in its day, the .30C was pretty good, but

12-06-2003, 10:12 AM

the CAR-15 223 has had it beaten all to hell, in every way, for well over 30years, now. Wake up and smell the coffee.

PAPA G · 12-06-2003, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by over
the CAR-15 223 has had it beaten all to hell, in every way, for well over 30years, now. Wake up and smell the coffee.

the comic book commando strikes again!!!

NRAJOE · 12-06-2003, 10:51 AM

Yeah, whats your point dude?

12-06-2003, 11:32 AM

just an idiot.

12-06-2003, 12:20 PM

the M-1 Carbine is popular among collectors...over isn't popular at all

PAPA G · 12-06-2003, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by over
just saving some newby the expense and hassle of buying the wrong gun, when what he wants is PERFORMANCE. Unlike you guys, who only care about bs. you dont like it, cause you have a bunch of clunkers you'd like to sell to the unaware.

who wants a stinky .30 carbine, or a super sucky .223 armalite variant. GO GET A MA DEUCE AND REALLY ROCK THE NEIGHBORHOOD!!!

12-06-2003, 05:22 PM

cause u aint got it IN ya to go anywhere else.

12-06-2003, 05:24 PM

I should know because I was 600 yards away when they were shooting at me!

SPOCAHP ANAR · 12-06-2003, 06:17 PM

Hey over;

Are you aware that olivine and hyperstene are the only orthorhombic pyroxenes?

Just some more useless info that doesn't belong in this thread.

PAPA G · 12-06-2003, 07:11 PM

so it takes a match ready HBAR to beat a warbaby?

Roy Collins · 12-06-2003, 08:37 PM

First of all you can't compare a Car15 to a m1 carbine. One is a rifle round and the other is a pistol round. For what is was designed for the Carbine does it very well. The Car has its advantages too but come on, Its like saying the Pontiac Fiero Gt is faster than a 57 chevy on the highway. I am sure it is but which one would you rather have?

jimb2 · 12-06-2003, 08:41 PM

I guess some people just don't appreciate history. Besides, if he wants to compare then he needs to look at the 5.7 johnson which would be a more realistic comparison. For its time and purpose, the carbine was as good as it got. Besides, he's trying to compare a "battle rifle" to a "sidearm". It is roughly the same as the carbine and the M1 Garand. Of course it isn't the same! It was never meant to be!

lefty o · 12-07-2003, 12:49 AM

do you really not have a life to keep coming back under a different name spouting the same o same o over and over again. and as far as your 223 is better than anything else- the 223 is not a great performer on dropping living things in their tracks - get over it!!!!!!!!!!!

12-08-2003, 11:46 AM

I love the M1 Carbine!

12-06-2003, 10:12 AM	#1
over Guest Posts: n/a	in its day, the .30C was pretty good, but the CAR-15 223 has had it beaten all to hell, in every way, for well over 30years, now. Wake up and smell the coffee.

12-06-2003, 10:51 AM	#3
NRAJOE Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Toledo,OH Posts: 19,043 Images: 3	Yeah, whats your point dude? __________________ U.S. Army 1976-1979 237th Combat Engineers Heilbronn, Germany

12-06-2003, 11:32 AM	#4
over Guest Posts: n/a	what's the matter? I'm just an idiot.

12-06-2003, 05:22 PM	#7
over Guest Posts: n/a	yeah, gang-punks like u think of 'hood, cause u aint got it IN ya to go anywhere else.

12-06-2003, 05:24 PM	#8
over Guest Posts: n/a	AR 223 has OWNED 600 line at matches I should know because I was 600 yards away when they were shooting at me!

12-06-2003, 12:20 PM	#5
Logansdad Guest Posts: n/a	the M-1 Carbine is popular among collectors...over isn't popular at all

12-06-2003, 06:17 PM	#9
SPOCAHP ANAR Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: SC-upstate Posts: 4,087 Images: 3 Blog Entries: 4	Hey over; Are you aware that olivine and hyperstene are the only orthorhombic pyroxenes? Just some more useless info that doesn't belong in this thread. __________________ Spocrest Out!..........

12-06-2003, 07:11 PM	#10
PAPA G Guest Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: somerset, kentucky Posts: 12	so it takes a match ready HBAR to beat a warbaby?

12-06-2003, 08:37 PM	#11
Roy Collins Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Louisville Kentucky. Posts: 316	First of all you can't compare a Car15 to a m1 carbine. One is a rifle round and the other is a pistol round. For what is was designed for the Carbine does it very well. The Car has its advantages too but come on, Its like saying the Pontiac Fiero Gt is faster than a 57 chevy on the highway. I am sure it is but which one would you rather have?

12-06-2003, 08:41 PM	#12
jimb2 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Ohio Posts: 511	I guess some people just don't appreciate history. Besides, if he wants to compare then he needs to look at the 5.7 johnson which would be a more realistic comparison. For its time and purpose, the carbine was as good as it got. Besides, he's trying to compare a "battle rifle" to a "sidearm". It is roughly the same as the carbine and the M1 Garand. Of course it isn't the same! It was never meant to be! __________________ I am a nobody. Nobody is perfect. Therefore, I am perfect...

12-07-2003, 12:49 AM	#13
lefty o Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: mn Posts: 4,785	do you really not have a life to keep coming back under a different name spouting the same o same o over and over again. and as far as your 223 is better than anything else- the 223 is not a great performer on dropping living things in their tracks - get over it!!!!!!!!!!!

12-08-2003, 11:46 AM	#14
over Guest Posts: n/a	I love the M1 Carbine!