Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Handgun

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2003, 06:28 PM   #1
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb .38 Special Versus .380 ACP

I love arguments like this...Say a Sig Sauer model 232 in .380 ACP against a Smith & Wesson J Frame snubnose revolver...I don't want to hear any idiotic .45 ACP nonsense either..:target:
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2003, 07:42 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
practical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, LA/Casper, WY
Posts: 736
What a silly question. The 38spl is more reliable, more powerful, and holds almost as many.
__________________
Eric

"The secret to life is honesty and fair dealing, if you can fake that you've got it made"
practical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2003, 01:07 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Calvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,996
.38 Special is the winner here. No contest...
__________________
I've gone to look for myself. If I should return before I get back, please ask me to wait.
Calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 03:25 PM   #4
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
there are an awful lot of people who carry the .380
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 03:49 PM   #5
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
it's funny that nobody ever points out that John Moses Browning also had a hand in designing the .25 ACP, .32 ACP and .380 ACP cartridges. I wonder if it's a conspiracy from the .45 ACP fans
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 03:50 PM   #6
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
btw ACP stands for Automatic Colt Pistol
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 05:26 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Louisville Kentucky.
Posts: 316
I like both. I have to say I have more .380s than 38 specials but there is a home for both. For me personally I carry the .380 more but my house guns are usually 38 specials since I live in an apartment and don't want to go through wall after wall after wall.
Roy Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 08:38 PM   #8
FEG
Senior Member
 
FEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Behind the Iron Curtain
Posts: 517
I thought that ACP stood for:

"Awww, Crap! Phillipinos!"


(A reference to the Moros' alleged role in the adoption of .45 ACP. Phillipinos need not get upset.)


.38 Special, no contest. If there were not so many decent, inexpensive .380 pistols available, then .380 would have died off in the US by now. Back in the day, it had an advantage in that .380s were just as small as a .32, but much more powerful. Now, there are several 9mms on the market that are as small (or even smaller) than a PP/PPK clone.

No one points out Browning's role in the development of 9mm Browning Long, .38 ACP, .25 ACP, or .32 ACP because they are either a) already obsolete and virtually unknown today OR b) well on their way to obscurity. Currently, most manufacturers only offer one .25 ACP load, if any.
__________________
WARNING: CZs MAY BE HABIT-FORMING (Consult a doctor if nursing or pregnant).
FEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 09:14 PM   #9
Member
 
einnor1040's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: middle tn.
Posts: 86
38 special. Duh!
:nod:
einnor1040 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2003, 11:39 PM   #10
Super Moderator
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 8,592
Images: 1
38 special is good in a small revolver or in a small 357 if you don't want a but recoil. the 380 serves its purpose as a light weight defense pistol round in a small flat gun. I carry 357's 45's 9mm and 40 and all are great and would trust my defense to either or all
__________________
"Homeland Security is the responsibility of an armed citizen" ME
http://webpages.charter.net/s.s.v/
Shaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 09:50 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
NRAJOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 19,043
Images: 3
Re: .38 Special Versus .380 ACP

Quote:
Originally posted by logansdad
I love arguments like this...Say a Sig Sauer model 232 in .380 ACP against a Smith & Wesson J Frame snubnose revolver...I don't want to hear any idiotic .45 ACP nonsense either..:target:
.45ACP....:gangster:
__________________
U.S. Army
1976-1979
237th Combat Engineers
Heilbronn, Germany
NRAJOE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 05:29 PM   #12
FEG
Senior Member
 
FEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Behind the Iron Curtain
Posts: 517
Quote:
I carry 357's 45's 9mm and 40 and all are great and would trust my defense to either or all
Funny. All of those are considerably more powerful than .380!!!
__________________
WARNING: CZs MAY BE HABIT-FORMING (Consult a doctor if nursing or pregnant).
FEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2003, 08:00 PM   #13
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
do you have a .45ACP there Joe ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 08:07 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
"Three .45 caliber casings were also located near the scene of the murder. The presence of these casings, along with eyewitness evidence, suggests a second shooter was positioned across the street from Cotton. However, it is undisputed Cotton was shot with a .380 caliber gun. " - Taken from here.
gwarokk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:08 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Poteet, Texas
Posts: 1,276
John Browning was a genius gun designer, he was not a gunfighter. He designed some real nice mouse guns, none of which I would use in a gunfight.
Mike Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:15 PM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,085
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logansdad View Post
I love arguments like this...Say a Sig Sauer model 232 in .380 ACP against a Smith & Wesson J Frame snubnose revolver...I don't want to hear any idiotic .45 ACP nonsense either..:target:
The .380 produces slightly more power than a .38 Spec out of a snubby.

The belief that revolvers in general are more reliable than auto loaders is urban legend.
mitch_mckee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:37 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cobra Command Headquarters
Posts: 781
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch_mckee View Post
The .380 produces slightly more power than a .38 Spec out of a snubby.

Check again Mitch, I'm pretty sure that's wrong. The .380 is a 90 grain bullet at around 900 fps , .38 Special with a heavier 125 grain should get the same velocity, give or take. A 158 grain bullet may do 800 FPS, that's got to have much more energy than the .380 can deliver in any load.

Last edited by Taurus Fan; 05-11-2008 at 02:55 PM.
Taurus Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:57 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,437
Well, . . .

. . . . each cartridge has a long history and the facts are many shooters over the decades have chosen the .38 special as the preferred cartridge of the two.

This is not to say the .380 ACP is without merit. However, it is a cartridge that has never gained a great level of popularity even among
semi-auto fans. It has, however, hung on with enough demand to stay in production.

So, if I were you I would listen to the lesson of history.
nathangdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:59 PM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,085
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taurus Fan View Post
Check again Mitch, I'm pretty sure that's wrong. The .380 is a 90 grain bullet at around 900 fps , .38 Special with a heavier 125 grain should get the same velocity, give or take. A 158 grain bullet may do 800 FPS, that's got to have much energy more than the .380 can deliver in any load.
The .38 Spec was made for at least 4" of barrel. It loses a considerable amount of velocity in a 2" bbl. +P ammo can make some difference, but many snubbies are not +P rated)

Here are some snubby ballistics:

.38 Special Snubnose Ballistics

and the .380:

Remington.com - Products - Ammunition - Ballistics

For comparison, see the 110 grain .38 Spec velocities at about 860 fps. vs the .380 102 grain at 940 fps.

For reference, the .38 Spec with a 110 grain bullet from a 5" bbl. travels at 950+/- fps.

Remington.com - Products - Ammunition - Ballistics
mitch_mckee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 03:06 PM   #20
Lost in the Ozone Again
 
TXplt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,776
Images: 4
Blog Entries: 2
Absolutely hands-down .38 special. More energy and stopping power (unless for some reason you just happen to shoot the 380 oh so much better than the .38). Cor-Bon and Buffalo Bore make good +P rounds, the BB +P 158 GR LSWHP gets better than 950 FPS from a 2" s+w model 40 (most all new .38's are +P rated as well).

The only reason I can see personally for the .380 (other than the James Bond "fun" factor of the PPK) is for pistols like the new Ruger--tiny and flat. I'd rather have a 9mm though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch_mckee View Post
The .380 produces slightly more power than a .38 Spec out of a snubby.

The belief that revolvers in general are more reliable than auto loaders is urban legend.

Uh. Wrong on both counts
__________________
Old fighter pilots never die.....They just wind up in Texas

Last edited by TXplt; 05-11-2008 at 03:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
TXplt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
special, versus, 380, acp

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.


[Output: 105.52 Kb. compressed to 96.81 Kb. by saving 8.70 Kb. (8.25%)]