Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Rifle

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-24-2006, 01:11 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
at4rxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 856
Images: 10
Rem 710 vs Weatherby Vanguard

Guys, I have the opportunity to do a sell/buy and go from my 7mag 710 to a 270 Weatherby Vanguard synthetic. It's a basic 270, but I'm thinking that it's a better gun.
I'd have to pay about $25. Is it worth doing the swap?
at4rxj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 03:04 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
freakingout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Opelousas, LA
Posts: 118
Indeed. I'd go for it if I were you. Weatherby's a great gun. Nothing wrong with a Remmy, just the 710 most definitely isn't their greatest gun. Not very well made.
freakingout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 03:18 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 144
rem 710 vs we

I got one of those 710 in 30-06, it is very accurate but the action is very rough, I am gonna keep it but you cant go wrong with a weatherby, even one of the cheaper versions.
felix cortinas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 05:47 PM   #4
Mr. Fixit
 
toolman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: abilene,tx
Posts: 5,582
Blog Entries: 22
I'd jump on the Weatherby for the accuracy guarantee alone.
__________________
Don't be messin' with my gun!
toolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:49 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
frozentorso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East Texas
Posts: 592
I love my Jap Weatherby .270.
__________________
"I'm your huckleberry. Thats just my game!"
frozentorso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 10:03 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
myarmor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southwest ,VA
Posts: 1,147
Vanguard.
Between the 2, there's no comparison.
myarmor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 10:34 AM   #7
Super Moderator
 
BattleRifleG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 11,401
Images: 13
I agree on that one completely.
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
BattleRifleG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 08:21 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Pumpkinheaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,340
weatherby
__________________
Just because your paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you!
Pumpkinheaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 02:44 AM   #9
Registered User
 
maroontoad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Katherine, Northern Territory, Australia.
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by at4rxj View Post
Guys, I have the opportunity to do a sell/buy and go from my 7mag 710 to a 270 Weatherby Vanguard synthetic. It's a basic 270, but I'm thinking that it's a better gun.
I'd have to pay about $25. Is it worth doing the swap?
If you haven't swapped yet, pause and have a look at this.
I have a Vanguard fluted stainless synthetic in .308. It is a highly accurate rifle which makes me look good. It does have the following problems, however.
1. The front sling swivel stud pulls out from the plastic if you attempt to tighten a Harris bipod to it.
2. The stainless isn't, it readily rusts in humidity. It also galls and if you need a fast follow up shot the bolt sticks because of that.
3. The bolt stop stud screw tapers to about 1/16th" between the receiver and the screw head. Mine recently broke which left me with a rifle in one hand and the bolt in the other.

Like all things they are built to a price. If you are a range shooter and occasional hunter then they are fine as long as you are prepared to fix the occasional fault. If you are likely to be firing at multiple targets or culling large numbers of animals you may wish that you kept the Remington.

Regards
Snow
maroontoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rem, 710, weatherby, vanguard

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM.


[Output: 68.19 Kb. compressed to 63.56 Kb. by saving 4.63 Kb. (6.79%)]