Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Handgun



Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-09-2008, 05:07 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 1,794
Blog Entries: 2
R.I.P. Dan Wesson revolvers

"There will be no production of revolvers in the foreseeable future. The cost of retooling and materials would not be justified by the minimal sales the revolvers would generate."

The official policy of CZ Arms as confirmed by Ken Lawton and Genny Dutcher.
DWFan is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-09-2008, 05:57 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
dmwphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 551
A shame to see this. I have owned several over the years and have always been pleased. I used one in 44 mag to compete in IHMSA matches (way back when)
dmwphoto is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-09-2008, 06:50 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
KW Gary M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Key West Florida
Posts: 7,155
Blog Entries: 1
Sad to see them go but I bet the value will go up for sure. Pick one up now if you can.
__________________
To Say Guns Kill People Is To Say Automobiles Drive Drunk and Matches Commit Arson.
KW Gary M is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-09-2008, 11:16 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
runfiverun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: soda springs idaho
Posts: 804
i have been hoping they would return as i really want a 414 for hunting.
guess the 375 and 445 will have to do.
runfiverun is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-12-2008, 12:12 PM   #5
Member
 
Gator Amos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New albany IN, born in Harrodsburg KY
Posts: 19
50/50

I'm upset about this on one hand because I own one and I love everything about except pushing that pin back in after a cylinder or so of rounds. But, I suppose, if the value goes up I can't be that upset.
Gator Amos is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-12-2008, 03:48 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,056
Well, these guns did have their fans

but market share just did not materialize. It is just a risk of launching a new product in a market already saturated with guns and cartridges.
nathangdad is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-12-2008, 08:20 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
roverboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moss,Tn.
Posts: 1,692
They are super accurate guns. Two friends have owned them and they were fine guns. One was a 10" barreled .357 magmum.
__________________
"You gonna pull them pistols or whistle Dixie?
Outlaw Josie Wales
roverboy is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-12-2008, 08:25 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 1,794
Blog Entries: 2
I think it's a sign of the times, nathangdad. A lot of the younger shooters I've seen aren't interested in revolvers because they don't hold enough ammo and they believe a 3" group at 25 yards is "tight". Revolvers are considered an "old timer's" weapon; I've been quoted the line ("A lot of old-timers carry those.") out of Lethal Weapon more times than I can count. Heaven forbid that you shoot a single action; they consider that something right out of the Stone Age.
DWFan is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-12-2008, 08:31 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 254
People just don't understand the value of revolvers. Very strong, very reliable, and jamming (what's that?)
couchtr26 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-12-2008, 10:23 PM   #10
Member
 
Gator Amos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New albany IN, born in Harrodsburg KY
Posts: 19
It's those "Gawngstas"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWFan View Post
I think it's a sign of the times, nathangdad. A lot of the younger shooters I've seen aren't interested in revolvers because they don't hold enough ammo and they believe a 3" group at 25 yards is "tight". Revolvers are considered an "old timer's" weapon; I've been quoted the line ("A lot of old-timers carry those.") out of Lethal Weapon more times than I can count. Heaven forbid that you shoot a single action; they consider that something right out of the Stone Age.

I have encountered this quite a bit. I love my .44mag. Never jams, no failure to load, and no failure to fire.
As for the holding more ammo, if you can't take someone down with six shots (especialy with a .44mag. You wont need them all) YOU SHOULDN'T FIRE A WEAPON!

Last edited by Gator Amos; 10-12-2008 at 10:25 PM.
Gator Amos is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-13-2008, 12:19 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gator Amos View Post
As for the holding more ammo, if you can't take someone down with six shots (especialy with a .44mag. You wont need them all) YOU SHOULDN'T FIRE A WEAPON!

My thoughts exactly.
dodge310 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-13-2008, 01:58 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Intercoastal Sea Islands, SC, USA
Posts: 3,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWFan View Post
I think it's a sign of the times, nathangdad. A lot of the younger shooters I've seen aren't interested in revolvers because they don't hold enough ammo and they believe a 3" group at 25 yards is "tight". Revolvers are considered an "old timer's" weapon; I've been quoted the line ("A lot of old-timers carry those.") out of Lethal Weapon more times than I can count. Heaven forbid that you shoot a single action; they consider that something right out of the Stone Age.
I saw it happening years ago when we transitioned from service revolvers to service autos in law enforcement. A lot of the younger officers in our classes were chomping at the bit for the new issue weapons at a time when auto pistols and auto pistol calibers themselves were evolving rapidly; probably not the best time to transition. To this day, I can still shoot the timed instructors course with a Smith & Wesson medium frame service revolver shooting a better and tighter score than I could with an auto pistol. A well tuned .45 Government auto might come close.
SightNSqueeze is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-13-2008, 04:05 PM   #13
Member
 
