Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Manufacturers > CZ

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2007, 09:46 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 593
Blog Entries: 2
Still no replies to this???? I would have thought someone would stand up for the mighty Ruger 10-22. lol
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2007, 09:59 PM   #22
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 42
The venerable 10-22 is a fun gun. Easily modified and great fun with a 50rd mag for just whiling the afternoon away at the range or out in the field but its not the most accurate 22 rifle that can be had. You're right, a bolt action is the way to go for max accuracy. Of course, if you want a semi-auto and accuracy, there are still more accurate 22 rifles that can be purchases than the 10-22, sometimes for less money too.
sammoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2007, 11:17 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
DWARREN123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: BETWEEN TN & KY
Posts: 774
For just target I would go with the .17 MachII. More expensive ammo but more accurate, the .22lr is less expensive and more for hunting (in my opinion).
I have CZ's in both and am happy with them.
__________________
Have a nice day!
DWARREN123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 11:30 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
jashoffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 411
It really depends on the 10-22. A 10-22 with a bull barrel and nice scope will put the rounds just about anywhere you want them up to 100 yards. Now there is a lot of cheap .22lr ammo out there and you get what you pay for. If you want to get the most out of your gun spend a few extra bucks and get good match ammo. I would speculate that a 10-22 could shoot nearly as accurately as any any bolt action and the difference would not be noticable to the average shooter. The .17 has it's own problems. Not that I don't like the round, cause I do but it is effected by the wind more than the .22lr
__________________
"I don't go shooting without my guns and they don't go shooting without me!"

Member NRA
jashoffa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 12:10 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 593
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWARREN123 View Post
For just target I would go with the .17 MachII. More expensive ammo but more accurate, the .22lr is less expensive and more for hunting (in my opinion).
I have CZ's in both and am happy with them.
May i ask y u would go with the 17 MachII when the 22lr with good quality bullets such as CCI Stingers gets almost the same accuracy and buffets the wind better? Where i live the difference in ammo price between the !7 Mach II and the 22 Lr is about 3-1. One box of 4-5 doller CCI ammo verses the 10-15 doller MAch II.
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 03:48 PM   #26
Registered User
 
CalvinMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5
I bought the CZ in 17mach2 first...totally fell in love with it, like it way more than my heavy barrel Savage in 17HMR. Then I found a matching 452 in 22LR at BassPro that had gorgeous wood making it a twin to the 17...my plastic was out in a flash...both are 1 holers and I couldn't be happier

P.S. Natchez Shooting Supply, Midsouth shooting Supply and Graf & Sons all have great sales on Mach2 ammo and Graf doesn't charge shipping!

Last edited by CalvinMD; 01-27-2008 at 03:51 PM.
CalvinMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 04:03 PM   #27
spiritual counselor
 
billy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: a secret lab on the shores of lake titicaca
Posts: 12,157
Images: 9
Blog Entries: 146
glad to hear it!
if you are happy i am happy!
__________________
billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 04:59 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 593
Blog Entries: 2
Sounds like a sweet combo, but do you actually get much better performance with a 17mach2 than a 22lr with stingers?
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 07:16 PM   #29
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
I currently own a CZ 100 in 9mm. I'm not sure what to think of the unusually long and heavy trigger pull yet. I was told by a CZ rep that it has been discontinued. I don't know what the selling point of it was but it lacked basic options like night sights,different finishes, and a magazine capacity over 12 for 9mm. I think this could have been a better gun if the folks a CZ listened more to its consumers. Plus the rail could only accomadate the CZ laser sight which I was told is pricey$$.I like the ergonomics but it could use a little better checkering pattern and a beefier grip for bigger hands like mine. Anyone own one ? Please tell me what you think.

Last edited by Mr.Marcus; 05-20-2008 at 07:23 PM.
Mr.Marcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 11:25 PM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
I,m paying $6.90/50 for the 17M2, still not to bad for 50 rounds.
Tulsa1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 11:32 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
tippmann7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Attica, Ohio
Posts: 847
im paying $13 for 50 rounds in my .17hmr, sorry for being off topic but just to compare
__________________
you cannot kill what you did not create
tippmann7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:01 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnumsrule View Post
Sounds like a sweet combo, but do you actually get much better performance with a 17mach2 than a 22lr with stingers?
I have wondered this myself but never contested the two at the range. I know the 17M2 is very accurate and carries a mighty punch at 100yds. M2 will easily reach out past 100.

Now I have something to explore next time at the range.
Zen900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:07 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
GlockMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 5,500
Personally, if this rifle will primarily be for target shooting, go with .22lr. The .17 Mach 2 isn't all that cheap and you'll get a lot, a ton more target shooting in with .22lr.
Example. .17 Mach 2 box of 50 at Bass Pro is $7.49. A box of 50 .22lr at Bass Pro, $3-$4 bucks. I just picked one store for the $7.49, if not cheaper, then the .17 Mach 2 costs.

http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/st...004000_400-4-2

http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10151_-1_10001_28631____SearchResults
__________________
I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6!

Last edited by GlockMeister; 08-06-2008 at 12:14 AM.
GlockMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 09:42 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
Deep13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 203
Cost and availability strongly favor 0.22LR. Unless you have some specific need for the faster, tiny rounds, .22 is the obvious choice.

I saw a few of those at a local shop. Very nice.
Deep13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 AM.


[Output: 87.30 Kb. compressed to 80.79 Kb. by saving 6.51 Kb. (7.46%)]