| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 609
| Barrel Porting Im just throwing this out there, Im planning on getting a Ruger SP101 .357mag with a 3 1/16 inch barrel sometime in the near future. I was planning on making it a really nice gun with a professional trigger job and maybe some different grips etc. I was looking at some places that do custom work specifically on SP101s one of the things some were doing was barrel porting. Anything from larger holes on the top of the barrel to the magna porting on the sides to cut down on muzzle flash interfering with your front sites. I was just wondering what everyone else thought on the whole process. Whether it was worth it, the pros, cons, etc. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Iowa
Posts: 133
| Mag=Na=Porting works real well. Both of my 454 Casull's are ported and made a great difference in recoil, same as my heavy caliber rifles and shotguns. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,853
| Well, my Taurus 608 came with barrel porting. It's .357 Magnum and it really does make a difference. Shooting .38s through it feels like plinking with .22s and the .357 Magnum rounds feel very light and reacquiring is a lot easier. Take the holes on the top to reduce muzzle rise, you won't regret it. - Coeloptera |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 609
| Quote:
hmm thats good. as opposed to the mag-na porting which is off canted to the side, my only concern with top ports would be the blast distorting my sight picture, but then again something like this http://www.geminicustoms.com/DSC02023.JPG does look really nice. | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,853
| Quote:
I wonder if having the ports down the entire barrel length makes a difference in a shorter barrel like that. I haven't noticed any problems with seeing as the gases vent, though. I don't notice any additional flash traveling upwards. Just be sure to clean them thoroughly though. Ports get filthy. I have to agree though, it's very nice. Just unusual enough to be fairly striking. - Coeloptera | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member | Thats some serious porting. I bet that would make a nice light show at night. If you had a really fast camera, you could get the fire ball coming up from every hole. It would make one heck of an ATT commerical, "raising the bar". I wonder if they could port in bettween the side and the top so at an angle. That way it would give downward resistance but also keep the flash out of the sights? Just a thought. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,853
| Quote:
It may also have something to do with the fact that many barrels do not have perfectly round exteriors. Many are flat on top or at the sides. Making cutouts at the apex of angles may weaken it slightly, I would think. If you wanted to bend a square pipe, you wouldn't drill holes in the top or side, you'd saw slits in the corners. - Coeloptera | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: WAITSFIELD VERMONT
Posts: 1,595
| Mine has the holes of diffrent sizes on the top DANA |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Iowa
Posts: 133
| Mag-Na-Port is angled to the back. It is suppossed to direct the muzzle forward and down. Rifle porting is about 45 degrees and 90 degrees off top center of barrel and most handguns are at 45 degrees and heavy kickers and snubbies can get the rifle porting on them. Shotgun porting is two rows of holes each side of top center. Again angled back. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Maine
Posts: 122
| now i want to get my .454 casull done. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 86
| TACAV: Here's a really good article covering the pros and cons of porting. And specifically, they test and compare a non-ported SP101 to a Gemini Customs ported SP101. Check it out: http://www.rohrbaughforum.com/port.pdf ClayMan |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 609
| Quote:
nice article thanks! | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,853
| Very interesting article and it confirms what most of us have experienced: ported barrels reduce muzzle rise and allow a slightly faster reacquisition of the target. I don't know about one thing, though. I never noticed any increased concussion directed my way. Then again, I'm very used to larger calibers for pistols (frankly, for me, if I'm firing a wheelgun, let's start at .357 Magnum), so it might just be me not registering it. In fact, the only round that ever surprised me was the first time I fired the .40 S&W round. It was a bit punchier than I had expected it to be. I also have to agree with the author about the night vision. The muzzle flash is going to be hovering in my sight line no matter what, with about the same amount of light going out into that space. A pistol is so slender an object that I can't imagine it can shade that very much. I have a question about muzzle velocity, though. Does position of the porting matter? If the porting is at the very end of the barrel only, is the bullet's muzzle velocity going to be impacted more than if the porting extends the length of the barrel? The front sight does get dirty though, as I mentioned before. But I never notice it until after I'm finished shooting and that's usually at least 50-70 rounds. - Coeloptera |
| | |