Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > General Firearms > General Rifle

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-20-2007, 12:36 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 591
Blog Entries: 2
I have looked in the local gun dealers, and local gun dealer catoluages and cannot find many 6.5X55 rifles. Was wondering how good the 260 remington was in comparison. I thought that the 6.5X55 having the slightly larger case may have an advantage for reloding. Ballistics listed for the 6.5X55 are not that accurate because they must factory load the cartridge so the ammo can be fired in military surplus rifles. The few 6.5X55 rifles that i did find were Ruger, and Tikka.
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2007, 10:27 AM   #22
Super Moderator
 
BattleRifleG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 11,401
Images: 13
260 Remington is an excellent and more or less comparable choice IF you find a rifle for it that you like. Unfortunately, Remington dropped the ball by offering the 260 in the fringe of rifles instead of their core.

I have a Howa incoming in 6.5x55 Swede and have great expectations for it.
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
BattleRifleG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2007, 10:47 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 171
I recently got a 6.5 in a CZ 550 very nice rifle able to make five shot groups at 100yrds under the size of a quarter. using 140gr bullets and 4064imr powder.
okami515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2007, 09:29 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 591
Blog Entries: 2
Nice
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.


[Output: 51.67 Kb. compressed to 49.10 Kb. by saving 2.56 Kb. (4.96%)]