Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2010, 03:18 AM   #1
Firearm Zealot
 
Iron_Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington St.
Posts: 4,777
7.62 NATO Enfields

Out of curiosity, when and who made 7.62 NATO Enfields? Was there much of a transition period, or conversions from .303 to 7.62? Was this an Indian only thing? Or did the English ever produce any in this caliber, or convert them?
__________________
Mosin Nagant evangelist on a mission to convert YOU!
Iron_Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 09:30 AM   #2
Firearm Enthusiast
 
MJ11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 490
;)

Quote:       Originally Posted by Iron_Colonel View Post
Out of curiosity, when and who made 7.62 NATO Enfields? Was there much of a transition period, or conversions from .303 to 7.62? Was this an Indian only thing? Or did the English ever produce any in this caliber, or convert them?
Canadian armours and British programs converted rifles for match use and to test the possibility of conversion call the L8 I think. Don't for get the best one done was the L42A1.



MJ11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 01:04 AM   #3
Firearm Zealot
 
frenchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northen CA.
Posts: 2,243
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:       Originally Posted by MJ11 View Post
Canadian armours and British programs converted rifles for match use and to test the possibility of conversion call the L8 I think. Don't for get the best one done was the L42A1.



Oh all cased up, each piece in it's special place....my eyes my eyes!
frenchy
frenchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 09:18 AM   #4
Firearm Aficionado
 
timberlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 539
For service it was a transition with the forming of the Nato Alliance and standardizing the 7.62nato round.
The Canadian DCRA ( Dominion of Canada Rifle Association ) rifles were converted .303brit No'4's for match.
Then there's the rifles actually produced as 7.62nato.
Brits came out with the L39 , L42 , Envoy and the Enforcer.
India produced the 2A , 2A1
Here's a good site for info
The Lee-Enfield Rifle
1968 RFI 2A1

Last edited by timberlord; 09-07-2010 at 09:25 AM.
timberlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 10:30 AM   #5
Firearm Zealot
 
Paul T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mounds Ok
Posts: 2,926
Quote:       Originally Posted by frenchy View Post
Oh all cased up, each piece in it's special place....my eyes my eyes!
frenchy
Some people are ill like that Dale. You can't help them much.
__________________
Come,take them
Paul T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 11:40 PM   #6
Firearm Zealot
 
frenchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northen CA.
Posts: 2,243
Blog Entries: 1
Yea it's sad huh Paul.


frenchy
frenchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 01:18 AM   #7
Firearm Zealot
 
Iron_Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington St.
Posts: 4,777
Thanks timber, much appreciated
__________________
Mosin Nagant evangelist on a mission to convert YOU!
Iron_Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 10:46 AM   #8
Firearm Enthusiast
 
MJ11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 490
Sorry I won't do it again. If I could edit it I would delete the pictures. Maybe you could ask someone to pull them.

Last edited by MJ11; 09-08-2010 at 10:48 AM.
MJ11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 12:15 PM   #9
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 172
MJ, please don't delete the photos - it gives the rest of us something to strive for
spinecracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 08:09 PM   #10
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Edward horton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pennsyltucky U.S.A.
Posts: 258
The Australians were the first to do a trial on converting the No.1 to *7.62/.308 which would have required different grade steel and heat treating. The Indians used the information gained and learned by the Australians for their Ishapore 7.62 Enfields.

NOTE: An oiled proof pressure test cartridge delivers twice the bolt thrust (force) to the bolt and locking lugs. To this day the British military still tests its small arms with oiled proof test cartridges which subjects the firearm to the worst possible field conditions.

*There is less than 2,000 CUP difference between the 7.62 NATO and the .308 Winchester. The European CIP the equivalent of the American SAAMI considers these two cartridges to be the same.








Edward horton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 10:07 PM   #11
Firearm Aficionado
 
timberlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 539
Oiled proof pressure ?
timberlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 10:49 PM   #12
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Edward horton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pennsyltucky U.S.A.
Posts: 258
Quote:       Originally Posted by timberlord View Post
Oiled proof pressure ?
Timberlord

Prior to the .303 Enfield being proof pressure tested the headspace was set as close to .064 as possible. After proof testing the Enfield was checked with a .067 headspace gauge, if the bolt closed on the .067 gauge the rifle failed proof testing due to excessive bolt lug setback.

