Like Tree15Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2011, 03:27 AM   #1
Firearm Zealot
 
Palladin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,938
.380 penetrates through 31" of ballistic Gel

Yep you read that right. In the October issue of Shooting Illustrated magazine there is an article where the author tests 14 different SD loads in the S&W Body Guard .380acp. Out of the 14 loads tested the Buffalo Bore+P 100gr Hard Cast LFN penetrated 31"+ through the 10% Gel. Well the standard green and yellow box Remington 88gr hp also penetrated the same but only because they failed to expand at the lower velocity from the small S&W. Now I know from first hand experience that hard cast bullets will penetrate deeper than most other bullets but out of such a little package I wasn't expecting to read 31" of penetration. The article was pretty informative and the author had a theroy of how the .380acp was exactly 75% dimensionally to the .45acp and was designed that way by John Browning.

I know there are going to be those that will say that Ballistic Gel isn't the same as human tissue and actual results would be different but this is one way to see how the bullet will perform in "like" tissue.
Anyway I found this interesting and thought I would share it with you.
TXplt likes this.
Palladin8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:00 AM   #2
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 105
For such a supposed sissy round I'm impressed. I won't be getting rid of my 380's anytime soon.
I like this guys test. Seeing is believing.
jeffr168's Channel - YouTube
growl18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:12 AM   #3
Firearm Zealot
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: big pine key, florida
Posts: 3,841
I am a fan of hard cast bullets. particularlly the semi wad cutter design. I use them for hunting with good results and also use them in my self defence loads when the bullets are availiable. I wish I could find 9mm lswc bullets to load in my 9x19 & .380.
__________________
peace through superior firepower
blaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:13 AM   #4
Firearm Zealot
 
oldjarhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 7,501
Blog Entries: 2
It's entirely ok with me if the little pill penetrates the skin and bounces around inside the perp's body cavity awhile...
Nope, no problem with that at all.

I like the .380 for sd, but I would choose a bigger caliber for a full scale gun fight.

Heck, if James Bond can get by with a .32; I can get by with a .380.

Thanks for the info.
TXplt likes this.
__________________
If ya don't know where I've been and ya don't know where I'm going, your opinions of me don't count.
oldjarhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:26 AM   #5
Firearm Zealot
 
jmp8927's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 5,597
I laugh when people tell me my .380 isn't big enough. I've yet to have anyone volunteer to get shot by one.
jack007, ChaZam and TGF like this.
__________________
Red Patcher
USMCR
jmp8927 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 09:47 AM   #6
TGF
Firearm Zealot
 
TGF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Blair, NE
Posts: 5,155
I keep Hornady CD in my LCP. They have good pen and expansion. 32 inches seems unnecessary unless you are shooting santa clause in the gut. I have always read the ideal SD penetration is between 14 and 16 inches. It will bust up organs and leave most its payload inside the target.
__________________
We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. -Aesop
TGF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 09:58 AM   #7
Firearm Zealot
 
ChaZam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Texas
Posts: 10,381
Quote:       Originally Posted by jmp8927 View Post
I laugh when people tell me my .380 isn't big enough. I've yet to have anyone volunteer to get shot by one.
Right, we don't see any of the naysayers lining up to take hits from a 380, or a 32, or a 25, a 22 etc do we?
Don357 likes this.
__________________
Rex
ChaZam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 10:08 AM   #8
Firearm Zealot
 
jmp8927's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 5,597
I don't like getting hit by a bb gun let alone an actual firearm! Dead is dead, regardless of the size of the projectile that causes it.
Don357 likes this.
__________________
Red Patcher
USMCR
jmp8927 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 10:50 AM   #9
Firearm Zealot
 
BarryHalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florence, AL
Posts: 6,844
Blog Entries: 8
I've been pushing Buffalo Bore for a while. Their SD loads are VERY impressive for short barreled pistols. They outdo the rest on pure power. I'd love to see them use some HSTs or other heavy duty HPs. The 9mm HSTs would be about right for their .380 and .38spl +P loads.

I've been thinking about this:

http://www.buffalobore.com/index.php...t_detail&p=214

for bear defense/auto glass for a while now. I'd like the same thing in TMJ though. Anyone know of something about like that? 250+gr, P+ FMJ?
TXplt likes this.
__________________
Get the largest caliber you can fire accurately, rapidly, in the largest gun useful for the purpose.

