Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Hunting Forum > Big Game Hunting

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2008, 02:17 PM   #81
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern B.C.
Posts: 85
Phil, good to see someone other than me try to explain why big guns work better. Seems to be a lotta guys who think any bullet that puts a hole in an animal is the one to use. I'm stayin outa this.
mtm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 04:08 PM   #82
Senior Member
 
Phil Lozano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: June-Dec. Arusha, TZ~Dec.-June PSL, FL.
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtm1 View Post
Seems to be a lotta guys who think any bullet that puts a hole in an animal is the one to use. I'm stayin outa this.




Best,
__________________
Phil Lozano
Phil Lozano Tanzania Trophy Expeditions
Phil Lozano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 04:17 PM   #83
Troll B' Gone

 
Midas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Springdale, Arkansas
Posts: 3,800
Images: 2
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtm1 View Post
Phil, good to see someone other than me try to explain why big guns work better. Seems to be a lotta guys who think any bullet that puts a hole in an animal is the one to use. I'm stayin outa this.
Bigger bullets anchor bigger game better. That's been my philosophy for many years, and it has held true time and time again.
__________________
"Recoil lasts for a second, gravity lasts forever"
Midas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 04:56 PM   #84
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cental Iowa
Posts: 26
In my mind it's alot like pulling a trailer with a pickup, yes you can pull a 30 foot camper with a S-10 pickup, but why when you could do the same job with a diesel dually safer, faster, and more effective ???? There's a differance between doing something a certian way just to prove you can do it, and doing it the most effective way. just my 2 cents worth, I don't ever want to be under gunned!! I'll pack the gun that's a pound or two heavier knowing it'll get the job done
Kaboom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 06:42 PM   #85
Senior Member
 
Phil Lozano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: June-Dec. Arusha, TZ~Dec.-June PSL, FL.
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midas View Post
Bigger bullets anchor bigger game better. That's been my philosophy for many years, and it has held true time and time again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaboom View Post
In my mind it's alot like pulling a trailer with a pickup, yes you can pull a 30 foot camper with a S-10 pickup, but why when you could do the same job with a diesel dually safer, faster, and more effective ???? There's a differance between doing something a certian way just to prove you can do it, and doing it the most effective way. just my 2 cents worth, I don't ever want to be under gunned!! I'll pack the gun that's a pound or two heavier knowing it'll get the job done







Best,
__________________
Phil Lozano
Phil Lozano Tanzania Trophy Expeditions
Phil Lozano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 06:42 PM   #86
Senior Member
 
Rattle'em up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnumsrule View Post
I dont understand this as the 7mm mag had more energy that both of these rounds.

I'm with you on this one. Maybey there should be a thread on the 30-06 vs the 7mm remington mag for elk.
Rattle'em up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 07:00 PM   #87
Senior Member
 
Shuak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ctrl,alt,del
Posts: 183
IMO the more expansion you get from your round the better. Barnes triple shock solid copper bullets expand in an x pattern and to not come apart when it hits the animal so the mass of the bullet is carried through causing more damage from the bullet itself and also from hydrostatic shock. Federal loads Triple shock as does some other brands that I can't think of off the top of my head.
Shuak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 07:07 PM   #88
Senior Member
 
Rattle'em up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 103
Most people I know dont like the recoil of a magnum. A 338mag with 30lbs of recoil is alot for most people besides it's unpleasant to shoot at the range. Unless a muzzle brake is added and then you got yourself one heck of a shooter. personally I would take a 300winmag and a 200grn bullet instead of the 338, but the 30-06 and 308 compliment each other and I will stick with them. With those two calibers I figure there's nothing that's gettin away, at least the animals I hunt that is.
Rattle'em up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 07:36 PM   #89
Senior Member
 
Phil Lozano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: June-Dec. Arusha, TZ~Dec.-June PSL, FL.
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuak View Post
IMO the more expansion you get from your round the better. Barnes triple shock solid copper bullets expand in an x pattern and to not come apart when it hits the animal so the mass of the bullet is carried through causing more damage from the bullet itself and also from hydrostatic shock. Federal loads Triple shock as does some other brands that I can't think of off the top of my head.
It is Federal that loads the TSX's.


And regarding your comment on Barnes bullets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bull !

As I have posted here on another topic, I have photos of some catastrophic failures from Barnes bullets over on my site.

Some of the Barnes work, and some don't. The ones that work work OK and the ones that don't, fail totally and completely.

Best,
__________________
Phil Lozano
Phil Lozano Tanzania Trophy Expeditions
Phil Lozano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 12:33 AM   #90
Senior Member
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 593
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattle'em up View Post
I'm with you on this one. Maybey there should be a thread on the 30-06 vs the 7mm remington mag for elk.
NO! HAHAA you would not believe the kind of rats nets that would be turning up. Plus it would be the whole 243. 25-06 argument pretty well all over again. The 7mm mag is better though lol.
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 10:24 AM   #91
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern B.C.
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midas View Post
Bigger bullets anchor bigger game better. That's been my philosophy for many years, and it has held true time and time again.
Holy Moly, there could be hope. Maybe we can get along.
mtm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 08:15 PM   #92
Senior Member
 
Sooner Shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 614
Although we don't have many elk here in Oklahoma I remember once upon a time the little 243 was a legal cartridge for elk. Not any more and it's been many years since it's been legal. At 50 yards or less I have no doubt it would do the job with a good hit. The problem is when you start reaching out it would just be too weak.
__________________
Save the drama for your mama!
Sooner Shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 02:32 PM   #93
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern B.C.
Posts: 85
Best Elk Round

Sorry but the 243 is for crows.
mtm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 08:43 PM   #94
Senior Member
 
Sooner Shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 614
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtm1 View Post
Sorry but the 243 is for crows.
Sorry, but the cannons you're so infatuated with are over kill here in the lower US. The 30/06 will do all that's needed here for elk and it all goes back to shot placement.
__________________
Save the drama for your mama!
Sooner Shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 10:04 PM   #95
Member
 
FISHPOND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 96
Ah, yes caliber loyalty again. The 7mm mag is a great gun and puts the bullet out there with less drop, however I own the 30/06. What can I say I am a sucker for the oldies... Plus it kills every-thing I shot at, including elk.
FISHPOND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 11:56 PM   #96
Senior Member
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 593
Blog Entries: 2
I like the 7mm mag. It is my favourite round at the present time. However i would like to get to know the 338 rum better in the future.
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 08:34 AM   #97
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern B.C.
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sooner Shooter View Post
Sorry, but the cannons you're so infatuated with are over kill here in the lower US. The 30/06 will do all that's needed here for elk and it all goes back to shot placement.
With good shot placement the 06 is fine for Elk, with 200 Gr. bullets I'd take it over the 7MM Mag. 243... not so much.
mtm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2008, 09:40 AM   #98
Senior Member
 
Sooner Shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 614
I'll buy that mtl. I'm glad the 243 is not legal.
__________________
Save the drama for your mama!
Sooner Shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 11:12 PM   #99
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
Go with whatever you are comforable with. Elk are large animals and 1500 ft lbs is about the minimum to stone a good bull. Check your ballistics and when your choice of caliber drops below 1500 ft lbs, You Are Out Of Range. Unless you want to test your tracking skills. I carry an 8mm magnum with 200 grain bullets.
Daniel O'Connel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 PM.


[Output: 109.22 Kb. compressed to 100.71 Kb. by saving 8.50 Kb. (7.79%)]