| | #21 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Iowa
Posts: 269
| Quote:
__________________ Join the cartridge comparisons group! http://gunandgame.com/forums/group.php?groupid=3 | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Little town in ARKANSAW!
Posts: 2,310
|
45/70 with a backup .44 mag would be my choice.
__________________ If you don't have anything good to say... Don't say it! |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Southern B.C.
Posts: 86
|
I'd be takeing my .416 Rem. Mod. 70 with 350 TSXs at close to 2700 fps. or 400 interbonds at 2450 fps.
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Iowa
Posts: 269
|
I know "theres no such thing as overkill on Brown Bears", but come on. 416 and 458's? 30-06 will work and the most you need is a 375.
__________________ Join the cartridge comparisons group! http://gunandgame.com/forums/group.php?groupid=3 |
| | |
| | #25 |
| The Mayor ![]() |
Sometimes, everything goes wrong when bear hunting. Are you prepared for the unexpected???
__________________ The Most Expensive Commodity In This Country Is Ignorance! |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: June-Dec. Arusha, TZ~Dec.-June PSL, FL.
Posts: 188
| Quote:
Best,
__________________ Phil Lozano Phil Lozano Tanzania Trophy Expeditions | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Troll B' Gone ![]() ![]() | Agreed, a .416 Rigby or Rem Mag would be excellent for breaking down a big bear.
__________________ "Recoil lasts for a second, gravity lasts forever" |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Southern B.C.
Posts: 86
| Phil, if you're talking about the TSX I have had excellent results with this bullet. I've used the plain old Barnes X 300 gr. .416 to break both shoulders on a fairly good bull Elk. Could it be that the African game you're shooting is harder on bullets than N/A game? Not diputing your experiences just curious as I've had nothing but good results.
|
| | |
| | #29 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Alaska
Posts: 83
|
If I'm hunting big brown bears in the spring which I plan on doing very, very soon, I will be using my Marlin 1895XLR 45-70, setup with WWG's ghost ring and Williams Firesight, Bearproof ejector and shooting 420 gr Garrett Hammerheads. I also have a Winchester Model 70 Classic 375 H&H that I use on moose and fall grizzlies, I shoot 300 gr Federal Premium Nosler Partitions. I like my odds....
|
| | |
| | #30 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Alabama
Posts: 142
|
Interesting considering the source. Hunt Alaska: Choosing a Firearm, Cartridge and Bullet, Alaska Department of Fish and Game |
| | |
| | #31 |
| Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Cumberland, MD USA
Posts: 199
|
I had to make this choice, and I went with a Remington model 700 XCR .338 Rem. Ultra Mag. with a 4x12 Meopta on top shot a 1,750 lb costal brown with it at 250 yards with a 225 gr nosler on the main land but around the area of Kodiac island ran approx 80 yards and fell over dead, the guide had a 416 rigby he never had to use it
|
| | |
| | #32 | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: June-Dec. Arusha, TZ~Dec.-June PSL, FL.
Posts: 188
| Quote:
The problem I have found with the Barnes TSX's is 1/2 of them work perfectly and 1/2 fail miserably. Nothing inbetween. There is another guy on another forum that has experienced the same himself (actually more than one hunter). A client of mine contacted Barnes about their TSX's after seeing my photos of how badly the bullets perform. Barnes emailed me and we had a 4 or 5 email exchange. Basically, they said the reason the bullets acted so violently was high impact velocity. I mentioned to them one of the animals was shot at 140 yards. They just kept saying it was high impact velocity, . . . . . . . . . . . so I guess you cannot use their bullets under 150 yards. I asked themif they had changed anything in the bullet. They said "NO". Anyone that wants to see the photos can register at my forum and have a look. As it turns out, Barnes has changed the metal in their bullets 31 times. They ended up saying, basically, . . . . . . . . . . . it is your photos against our word and more people know and trust our bullet than will believe your photos. OK, no problem. However, I asked them to explain the fact that I have had other clients shoot the same animal at about the same range with 300 Wby's and the bullet did not perform in a bad way due to high impact velocities. I never got an answer to that question. Whoever wants to use Barnes bullets, Hey, no problem by me. I just hope you shoot the 1/2 that works. If the bullet fails, the animal is still yours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . dead or wounded, . . . . . . found or lost. I only use partition type bullets, or extremely well engineered bullets, e.g. Swift A-Frame (the best ), North Forks (no longer made, pity), Woodliegh's (softs and solids), Trophy Bonded (a very good bullet) and Nosler partitions (pretty good, but my last choice). I have never seen a Swift, NF, Woodleigh, or TB fail . . . . . ever ! No matter what the impact velocity was. All are well engineered bullets. I do use other bullets on game that I really do not care if I shoot at one or not . . . like Deer. If I have a good broadside shot, OK, if it is quartering, OK, I'll let it walk. However, if I am going hunting for an animal I really want . . . . . . . I will load with the best bullets. I do enough tracking of wounded critters in Tanzania, I don't want to have to track my own critters so I use bullets that are proven to put critters on the ground. The bullets I mention are not the most accurate of bullets, but they are the best. Best,
__________________ Phil Lozano Phil Lozano Tanzania Trophy Expeditions | |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: oregon
Posts: 411
|
[ The bullets I mention are not the most accurate of bullets, but they are the best. Best,[/quote] phil when you say not the most accurate, how much accuracy do you think you give up. Evidently it's not much. |
| | |
| | #35 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Iowa
Posts: 269
| Quote:
__________________ Join the cartridge comparisons group! http://gunandgame.com/forums/group.php?groupid=3 | |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Melvina, Wi.
