| | #1 |
| Registered User | The Sportsman Cleveland 12 Gauge I have a double barrel 12 gauge that has "The Sportsman" on the left side of the receiver, underneath that it has Cleveland. There are no other markings on the gun other than the serial number. Does anyone know anything about the maker or age of the gun? It is hammerless. Thanks. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member ![]() | I'll see if I can find anything on it. Ok, 1) SPORTSMAN Tradename used by W. Bingham Company of Cleveland, Ohio on shotguns made by Crescent Fire Arms Company. Crescent made several models of hammerless shotguns.Merged with NR DAVIS & SONS in 1929, renamed CRESCENT - DAVIS. 2)SPORTSMAN Tradename used by J. Stevens Arms Company on Model 315 and Model 90 shotguns. Both companies were bought out by Savage, Stevens around 1921, Cresent-Davis around 1930. Leaning towards Crescent, due to the lack of markings and the "Cleveland" stamping. Check out online auctions and see if either of the Stevens models looks like yours. Last edited by Kodiak32; 05-01-2008 at 10:15 PM. Reason: avoiding double post |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Registered User | Thanks again Kodiak. It looks like a Crescent sidelock. I sent it to Gunstocks Inc. maybe they can be sure about it. It will be cheaper if it is a Crescent than having a stock made for it for sure. Are you a gunsmith? I just found a complete list of guns made by Crescent and Sportsman is listed on it. Thanks for the help. Last edited by coosa; 05-02-2008 at 11:10 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member ![]() | Glad to be of help Coosa. No I'm not a gunsmith, just spent countless hours researching off the beaten trail type of firearms, I have a few myself. The oddest is a Thomas Moxham Indian Chiefs Musket, spent weeks on that one and found very little information . Still trying too find out more about it other than the basic line "used to sweeten treaty deals". ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Registered User | Hi Kodiak32 You might have found this tidbit already but in case you didn't here it is, from a museum. The gun shown in the illustration required conservation treatment, including stabilization and cleaning. It was thought by the owners simply to be a trade musket of British manufacture, andlittle else of histokal value was discernible. The conversion of the weapon from flintlock to caplock indicated that it had been valued sufficiently by its owner to continue in use long after its style was outmoded. During treatment heavy layers of corrosion were removed from the steel barrel, revealing the stamps of the English ordnance department and the crown of King George IV. Above them was a fox in a circle, the mark of the North West TradinCompany which came into being after the war of 1812. The barrel also had ‘London’ stamped on it. The lock, when also cleaned of corrosion, showed the maker’s name, Moxham. Thomas Moxham was a Birmingham gunsmith who lived from 1762 to 1837. On the left side of the stock, stamped into the wood, were the initials ‘T.C.’T.h ese were probably the mark of the maker of the stock and possibly the person who assembled the gun in Moxham’s workshop. The symbol of a boar in a circle, also stamped on the lock, appeared on all guns presented to Indian chiefs in North America. Furthermore, a blackened plaque on the stock proved to be a silver cartouche bearing the bust of an Indian chief. The foresight also proved to be of silver. All these features taken together indicated that the weapon was a presentation gun, rather than one made simply for trade. The process of conservation treatment therefore enhanced considerably the curatorial information on the object, and increased its historical value. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member ![]() | Thanks Coosa! Any information I find on that thing puts me a step ahead. I did find one that looked almost indentical in the Lundy Lane Museum in Canada. I contacted the curator of the musuem and he sounded like he was interested in helping research it, but nothing since. The description of what you posted sounds indentical too mine, it has the silver inlayed indian bust, boar in a circle and even the conversion. The only thing missing is the fox in a circle, it may be on there I'll have too double check. The musket has been in the family since at least 1920, thats when my grandmothers uncle gave it to my grandfather. It spent most of it's time in a closest and brought out by my grandfather from time to time as conversation piece. The over condition is good, the brass and silver are in good shape and the stock looks great. It even has the original ramrod. It's looks better than the last russian capture mauser I bought. I have no idea where it actually came from, I'm sure my grandfather told me but I was too young then. Just a few miles from my house, Miami Chief Richardville built a Council house at the Forks of the Wabash around 1834, his sucessor Chief Lafontaine lived at the house. Many treaties were said too be signed at that location. It may have belonged too one of them, but who knows. My grandmothers side of the family have lived in this area since the 1840's. The Council house is still standing and now a museum, I might check and see if they would like too display it for awhile. I talked too someone about it a year ago and they were very interested. Sorry we got off topic folks, but thats how it works on the information exchange. Thanks again Coosa, the more information the better.. Last edited by Kodiak32; 05-03-2008 at 09:45 PM. |
| | |