Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Handgun



Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2005, 11:49 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
Millitary dumping the Baretta92 !

check this link out, I heard about it from my friend and G&G member in OCS school.

"Dump the M9 and pack a 45"
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 05:48 AM   #2
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

Cover Story

Back to the future
Soldiers have been saying it for two decades — get rid of the M9 and go back to a .45 caliber. Now Army weapons developers want to do just that. (For subscribers only)
  Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 06:34 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Too Dang Hot, Arizona
Posts: 4,288
Key here is the weapons developers want it but it might boil down to who (and what companies) Congressmen and Army officials have a financial interest in and "loyalty" to.

I side with the .45 ACP.
__________________
"It confuses me how some people can vigorously go against the 2nd. Amendment and still call themselves patriotic"-me
Dale is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 07:13 AM   #4
PUKHA DAWG
 
Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia, just outside of Washington D.C.
Posts: 3,760
About time. I doubt they'll go with the 1911, wonder which .45 will get the nod?
Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 03:02 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Too Dang Hot, Arizona
Posts: 4,288
I sure hope NOT Glock!

Thinking maybe Springfield.
__________________
"It confuses me how some people can vigorously go against the 2nd. Amendment and still call themselves patriotic"-me
Dale is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 03:39 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
silentknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale
Thinking maybe Springfield.
I highly doubt this, I don't see the armed forces going to .45 GAP, or at least I hope not. I would love to see xd's in our servicemen and women's hands, but only if they came out with a 45 ACP platform, and I don't see that happening.

Would a H&K USP be plausible?
__________________
Sic Vis Pacem Parabellum

Last edited by silentknight; 07-07-2005 at 03:42 PM.
silentknight is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 04:17 PM   #7
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

wish they'd pick domestic contractors
  Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 06:05 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
I was told that the article mentioned 3 manufacturers and I can only remember 2
One was Sig and the other H&K. The third was I think Hi Point..... Just kidding I cant remember the third.
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 06:48 PM   #9
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJake
I was told that the article mentioned 3 manufacturers and I can only remember 2
One was Sig and the other H&K. The third was I think Hi Point..... Just kidding I cant remember the third.
Kimber ? they've made some 1911A1 pistols for the USMC
  Reply With Quote


Old 07-07-2005, 07:04 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
colt45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Occupied Territories of New York (Buffalo)
Posts: 2,898
acctualy some units have allready been aproved to purchase and carry the ruger 45.
__________________
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity"
-Sigmund Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanalysis

"If guns cause crime, all of mine are defective."
- Ted Nugent

"Self-defense is Nature's eldest law."
-John Dryden
colt45 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-08-2005, 09:20 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Okeefenokee
Posts: 1,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt45
acctualy some units have allready been aproved to purchase and carry the ruger 45.
That's what I've heard.
Thrawn is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-09-2005, 12:52 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
I heard that the gun to replace the m9 is going to be decocker and first shot double action second single... thats the only features I know of.
Excluding special operation units I think the "cocked and locked" days are over. Sad to say.
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-09-2005, 12:58 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Okeefenokee
Posts: 1,613
If those are the specs. Ruger has what they are looking for.



Thrawn is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-09-2005, 01:06 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Okeefenokee
Posts: 1,613
Gauge/Caliber: .45 Auto
Capacity: 8 Rounds
Finish: Blued
Stock/Grip: Black Synthetic
Barrel Length: 4 1/2"
Rear Sight: Fixed
Other Features: Manual Safety / Firing Pin Block
Suggested Retail Price: $ 525.00
Miscellaneous: N/A


Ruger Manual Safety P-Series pistols offer the following features:

** A manual ambidextrous safety that, when engaged, prevents firing unless the lever is returned to the "fire" position.

** Ruger Camblock design that reduces felt recoil and dissipates stress.

** High visibility front and rear sights.

**P95PR and KP95PR models feature a new, textured frame and Picatinny-style accessory rail.

** P345 pistols feature a new frame with checkered grip areas, front-strap, and back-strap, loaded chamber indicator, magazine disconnect, and internal lock.

** KP345PR and P345PR models include a frame-integral Picatinny accessory rail.

**All P-Series pistols are designed to be easily maintained and can be field-stripped into five major subassemblies for cleaning, without the need for special tools.

** 15 - round models not available in all states and locales. 10 - round models are available where required to meet state and local regulations limiting magazine capacity.
Thrawn is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-09-2005, 01:47 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Sniper[MI]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Future 51st state, "New Hope"
Posts: 3,795
Eh, just use a bigger caliber....

BTW, Uncle Sam? I will take all the M9's off yer hands for free. They will be checked and re checked, then sold with 40% of the profits to be returned to the US Military.....with 17 or 18 of the newest kept on hand for personal use/collection...

I am also in aposition to take all the 9mm ammo off your hands for use in the same fashion.......
__________________
FNUH!
Sniper[MI] is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-10-2005, 02:33 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
I am a fan of ruger autos all the way, I have a customized p90 that I shall not part with. And I know first hand that they can shoot right with an H&K.
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-10-2005, 11:24 PM   #17
Member
 
pipsqueak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southwest Washington State
Posts: 78
What's the point? It'll just cost a lot of money to switch. Is there some
reason the .45 is better? I thought they were about equally effective with
good ammo. Even if the .45 is a better stopper with that ball stuff the
military might have to use. 15 shots of 9mm has the potential to go further
than 9 shots of .45. Right? I thought that's what the military has pistols for anyway. For when they run out of rifle ammo, or when the rifle malfunctions.
They can hold more shots of 9mm. I understand the .45 is usually preferred by
consumers like us for personal defense and home defense to the 9mm, but
I think more shots is probably more useful for most military situations. If weight
and bulk weren't an issue they would probably just carry a second rifle as
backup.
pipsqueak is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-13-2005, 01:18 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
The 9mm potential and Mag capacity vs. the .45s potential and Lack of Capacity.
This is always a debate that both the 9mm fans and the .45 fans consider frivolous.
I can see Both sides of the issue, but to post my opinion I would rather tote 3-10 round mags full of Full weight .45 fmj, than 3-15 round mags of 9mm fmj. (considering they pick a decent .45)

afterthought "Heck a back up rifle would be pretty cool too if I could handle the weight."
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.

Last edited by BigJake; 07-13-2005 at 01:21 AM. Reason: Afterthought
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-13-2005, 06:14 AM   #19
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by pipsqueak
What's the point? It'll just cost a lot of money to switch
the Government doesn't care how much of your money it spends
  Reply With Quote


Old 07-13-2005, 10:07 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
Heck if its my money they're spending I hope it goes to a .45 .
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Handgun

Tags
millitary, dumping, baretta92

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM.


[Output: 97.49 Kb. compressed to 86.52 Kb. by saving 10.97 Kb. (11.26%)]