| | #21 | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| The Mayor ![]() | Quote:
![]()
__________________ The Most Expensive Commodity In This Country Is Ignorance! | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Alaska
Posts: 899
| I don't own any of those calibers. If I had to make a choice faced with only those 3 options it would be the 7mm-08 . More rifles to choose from, availability of ammo and components. Once again, larger bullet diameter when all else for the most part, is equal. |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| The Mayor ![]() | Quote:
__________________ The Most Expensive Commodity In This Country Is Ignorance! | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Otago New Zealand
Posts: 656
| Then how come my gunsmith has chronied his 260 pushing a 130grain pill at 3200fps turner? I'm sure it could get a 140 doing better than 3000, and with a berger bullet and a BC of well over 6 the world is your oyster...
__________________ Happy Hunting |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| I wouldn't argue your gunsmith's velocity with a 130gr, but do feel there's no way you're gonna see 3000FPS with a 140grainer when both a 6.5/.284 and 6.5Rem mag would have a tough time achieving it. The 6.5x55 is a fine round (I own 2), but if you want high performance rather than the moderate recoil everyone raves about, the two big S/A 6.5s or the big daddy .264Win mag are the way to go. Simply my opinion. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Iowa
Posts: 269
| 6,5x55 use good heavy bullets and there isn't a thing short of moose it won't handle.
__________________ Join the cartridge comparisons group! http://gunandgame.com/forums/group.php?groupid=3 Last edited by vikingpreacher; 04-28-2008 at 03:27 PM. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Senior Member | According to Nosler a 6.5X55 gets about 3000fps with 120s, and 2800fps with 140s. The 7mm-08 gets 3200fps with 120s and 2900-3000fps with 140s. But with the 7mm-08 youc can also load 160's which will also go about 2800fps. I know you can get 160 6.5 bullets but Nolser does not show them. So its a toss up whether you want the better selection of bullets and a slightly greater velocity, or the reduced velocity but greater penetration power of the 6.5 bullets. |
| | |
| | #31 | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| Quote:
6.5x55 139gr Vulcan @ 2854 FPS.... 2515 FPE and with a 200yd zero: 1.8" high @ 100yds. 7/08 140gr TBBC @2950 FPS.... 2705 FPE and with a 200yd zero: 1.7" high @ 100yds. 7/08 139gr SPBT @ 3000 FPS.... 2777 FPE and with a 200yd zero: 1.5" high @ 100yds. Go ahead and check as these are the BEST loadings in either caliber! The 140 gr TBBC loading will outperform ANY 6.5x55 loading loaded by any major loader. If this shooter was a handloader wanting to push the envelope, I doubt they would have asked this question! Again, I do say that if you like that 6.5x55, buy it, as no game animal will likely notice the difference at ranges up to 350yds. BUT, there is a difference, period! | |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Iowa
Posts: 269
| Your right is clearly is better than the 6.5x57, but not the 6.5x55.
__________________ Join the cartridge comparisons group! http://gunandgame.com/forums/group.php?groupid=3 |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Otago New Zealand
Posts: 656
| Turner, I've owned both and put both over the chrony, both with 120's 3000fps even. I for one would NOT like to have a 140 out of the 708 doing 3000, a mate I load for runs a hot 708 and it's not comfortable to shoot and I have no problem with 7mm mag etc.
__________________ Happy Hunting |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| I've no doubt you're correct with reloads and info in reloading manuals. The load I mentioned was a LM one from Hornady and I understand it is next to impossible to duplicate these loads, without their proprietary powders. I did read an interesting article just the other night in a magazine that said a new powder was about to be released that would and COULD facilitate handloaders in matching LM and SM rounds loaded by maunfacturers. I'm interested in reading a bit more about it. BTW, the load I use in my 7/08 is the Hornady LM one and it pretty much duplicates a good comercial .280 load. Nope, I've never chronied it. |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,340
| Both are great!!! Flip a coin!
__________________ Just because your paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you! |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Northeast Kansas
Posts: 127
| I don't see any 7/08 chamberings on the CZ website, my vote is for the 110+ year old mauser round. |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Otago New Zealand
Posts: 656
| Interesting you say about bullet development turner cause I only use one and that is the BT which should put them on the same playing field, I've tired it in calibres around this size and found it the best for the job SO FAR. Now after using the 708 for several years of late it surprised me to go back to the 6.5 and see what it could do when it came to killing. Does it beat the 7mm? In my opinion, YES resoundly, but it is an opinion and we know what their worth. LOL I look forward to my 6.5/06 when it arrives, already got the bullets ordered and am hoping they will go better than 3000+. Not a 260 or a 6.5X55, but the bullet is the same
__________________ Happy Hunting |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| Wirehunt, Congrats on your new 6.5/06! I ended up going in the opposite direction and got a S/A screamer, the 6.5Rem mag. I had been contemplating building (having it built) a 6.5/.284 and saw the ballistics (actually of all three) are pretty much identical and I got a KILLER deal on a NIB 673 in 6.5RM. I've shot it a bit and really like it, and am hoping to try it out on our deer herd here in Tn and Ky next season. |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: mn
Posts: 4,806
| frankly, if you use the 6.5x55 in a modern rifle, it can be loaded hotter. all comercial loads you'll find are safe for any gun (old mausers). |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| I'll not agree that ALL loadings are made for the oldest rifle in the bunch, merely the American ones! Apparently the European courts feel that warnings about gun condition mean more that what our company's think our courts will. Not Norma nor Wolf or Sellier & Bellot load anything (hot as it might be) in a 6.5x55 to compete with the top 7/08 loads, period. A shooter today, building or buying a rifle knows there are other selections, other than a 6.5x55 in a L/A (or short action, for that matter) that outperform a Swede, to try them. As good as it is (I own two) it is not, oops, NOT, the best selection in today's market. My short action 6.5RM will shoot like weight bullets about 300-400FPS faster than my 6.5x55. And you all can take that to the bank. |
| | |