Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Other Forums > Gunsmithing and Fabricating

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2008, 01:40 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 398
progressive rifle twist

Anyone heard of a progressive rifling twist. I heard of this for the first time at the range on Sunday. From what I understand, the twist starts out at a slow twist, then increases as the bullet moves down the barrel. So maybe it starts out at a 1 in 20 and slowly increase to a 1 in 8. Anyway I have never heard of such a thing but didn't want to call the guy on it before checking around. Thought I might run it around here for awhile and see what happens.
rdale501 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 01:43 PM   #2
Resident Armed Liberal
 
troy2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 9,459
Images: 9
It exists, or at least did in older guns. It's also called, "gain-twist." In military weapons, I believe they decided it wasn't worth the extra cost and trouble.
__________________
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. -Anatole France

Last edited by troy2000; 01-21-2008 at 01:46 PM.
troy2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 01:44 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Nelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 14
You pretty much got it. It was used on a few rifles in the past, cant remember which ones off the top of my head, but it never really caught on, not sure why though.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 02:48 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,475
Yes, it is true

Yes, it was also called gain twist rifling by some people. It was a logical thing to try. However, it did not seem to produce any increase in accuracy, bullet velocity, etc. and therefore did not continue in the marketplace. You will probably find someone, somewhere that swears by this method but facts are facts and it just did not work out as something worthwhile.
nathangdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 05:44 PM   #5
Thor's Hammer
 
SwedeSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 10,372
Images: 1
News to me! Thanks for the info guys...
__________________
Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers
SwedeSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 05:49 PM   #6
spiritual counselor
 
billy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: a secret lab on the shores of lake titicaca
Posts: 12,157
Images: 9
Blog Entries: 146
ive read about that in old army revolvers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson View Post
You pretty much got it. It was used on a few rifles in the past, cant remember which ones off the top of my head, but it never really caught on, not sure why though.
91- Mannlicher- carcano's had it for awhile
__________________

Last edited by billy; 01-21-2008 at 06:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 06:55 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
lefty o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mn
Posts: 4,806
gain twist is still used in some military weapons, and also available in aftermarket 1911 barrels.
lefty o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 08:45 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
just_a_car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,522
It actually makes a lot of sense for someone like me that's interested in loading up some sub-sonic 7.62x39 rounds with 200-240gr bullets. You'd really need that progressive twist rate to get the proper spin so that it would stabilize.
__________________
just_a_car is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 09:33 PM   #9
Resident Armed Liberal
 
troy2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 9,459
Images: 9
Earlier today, I was reading comments by a custom barrel-maker. unfortunately I can't find them again, and I didn't get his name.

He said he used to do the progressive rifling. but years of careful testing finally convinced him that he could get better accuracy by concentrating on making his rifling as close to perfectly even from end to end as possible, instead.
__________________
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. -Anatole France
troy2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 01:25 AM   #10
Thor's Hammer
 
SwedeSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 10,372
Images: 1
JAC & T2k- Points well taken. T2k- What about subsonic? Any specific barrel length JAC?
__________________
Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers
SwedeSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 02:40 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 133
Smith & Wesson uses gain twist in the 500 and 460. It's to keep the bullet from skidding on the rifling.
dogman2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 05:01 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
just_a_car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,522
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwedeSteve View Post
JAC & T2k- Points well taken. T2k- What about subsonic? Any specific barrel length JAC?
Well, I'm thinking around 21-24", since that's where the AES-10 and SKS sit for barrel length. I can't wait to start handloading so that I can put some together to try in my AES-10, though I'm thinking that the fact that it will be so little gas from to get it sub-sonic that the bolt won't cycle in the semi-auto. That's not a problem in an SKS, though, if you turn off the gas port.
__________________
just_a_car is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.


[Output: 78.47 Kb. compressed to 72.73 Kb. by saving 5.74 Kb. (7.31%)]