| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: oregon
Posts: 398
| progressive rifle twist Anyone heard of a progressive rifling twist. I heard of this for the first time at the range on Sunday. From what I understand, the twist starts out at a slow twist, then increases as the bullet moves down the barrel. So maybe it starts out at a 1 in 20 and slowly increase to a 1 in 8. Anyway I have never heard of such a thing but didn't want to call the guy on it before checking around. Thought I might run it around here for awhile and see what happens. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Resident Armed Liberal ![]() | It exists, or at least did in older guns. It's also called, "gain-twist." In military weapons, I believe they decided it wasn't worth the extra cost and trouble.
__________________ If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. -Anatole France Last edited by troy2000; 01-21-2008 at 01:46 PM. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Registered User Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 14
| You pretty much got it. It was used on a few rifles in the past, cant remember which ones off the top of my head, but it never really caught on, not sure why though. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,475
| Yes, it is true Yes, it was also called gain twist rifling by some people. It was a logical thing to try. However, it did not seem to produce any increase in accuracy, bullet velocity, etc. and therefore did not continue in the marketplace. You will probably find someone, somewhere that swears by this method but facts are facts and it just did not work out as something worthwhile. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| spiritual counselor ![]() ![]() | ive read about that in old army revolvers. 91- Mannlicher- carcano's had it for awhile
__________________ Last edited by billy; 01-21-2008 at 06:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: mn
Posts: 4,806
| gain twist is still used in some military weapons, and also available in aftermarket 1911 barrels. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,522
| It actually makes a lot of sense for someone like me that's interested in loading up some sub-sonic 7.62x39 rounds with 200-240gr bullets. You'd really need that progressive twist rate to get the proper spin so that it would stabilize.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Resident Armed Liberal ![]() | Earlier today, I was reading comments by a custom barrel-maker. unfortunately I can't find them again, and I didn't get his name. He said he used to do the progressive rifling. but years of careful testing finally convinced him that he could get better accuracy by concentrating on making his rifling as close to perfectly even from end to end as possible, instead.
__________________ If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. -Anatole France |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Iowa
Posts: 133
| Smith & Wesson uses gain twist in the 500 and 460. It's to keep the bullet from skidding on the rifling. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,522
| Well, I'm thinking around 21-24", since that's where the AES-10 and SKS sit for barrel length. I can't wait to start handloading so that I can put some together to try in my AES-10, though I'm thinking that the fact that it will be so little gas from to get it sub-sonic that the bolt won't cycle in the semi-auto. That's not a problem in an SKS, though, if you turn off the gas port.
__________________ |
| | |