| | #1 |
| Member | M16 fullauto or 3 shot burst Ok here the thing thats getting me the most. I read as much as i can about gun and the different gun makes and models, but one thing i cant get clear is that are m16s now full auto and during the 60s-70s 3 shot burst or is it the other way around i dont kno any one in the military so i cant ask them. thanks for the help on a dumb ?. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member ![]() | yup current are 3 rnd burst (military anyway) civilian still semiauto though somehow brandon got the AR-15 at the range to do 3rnd burst kind of a fluke but hey that AR-15 has issues lol
__________________ "Speak softly but carry a big stick" -Teddy Roosevelt |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member | Since the A2, the M16 is available as full auto or burst. The United States Government went with burst, but the rifle can be ordered with full auto or burst. I believe the Canadian Government continues to use the full auto.
__________________ Life is too important to be taken seriously. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Registered User | While serving in the Marine corps as a grunt, 0311 rifle man. I trained with the m16A2. I have fired many, many rounds on the 3 round burst, it's used a mainly for supression fire to keep the enemy's heads down so you can move. You will not be as accurate on burst but you should hit your target while empting a mag. I never had a problem while using burst mode. We used the colt model. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member | On all the articles I read, they say if you pull the trigger twice, it will stop the burst mid fire. So, the next trigger pull would only fire one shot. I personally would rather have a light trigger pull M16 rifle, so I could rapid tap it, having the same effect as 3 round burst. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member | M-16 burst I served in the early 70"s and can tell you, you are gonna get more accuracy with semi-auto, if you want to keep their heads down, full auto will work but can be a waste of ammo. the barrel climb was still minimal compared to the M-14. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member | The A2 model has a "burst memory" due to the design of the mechanism. So if you fire two rounds and let go, you will only fire one round the next pull. They tought us to yank back the trigger when we were firing burst and it would fire all three rounds before your muscle reflex would release it. I always thoguht the burst fire modification was a crutch for poor training. If you let your troops shoot on the ranges enough, they will develop trigger control on a full auto weapon that mimics a burst weapon. Thats why you see alot of the elite units going to full auto M4 configuration weapons. They have the advantage of fire suppression FA and they also practice enough to have proper trigger control. SW
__________________ http://snfwtp.blogspot.com/ |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Registered User | When shooting from a moving vehicle, a last man standing situation or firing at a moving target, auto would be much better. In theory I see no need for burst as they train us mainly with semi use only. In practice though you don't have to to high of a ASVAB score to be an Infantryman and leaders having the ability to control there soldier rate of fire and ammo consumption by not making there personal weapon have the full auto "rock&roll" selection is probably a good thing. I have ran into some real smart infantryman but i've also had my share gommer piles SPC D. A co 3/116th INF BCT, 29TH ID "Stonewall Brigade" |
| | |