RgrNo1Shtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 60
Let them go chase the autoloaders, that means more revolvers at better prices for those of us who love'em!
__________________
I like a handgun. I hold a shotgun in high regard; rifles-well, I love the darn things
J. O'Connor
RgrNo1Shtr is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-14-2008, 12:15 AM   #14
Member
 
Gator Amos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New albany IN, born in Harrodsburg KY
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by RgrNo1Shtr View Post
Let them go chase the autoloaders, that means more revolvers at better prices for those of us who love'em!
I didn't think of that. Yeah let'em have'em.
Gator Amos is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-14-2008, 01:02 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
roverboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moss,Tn.
Posts: 1,692
I prefer revolvers over autoloaders. I got a Ruger Sec. Six that has been like a rock.
__________________
"You gonna pull them pistols or whistle Dixie?
Outlaw Josie Wales
roverboy is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-16-2008, 05:02 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Deep13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 722
The cost of labor is doing them all in. Revolvers are hard to make. They actually have more moving parts than an automatic. First Colt, now DW. I'm pretty confident Ruger is not going to quit any time soon. Neither will SW.
Deep13 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-16-2008, 06:46 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
GUNZABLAZIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Blufton,Indiana
Posts: 518
I HAVE A MODEL 15-2 VH, 6" BBL. I PICKED UP AN 8" HEAVY DRILLED AND TAPPED FOR A SCOPE AT A LOCAL GUNSHOP, BOUGHT A 10" HV BBL OUT OF THE LOCAL ADVERTISER PAPER, AND THEN BOUGHT A 2" HV BBL AT A GUNSHOW. I PAID ABOUT A TOTAL OF $410 FOR EVERTHING. HECKUVA GOOD PRICE FOR A (PISTOL PAC). I ALSO HUNT WHITETAIL WITH A TC CONTENDER IN A .445 SUPER MAG. LOVE THAT CAL.
GUNZABLAZIN is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-17-2008, 01:03 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
roverboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moss,Tn.
Posts: 1,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUNZABLAZIN View Post
I HAVE A MODEL 15-2 VH, 6" BBL. I PICKED UP AN 8" HEAVY DRILLED AND TAPPED FOR A SCOPE AT A LOCAL GUNSHOP, BOUGHT A 10" HV BBL OUT OF THE LOCAL ADVERTISER PAPER, AND THEN BOUGHT A 2" HV BBL AT A GUNSHOW. I PAID ABOUT A TOTAL OF $410 FOR EVERTHING. HECKUVA GOOD PRICE FOR A (PISTOL PAC). I ALSO HUNT WHITETAIL WITH A TC CONTENDER IN A .445 SUPER MAG. LOVE THAT CAL.
Nice collection. You ought to hang on to the Dan Wessons.
__________________
"You gonna pull them pistols or whistle Dixie?
Outlaw Josie Wales
roverboy is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-17-2008, 12:21 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 138
I'm with you revolver guys. Let'um have their auto's. The laughing stops when I bring in targets with really small groups, some holes overlapping, shot with a Super Blackhawk or GP-100. My GP recvently saved me from myself. Made a mistake in handloading. Charged a 357 with 15 gr. Blue Dot instead of 10.5. Nearly a 500% overcharge. The primer was blown out of the case and jammed the action. Cleared the action, loaded with known good loads and went right on shooting. Let's see a plastic auto stand up to that abuse. Thank you Bill Ruger.
I too love the long magnums like 357 Maximum, made opular by the Dan Wessons. They wil be missed.
Jimbo Indy is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-18-2008, 09:17 AM   #20
Member
 
torasperry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Medina,Tennessee
Posts: 57
Pistol Pac

Gents,
Found an Original Unfired .357 cal DW Pistol pac, Has all the stuff, 2" 4" 6" 8 " barrels, Buckle, Patch, Wooden exchange grip, Wrench, White front site replacement.
Collector had it in his collection.
What is the Pac worth these days.
The Case has yellow lining, Think the Pac is about 20 years old.
Would like to know what it's worth today,
Any Guesses?
torasperry is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Handgun

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.


[Output: 99.30 Kb. compressed to 88.50 Kb. by saving 10.79 Kb. (10.87%)]