| | #21 | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #22 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't think the .357 Sig was around back when Jesse went to Glock Armorer's School :guitar: :gangster:
|
| |
| | #23 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well he could ammend his post and meke ole Lenny feel better |
| |
| | #24 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| or he might not so you don't too :insane: J/K I don't think Jesse comes by on Sundays :guitar: :gangster:
|
| |
| | #25 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 9
|
The reason lead is not recomended for Glocks is because it tends to stick on the rifling. I have shot small amounts(50 rounds) through my Glock 17 with no problems but it does take some work to get the barrel clean afterwards. THe lead leaves string-like deposits on the sides of the ridges.
|
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Buckeye Arizona
Posts: 156
| Quote:
Yes, size, or more concisely, ergonomics, was the deciding factor!! I have smallish hands. Most full size guns are to big for me!! For example, there is not a modern CZ pistol made that I can reach the trigger!! In the spirit of full discloser, I do have a G30 and a G29. They are built on the same frame. However, my prefered pistol to carry is either the G36 or the G26. The 30 and 29 feel "fat" when I grip them. Again, subjective ergonomics!!
__________________ I traded my manners for a handgun!!!!! :assult: | |
| | |