Posts: 24
|
I shot my first grizz(interior ) and coastal brown-with a 30-06 with factory 220gr corelokts- later went to 338 then rem 416 when backing clients. For Kodiaks I'd not consider anything smaller than 375 H&H and most likely would take the 416.
|
| | |
| | #37 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Southern B.C.
Posts: 86
|
Phil, thats interesting. I've only shot a few animals with the old Barnes X. Always worked good. I've shot a grand total of three animals with the TSX. I experienced extreme destruction on all three but put it down to the high vel. rounds I was useing. One was the 338/378 with 210 TSX at 3450 fps, the other was my STW with 160 TSX at 3300. The 7 mm kill was around 400 yds. and the bullet exited through the off shoulder. When I skinned it the rest of the shoulder fell off. The 338 blasted huge holes and exited both times. Being a P/H you see a lot more of these bullets used than us normal hunters. Thanks for the heads up I may have to rethink my bullet choices. I was going to use the 270 TSX in my 378 but that may be a bad idea too. Damn these things shoot good in ever caliber I've tried. ' |
| | |
| | #38 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: June-Dec. Arusha, TZ~Dec.-June PSL, FL.
Posts: 188
| Quote:
Barnes are accurate bullets. Great for inflating your ego at the range. Not so hot when the chips are down and you need to have great results from your bullets. IMO The photos on my forum are from one safari. I do not take many photos to post on forums, but the results oof the TSX's were just terrible . . . . . . . for a guy shooting a once in a life time trophy to mount. Pity. Best,
__________________ Phil Lozano Phil Lozano Tanzania Trophy Expeditions | |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 704
|
For self defence, a 12 guage Remingtion 870, with no plug in the mag, and a full load of slugs. For hunting the bear on my own terms, I see no reason to use anything different than what I would hunt moose with; 264WM with 140 grain Nosler Partition at 3200 fps. Now bring on the wrath of Africa On the video, were those not cubs? Ron |
| | |
| | #40 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: June-Dec. Arusha, TZ~Dec.-June PSL, FL.
Posts: 188
| Quote:
I would say a Benelli is more reliable in the long term. I use a M-Super 90 to follow wounded Leopards. I wouldn't "bang" on people if they had related their experience in hunting dangerous games, such as Cape Buffalo. Contrary to the belief of many, the 6.5, 270, 30 and 33 calibers are not the end all to all hunting solutions. Neither is speed with light for caliber bullets adequate for all situations. Nor was Jack O'Connor always correct. "The proof is in the pudding" as they say, and between myself and all the other people I know that hunt game, we have shot or seen shot animals into the thousands, which should make us more qualified to judge what works and what is inadequate . . . . . . . . . . . . . even compared to Jack. I have been very fortunate in knowing many people we read about. People respected in the hunting/shooting community, through their writing and shooting. And when the all suggest the same cartridge/caliber for a certain hunt/animal, people should listen. Make no mistake, I have a love affair with my 7mm Mag., but I also realize it is not a laser/lightning bolt/dead ray, under all conditions. Facts and personal experiences instead of conjecture would be more helpful and informative to all. Best,
__________________ Phil Lozano Phil Lozano Tanzania Trophy Expeditions Last edited by Phil Lozano; 04-18-2008 at 08:12 AM. | |
| | |