| | #1 |
| Moderator ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Selma, NC
Posts: 2,223
|
I was watching a show on The Military Channel called "Top Ten Combat Rifles". They ran down their top 10 based on service length, accuracy, combat effectiveness, handling, innovation. Here is their list. 10. M-14 9. Sturmgewehr 44 8. Springfield 1903 7. Steyr AUG 6. Mauser 98K 5. FN/FAL 4. M1 Garand 3. Lee Enfield SMLE 2. M-16 1. AK-47 The Mosin Nagant didn't make the top 10. What additions or changes would you make to the list? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 161
|
I don't understand the wide gap between the Garand and the M-14? They are basicly the same gun with the M-14 going to a 20 round box magazine instead of the 8 round en block. The Steyr Aug wouldn't even make my list. Where was it ever combat proven? And against what other rifle? Bill T.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
Surprised me not to see the... BAR The G3 or CETME SKS Galil UZI (which I guess would be Classed as an SMG) The STG 44 was not produced in very large Quantities Comparatively and the Steyr Aug is a Late Production gun.
__________________ You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member ![]() |
the BAR was the first SAW so I understand why it didnt make the list also. but combat rifles..... G3,M16,AK,M1,M14,1903,98K,Enfield,FG42,FN/FAL If I remember correctly the Galil had major jamming issues just wasnt very reliable in the sandbox
__________________ "Speak softly but carry a big stick" -Teddy Roosevelt |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Moderator ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Selma, NC
Posts: 2,223
| Quote:
I also questioned the Sturmgewehr 44 over the Mosin. Last edited by troylaplante; 02-16-2007 at 02:22 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 182
|
The STG 44, though made in small quantities, was basically the grandfather of all assault rifles. You need to look at their criteria for inclusion on the show. However, the one I truly question is the Springfield 1903. It is a nice rifle but it is essentially a Mauser clone. I really don't get that one. The Mosin was mentioned as just not making the cut. However, based on their criteria Innovation, Length of Service, Reliability, Accuracy, and Handling, the Mosin really wasn't very innovating. The Mosin is in fact a good rifle for that reason. No frills, it just works when you need it to work.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Englewood, CO
Posts: 2,382
|
Whatever happened to the Thompson? It helped our troops greatly in WWII.
__________________ "Minimum wage, minimum effort." "Never underestimate the power of stupidity." ~Me |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 182
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Moderator ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Selma, NC
Posts: 2,223
|
The show covered the fact that the Springfield was a Mauser type rifle. They did hit the history about the war in Cuba and how the Mausers whacked many US soldiers. That led to the development of the Springfield, which was pretty effective in WW1. It also was used for sniper rifles right up through Korea, according to the show. It got high marks on accuracy, effectiveness, long use, and handling for its time. Yeah, I did. I am the one who wrote the original post and the one who watched the show, remember? Last edited by troylaplante; 02-16-2007 at 05:03 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,530
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,903
|
I would put the SKS up there. I'm not sure how much action is saw in a major war (I think it came around a tad too late), but if it had come earlier, the results would have been incredible. Today, lots of small military groups in the middle east and africa and south america...all over the world, use this rifle. It's proven the test of time, and the test of many battles. It's also one of the few battle rifles that I've show |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN. "The city where nothing happens."
Posts: 1,089
Blog Entries: 6 |
__________________ "All rifles need a sharp pointy object on the end!" http://s96.photobucket.com/albums/l195/zephri/ |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Moderator ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Selma, NC
Posts: 2,223
|
Apparently they thought the Mosin fell shorter on the grading criteria than the others. They did have a quick blurb on how the Mosin and one other rifle did not make the top 10 but were high on the list. Just a few minutes ago, I found a forum on The Military Channel's site where some others were discussing the same thing. Top Ten Combat Rifles - Topic Powered by eve community |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Indianapolis, IN. "The city where nothing happens."
Posts: 1,089
Blog Entries: 6 |
For some reason the people on that forum post sound very angry to me and they give all the other rifles too little credit...
__________________ "All rifles need a sharp pointy object on the end!" http://s96.photobucket.com/albums/l195/zephri/ |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 258
|
1903 & 03A3 Springfields M1 Garand M-14 SMLE Mosin Nagant Mausers Enfields Henry Springfield Rifle single shots Sharps These are all full sized battle rifles and no submachine guns or full autos make the list. The M-16 doesn't belong in this discussion |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member ![]() |
so you put the M-14 in there that doesnt make sense when the M-14 can go full auto and thus a heavier assault rifle based on the Garand design.
__________________ "Speak softly but carry a big stick" -Teddy Roosevelt |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 182
| No was in reference to Mooseman's comment. I was merely trying to put the idea that within the realms of what they setup it fell in there.
Last edited by couchtr26; 02-20-2007 at 11:21 PM. Reason: Dumb spelling |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Woodville tx. Vienna Il.
Posts: 75
|
The m14 was designed and fielded to some extent in select fire configuration
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: ohio
Posts: 48
|
What about the trusty M1 30CAL. Carbine? There were millions in use. The M14 was issued both ways.Auto with a bipod,you could go semi.And it was issued semi only,with no bipod. Last edited by charmincarmens; 02-21-2007 at 08:20 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 396
|
The M14 is currently issued as a semi-auto DMR and SASS, however some units (SEALs) have a functional selector switch.
|
| | |