Last edited by BarryHalls; 10-03-2011 at 10:55 AM.
BarryHalls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 03:07 PM   #10
Firearm Aficionado
 
ouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hard woods - next to a pond in Missouri
Posts: 646
Cast bullets are great. I haven't shot to see how many water bottles or gelatin but I do shoot into most of the time 1.25-1.75" of wood and then into my paper and tire back stop. They cut nice holes and deform. Just started shooting 125 grain swc's sized to 356 in a PPK.
__________________
...911, Government sponsored dial-a-prayer...
1911, Government sponsored answer to your prayers.
ouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 03:20 AM   #11
Gun Toting Boeing Driver
 
TXplt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 8,677
I alternate the BB JHP and HC rounds in my 238--wasn't much of a .380 fan a while back but this gun gives .38 snubbie ballistics, is flat, accurate, has a decent trigger and nice sights, a mini-1911, and easy to carry in the summer. The HC are good if you don't get enough penetration from the JHP, and I fully believe the numbers you said; BB ammo in some calibers is pretty impressive. DO function test it in YOUR gun, though (it works fine in my .380).
__________________
In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit -- John Galt
TXplt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 12:48 PM   #12
Learn or else!
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: near Funk, Ohio
Posts: 8,559
The .380 is also known as the 9mm Kurz or short. It served for a great many years as the premier LE round in many European countries. It is not something to be taken lightly.

America being America, we always tend to think bigger is better. While this may be true some of the time, it is definitely not true all of the time, and the .380 is a case in point.

Yeah, a 9x19 can hit harder than the .380, as can many other rounds. But the .380 can be had in smaller lighter and more easily concealed and handled weapons, hence it's extreme popularity with the concealed carry crowd.
k-80 and BarryHalls like this.
__________________
Teach

ALL
who work for a living must vote to outvote those who vote for a living.
DaTeacha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 01:52 AM   #13
Firearm Zealot
 
Palladin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,938
There are certainly better calibers out there for self defense. .380 isn't my first choice in a defensive situation either but I have no problem carrying one for personal protection either.
I just found it hard to believe that such a small caliber could penetrate that much. It goes to show that you shouldn't under estimate pipsqueks.
Palladin8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 12:41 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 789
Quote:       Originally Posted by ChaZam View Post
Right, we don't see any of the naysayers lining up to take hits from a 380, or a 32, or a 25, a 22 etc do we?
I would take a .32 either in the original Walther PP or PPK or PPK/S over the .380 in auto.

I would take a .32 SW Long (New Police Cobra) along with a .38 (Cobra) in revolver over .380 or anything listed above.

The .380 in the Walther PP series (PP, PPK, PPK/S) is unreliable in .380 which was an afterthought.

The .32 or .38 revolver has sufficient power less auto malfunction statistics for me to rather rely upon a revolver and forget the small pocket auto.

Use the small pocket revolver in .32 or .38 and be safe.
Piper17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 01:43 PM   #15
Firearm Zealot
 
BarryHalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florence, AL
Posts: 6,844
Blog Entries: 8
I'd trust my life to anything with a great name brand on it, semi, revolver, derringer, etc. I'd even trust lesser brands with simpler pistols, like a revolver. I could write a long list, but I'll leave it at that.
__________________
Get the largest caliber you can fire accurately, rapidly, in the largest gun useful for the purpose.
BarryHalls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 03:31 PM   #16
Firearm Aficionado
 
ouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hard woods - next to a pond in Missouri
Posts: 646
The PPKs is fine with the 380. I have 3 in 380 and 2 in 32. I have one 380 that was not as reliable because of the feed ramp. It is fine after having it worked on. The new PPKs weapons are excellent IMO. I have a German 1945 PP in 32acp which I way overload. I am shooting 90 grains at 900fps. I wouldn't shoot them that hard in a newer keltec. I shoot cast in it. It is point of aim.

The only drawback is that they are are an older design trying to compete against modern ultralight designs.


Quote:       Originally Posted by Piper17 View Post
I would take a .32 either in the original Walther PP or PPK or PPK/S over the .380 in auto.

