have? The year of manufacture is normally stamped (or ep'd) on the left hand side of the receiver beside the model number. If it has a FTR stamp on the (usually)left side, that would mean factory thorough repair, ie. a factory recondition. Rear sights, if they are of the pressed steel type, or simple two position flip that would indicate wartime manufacture. Solid machined sights indicate, pre/early war or post war production. Proof marks: Proof marks denoting Maltby manufacture include: M, ROF(M), RM Fazakerly manufacture: ROF(F), F, FY BSA manufacture: B, 85B, M47 More info we have , the easier it is to find it's history. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member | I asked about the A suffix and here was the response from lithyaddict After the British withdrawal from Dunkirk the poms were desperate for anything that would fire a bullet. At the time there were a heap of No.4 trials rifles in storage, so these were naturally placed in service. As they were trials rifles, several bits and pieces were different to the standard No.4 in service, so the A prefix was changed to a suffix to denote that there was a chance that some parts were not interchangeable. Any remaining A suffix rifles were ordered to be withdrawn and scrapped in the mid 1950s.
__________________ Jan. 4, 2007...Gasoline $2.10/gallon HMMM? Jim |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Banned | Lithy knows his stuff.Hes not called lithyaddict for nothing.He also has a mean collection of lithgows and enfields.Ill ask him if i can post a pic of some of his collection.Which includes a couple JCs and a sniper or two.Along with many other interesting rifles. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member | Lithy sent this later. I had to consult the bible to answer this one but it appears that differences included alterations to the cocking piece, striker, striker keeper screw, buttplate,rearsight plunger, backsight and composition of steel for the breechbolt. Many of these rifles were produced as factory exercises in manufacture (resulting in discrepancies between units) and not intended for use. As a footnote, 2749 trials rifles were produced which would make this one a more desirable specimen to a collector.
__________________ Jan. 4, 2007...Gasoline $2.10/gallon HMMM? Jim |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South Arkansas
Posts: 10,684
| Wow this is interesting to say the least ! |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,181
| so being a "trial rifle" any idea what the value would be?? |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,181
| Hmm. who knows. I looked on gunbroker and there were only a few and different values so I'm not really sure but I am sure that it is worth more than my dad payed for it... |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Military Rifle Collector ![]() | Sell if only 2749 of these were built you can be sure they would be collectable. I was wondering why it didnt have all the usual marks you find on other Enfields.
__________________ Let's light this fuse and see what happens! |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,181
| i hope so!!! lol dad got lucky i suppose....he only paid 85 dollars for it! |
| | |