The oil proof round was used to seat the bolt head and bolt lugs to the receiver as the oil round exerts twice normal bolt thrust. It was also used to to exert the maximum thrust on the bolt that could happen in the field. (firing with a wet chamber or wet ammunition)

The British used a different copper crusher method where the copper crusher was located at the very rear of the cartridge (axial thrust vs radial thrust)







There are uniformed people in our gun forums who tell you to grease or lube your cartridge cases to fireform them or oil them for other misinformed reasons.

The British Military in 1929 said do not oil or lube your ammo and the U.S. Military repeated it in 2008.



The effects of excess bolt thrust caused by oil in the chamber.



Edward horton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2010, 05:25 AM   #13
Firearm Aficionado
 
timberlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 539
Thx Ed !!
You just taught a ol'dog something new
timberlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 09:27 AM   #14
Firearm Zealot
 
gandog56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 18,975
Didn't the Israelis also convert a bunch?
__________________
People think I'm paranoid because I own guns. If I own guns, what do I have to be paranoid about?
gandog56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 08:18 PM   #15
Firearm Aficionado
 
timberlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 539
Not sure about Enfields but the Israelis did convert alot of K98's to 7.62nato
timberlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 10:59 PM   #16
Firearm Zealot
 
frenchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northen CA.
Posts: 2,243
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:       Originally Posted by MJ11 View Post
Sorry I won't do it again. If I could edit it I would delete the pictures. Maybe you could ask someone to pull them.
Just kiddin MJ i LOVE the pictures!!!!!!!
frenchy
frenchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2010, 12:19 AM   #17
Firearm Zealot
 
Iron_Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington St.
Posts: 4,777
I'd like to get hold of an Isreli convert. Saw a couple at a pawn shop, but they were ridiculously overpriced. They are still there.
__________________
Mosin Nagant evangelist on a mission to convert YOU!
Iron_Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2010, 11:11 AM   #18
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Edward horton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pennsyltucky U.S.A.
Posts: 258
Quote:       Originally Posted by timberlord View Post
Thx Ed !!
You just taught a ol'dog something new
timberlord

The British War Office "Textbook of Small Arms" is a wealth of information on small arms and the Enfield rifle. If you look at the chamber pressures of the .303 the early cartridges started at 16 tsi, through 17 tsi, to 18.5 tsi. In American english 18.5 tsi is approximately 45,000 CUP or 49,000 PSI or the last "rated chamber pressure" for the Enfield rifle.

Now here is the kicker, American SAAMI commercial .303 ammunition is loaded to less than 43,000 CUP due to the "older" Enfields sill being used today. This is due to the "lower" chamber pressure ratings of the earlier Enfields, (16 and 17 tsi or Tons Square inch)

In a nutshell this is why when American SAAMI commercial .303 ammunition is reloaded to over 43,000 CUP the cartridge cases fall apart and case head separations occur. In short our American commercial cases are NOT designed to British military specification and are designed for lower pressures.
Edward horton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2010, 11:24 AM   #19
Firearm Enthusiast
 
MJ11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 490
;)

Quote:       Originally Posted by frenchy View Post
Just kiddin MJ i LOVE the pictures!!!!!!!
frenchy
As long as paul-t is no longer offended and peace rules the land again life is good.

Maybe some day you will have a go at my L42.

Cheers

MJ11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2010, 11:33 AM   #20
Firearm Zealot
 
ChaZam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Texas
Posts: 5,197
Quote:       Originally Posted by frenchy View Post
Just kiddin MJ i LOVE the pictures!!!!!!!
frenchy
I'm like Frenchy, I like the pics MJ. I always enjoy the eye candy/gun porn.

Last edited by ChaZam; 09-12-2010 at 12:01 PM.
ChaZam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > Firearms > Military Firearms > Enfield Rifles

Tags
762, enfields, nato

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West