I would take a .32 SW Long (New Police Cobra) along with a .38 (Cobra) in revolver over .380 or anything listed above.

The .380 in the Walther PP series (PP, PPK, PPK/S) is unreliable in .380 which was an afterthought.

The .32 or .38 revolver has sufficient power less auto malfunction statistics for me to rather rely upon a revolver and forget the small pocket auto.

Use the small pocket revolver in .32 or .38 and be safe.
__________________
...911, Government sponsored dial-a-prayer...
1911, Government sponsored answer to your prayers.
ouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 03:54 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 789
Quote:       Originally Posted by ouch View Post
The PPKs is fine with the 380. I have 3 in 380 and 2 in 32. I have one 380 that was not as reliable because of the feed ramp. It is fine after having it worked on. The new PPKs weapons are excellent IMO. I have a German 1945 PP in 32acp which I way overload. I am shooting 90 grains at 900fps. I wouldn't shoot them that hard in a newer keltec. I shoot cast in it. It is point of aim.

The only drawback is that they are are an older design trying to compete against modern ultralight designs.
A reliable .380 in PPK or PPK/S is worth keeping and exceptionally worthy of posting on any forum. I had 4 or 5 PPK or PPK/S's in .380 and I had one that I bought 5 extra magazines for because it worked every time. It was an SW Houlton model with the extended spur under the hammer and it worked EVERYTIME I am not kidding and I loved it. One day I went out and shot it and it malfunctioned at least once per magazine and then I lost my dream of owning a .380 in PPK/S or any other Walther PP series not the recent plastic models but the real Walther models of PP fame.

Then I got a Manhurin PP in .32 which I did later sell only for monetary reasons. It was perfect as a Walther type as well as all German Walthers I've owned in .32.

Later I ran into a gunsmith who told me the .380 was an "afterthought" to the .32 ACP in the Walther PP or PPK or PPK/S and it all made sense to me.

I would not trust a .380 in a Walther PP or PPK or PPK/S for the simple reason it is an afterthought like the .40 SW in a Browning Hi Power or CZ-75 or Beretta M9.

Bigger is not always better. What is better is perfect function. Accuracy is nothing without perfect function.

Last edited by Piper17; 10-05-2011 at 03:56 PM.
Piper17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 04:25 PM   #18
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Palm Harbor Florida
Posts: 115
WOW Im sad now. I have owned many handguns from colts, beretta, and sig (never any glocks) and I now own a walther pk380. I have so far LOVED it better than any of those I just mention. 1. its very light 2. NEVER one jam in it 3. Looks are appealing 4. Every gun store owner here that I have deault with said for the money are absolutly awesome firearm with no customer complaints or returns. and 5. did I mention Light. I have a mmp 40 s&w and it isnt not accurate as my walther at 24-50 yards no matter what ammo I feed
hunter081 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 04:27 PM   #19
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Palm Harbor Florida
Posts: 115
Sorry I need spell check
hunter081 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 04:31 PM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 789
Quote:       Originally Posted by hunter081 View Post
WOW Im sad now. I have owned many handguns from colts, beretta, and sig (never any glocks) and I now own a walther pk380. I have so far LOVED it better than any of those I just mention. 1. its very light 2. NEVER one jam in it 3. Looks are appealing 4. Every gun store owner here that I have deault with said for the money are absolutly awesome firearm with no customer complaints or returns. and 5. did I mention Light. I have a mmp 40 s&w and it isnt not accurate as my walther at 24-50 yards no matter what ammo I feed
Then go with that pistol. It was made right and it works.
Piper17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun and Game - Firearms Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Handgun

Tags
380 penetrates through 31, ballistic, gel

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gunfire penetrates ElPaso City hall building Deersniper The Powder Keg 17 07-03-2010 09:22 PM
Went Ballistic. blueice The Powder Keg 4 09-25-2009 08:19 PM
ballistic calculator billy The Powder Keg 2 12-24-2008 07:34 PM
opinions on ballistic tip fishnfool1991 The Powder Keg 5 05-09-2008 07:05 AM
Ballistic Coefficient Despoiler The Powder Keg 1 05-10-2005 02:10 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.




Recent Discussions

Proud Sponsors


NRA NETWORK



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West