| | #22 |
| Registered User | Between the 222, 22-250 and 204, I would definitely do with the 22-250. Haven't had experience with the 204 but I've shot the 222 and 22-250. 22-250 can reach out a bit further. Not sold at all on any of them for deer though. Step up to a 243! Great for varmints too. |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
Barrel-Burners | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
Only spec is centerfire? does this mean people could hunt with centerfire 17s? that seems a bit crazy to me. I just knew at least 22 centerfires are legal b/c i know people that have used them there. Last edited by sell33; 03-22-2008 at 01:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Banned | Here is a good article on the 243. It is essentially a .308 case and 6mm bore. That is a much better bore size for the case than the .308. Even the benchrest target guys like it. And they like very few of the standard cartridges. .243 Win + .243 AI Cartridge Guide Ron |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Senior Member ![]() | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Member | Quote:
I have shot out a couple of 22-250's and one .223. I didn't keep track of how many rounds it took but I'm guessing maybe 3000 for the 22-250 and probably twice as many for the .223. A local gunsmith shortened the chamber end of the barrel on my .223 and re-chambered it for a $100. It's as good as new. | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Senior Member | Sam you are going to have to explain to me how a 1-14 twist will make a bullet gain rpm by going faster, i guess i'm stupid but 1-14 is 1-14 no matter how fast it goes. It only gets to make (1) revolution in every 14 inches it travels . Just my opinion. steve
__________________ For those who never fought for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Senior Member ![]() | It,s the distance per minute or feet per second.If a bullet is traveling at 3000fps and another is doing 4000fps then the slower one is only turning 3/4th,s of the revolutions per minute because it is only traveling 3/4th,s as far in the same time period. sam. |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Senior Member ![]() | I hunted Mule Deer from the ages of 12 - 15 with a 222! I never lost a deer, and I never had to shoot twice! I would wholeheartedley recommend it for someone who is going to use it most for varmint! Sam's lesson on barrel life is spot on! Come on now!
__________________ Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers Last edited by SwedeSteve; 03-23-2008 at 01:24 AM. |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Senior Member | What kinds of loads did you use steve? headshots maybe also? sounds like you may have been a bit undergunned but i have heard of people using 22-250 and 204 on mulies so obviously it can be done....just wouldn't be my first cartridge choice for mule deer |
| | |
| | #34 | |
| Registered User | Quote:
Surplus .223 Not Last edited by zukman; 04-01-2008 at 04:22 PM. | |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Senior Member | a 223 is somewhat comparable and a whole lot cheaper to shoot. and ammo is easier to find. i plan on buying a NEF ultra varmint in 223 sometime soon. a 22-250 is more versatile but more expensive too. a i dont think a 204 should be considered for deer at all unless you can put it right between its eyes. just my opinion. |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Senior Member | Well, i know this is a little old but thanks for all the info guys, my brother in law ended up getting a 22-250. He got a stevens 200 on sale, hasn't shot it yet and is now looking for a scope....any suggestions on a scope? I know he will not spend more than say 200....that would be pushing it too. Thanks |
| | |
| | #38 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
As for the actual question i would say 243. Has a good selection of bullets and is about the right amount of gun for most deer out to modest ranges. Varmints will fall to it no prob. The 25-06 is probobly getting a little much to be shooting repetitively. | |
| | |
| | #39 | ||
| Senior Member ![]() | Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by samuel; 04-30-2008 at 07:29 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost | ||
| | |