| | #1 |
| spiritual counselor ![]() ![]() | mil. brass vs. comm. brass
i am going to try some commercial brass and see if it is easier to work compared to military brass. i have a bunch of different kinds of brass. and it seems like this mil. stuff is pretty hard to size. any thoughts? it's all .308
__________________ Last edited by billy; 01-10-2008 at 10:15 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Thor's Hammer ![]() |
I think you are probably right. I used to reload US Mil 7.62 Nato a lot, and the commercial stuff seemed easier. Maybe the Mil stuff needed annealing. At FT Benning we went through beau coup ammo on the M60 ranges. They used to have lots marked as throwaway, ie. the brass I mean.
__________________ Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers Last edited by SwedeSteve; 01-10-2008 at 10:26 PM. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Iowa
Posts: 133
|
Military brass is thicker and has less case capacity than commercial.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,087
|
The commercial brass has much better anealing plus the military is heavier.I just dont mess with molitary brass any more. sam.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Super Moderator ![]() |
A lot depends on how worn the chamber was on the gun that fired that ammo and how swelled the brass is...New Brass is way easier to work! Rich
__________________ You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM! |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| spiritual counselor ![]() ![]() | Quote:
saving money by buying unworkable brass wasnt very cost effective!
__________________ Last edited by billy; 01-11-2008 at 06:58 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: NW Montana
Posts: 61
|
What caliber is it? Might have been fired in a mg. Like the wife says, "use lots of lube" |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: mn
Posts: 4,812
|
308, and -06 mil brass is thicker. .223 brass is pretty equivalent mil vs commercial. if it was fired in a machinegun, it will be harder to size due to the slightly larger chamber dimensions most MG's have.
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,087
|
Sure sounds like M60 to me.Remember the little bulge above the base?For econimy I have found new brass was the real bargain.I havnt bought in a while and suppose it is rough to get a bargain.Using lots of lube and cleaning the die often works fairly good. sam.
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Ohio
Posts: 54
|
Never used any 7.62x51 MIL Brass. It probably did come from an M60. Any scratches on it from the links? I do use .223 military brass, haven't had any problems with it but man I hate reaming the crimp out of the primer pockets |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Senior Member ![]() | Quote:
MidwayUSA - RCBS Primer Pocket Swager Combo
__________________ I'm a down home back woods redneck | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,087
|
Except for tumbling I treat them the same as once fired,trimming,resizing & champforing. sam.
|
| | |