| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North East
Posts: 12
| Found this site while browsing for information on the Carbine I just picked up. There seems to be loads of good info and discussion. This is what I have without disassembly: receiver: IBM Corp - 3675 Adj. rear sight stamped I.R. CO on right side, no other numbers Barrel stamped IBM Corp - 9 -43, there is also a flamming bomb stamped below the IBM stamp. Front sight has a P stamped near the back edge of the sight. Small barrel band w/ small sling loop, AI stamped on right side of band. Stock is stamped with a 2 in the sling cut out, also see a circle with what appears to be a backwards k or an h stamped inside the circle. The stock also has an N stamped on the bottom of the pistol grip and has a stamped steel butt plate. The mag release has an M stamped on it with a smaller AD above. There is an N stamped on the bottom of the trigger guard near the back. The safety has an N stamped on it. Any information anyone could pass along will be appreciated as I have just begun to research. Thanks, Dandy Dan Last edited by Dandy Dan; 03-16-2008 at 01:17 AM. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Kentucky
Posts: 107
| There's a lot of folks here who know details, but that sounds like a nice early IBM. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Pottersville, MO
Posts: 571
| Dan, Check out the CMP site. Go to Sales--Carbine and there are several articles available. One has information on markings. All of the articles will provide some good knowledge. Civilian Marksmanship Program |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vermont USA
Posts: 39
| Your carbine was made in September of 43 which matches the barrel date. That's the best news. Sounds like you have a type 1 or 2 NPM trigger housing but pics are needed for a precise ID. Double check the safety, are you sure it doesn't say IN which would also be NPM. Is the barrel band type 1 or type 2? If it's a type 1 band then marked AI is more than likely a type 3 band that has been cut down to look like a type 1. IRCO sight is a type 3 stamped made by International Register. MrJ Home www.m1carbineforum.com |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 482
| Jits, an N marked safety is more likely a lever type rotary than a push button. Stock is an M2 possibly made by OKay industries, but the jury is still out on that. Front sight is an Inland. And the N on the pistol grip butt is an inspection mark.
__________________ I am a nobody. Nobody is perfect. Therefore, I am perfect... |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vermont USA
Posts: 39
| Quote:
MrJ Home | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 4,292
| Just popped in to say hello and to welcome you to G&G DandyDan. Congrats on your new M1.
__________________ I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6! |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North East
Posts: 12
| Thanks for the info ref. the CMP site. I will take a look there and continue my research Jimb, You are right , the safety is a lever type rotary, thanks for the info. I guess from the info. gathered thus far, this is what you call a mixmaster??? The barrel band is a type 3 with no modifications. I will post photos as soon as I figure out how. Thanks for the info. I am becoming more and more interested. Last edited by Dandy Dan; 03-16-2008 at 10:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 482
| Rather than call it a mixmaster, I prefer to call them arsenal rebuilds. And yes, it is.
__________________ I am a nobody. Nobody is perfect. Therefore, I am perfect... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North East
Posts: 12
| I picked up some UMC ammo and ran a couple clips through it. No problems other than I'll have to sight it in better. I really like the way it shoots. I will now strip and clean it and record the part numbers that I can locate. Does any one have any thoughts on my trying to rebuild the carbine with the parts that IBM would have used when it was made? |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vermont USA
Posts: 39
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Ohio
Posts: 457
| Will be costly and wont be a original rifle, just a put together. You have to decide for yourself if its worth it. Your rifle has history as is being a arsenal rebuild. Once you start swapping parts you take that history away . Just my opinion |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North East
Posts: 12
| Unable to post photos I have been trying to copy photos of my carbine into this reply and cannot figure out how to do this. Does anyone have any suggestions, I usually learn quickly. Dandy Dan ![]() |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Super Moderator ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Alaska Wilderness
Posts: 8,919
| From the Boss... Using the G&G Attachment method (easiest): 1. Be sure you are logged into gunandgame.com. If you need to, register! 2. Instead of using the quick reply feature, press the advance button. 3. Near the bottom of the new page t hat is loaded is an option that says "Attachments". Click on it 4. A new box will pop up, click browse. 5. Locate the image you want to upload. click ok. 6. Click upload. 7. Repeat step 5 again as needed. 8. Click done. 9. The box should close, and you can press post reply. 10. Done Rich
__________________ You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM! |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North East
Posts: 12
| Thanks Mooseman684 Thanks, I have been trying to post photos for over a week. I'll try again tomorrow, my wife is calling now. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North East
Posts: 12
| IBM photos I think I've got it!!! These photos are not very good but I'm learning. Hopefully you can tell what I have from these, or maybe someone could suggest additional. |
| | |