| | |||||||
| Notices |
| View Poll Results: 308 a better choice for the M1 nowadays? | |||
| It's HERESY to have an M1 Garand in anything but the original 30-06 | | 5 | 35.71% |
| An otherwise standard M1 Garand in 308 would be more practical for the modern shooter | | 4 | 28.57% |
| You missed the real reasons people get 308 Garands. | | 4 | 28.57% |
| I am a weenie and don't like the M1 Garand, or the 30-06 round. | | 1 | 7.14% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | 308 Garand - More practical? Wondering if I've been wrong that it's heresy and impractical to have an M1 Garand in 308 instead of 30-06. With military 30-06, I have to be careful of corrosive primers and non-standardization of loads between countries and of course worrying about using commercial ammo. 308 seems to be much more uniform in its surplus varieties, never corrosive, and cheaper to boot. One advantage I thought of for the 30-06 Garand was a semi-auto that can legally use AP ammo, but then I figured a bolt gun with a scope could probably make those shots more accurately. So the question is, for those of us simply wanting to shoot the M1 Garand for heritage and marksmanship, is the 308 chambering possibly a better choice?
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member ![]() | mabe you will get a response on your post. Iv'e pondered the same question. I'd like to have both. http://www.gunandgame.com/forums/308...and.26717.html
__________________ |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Super Moderator ![]() ![]() | A Garand M1 is not in my collection...yet...but when/if I ever get one it will need to be in original condition or I won't be interested. :nod:
__________________ "If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right". |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Moderator ![]() | It would depend on my reason for getting it. If I want a true historical collectible, it would be .30-06 - and I would shoot it sparingly. If I wanted a good shooter, I would go with the .308, for better ammo availability. I see it as no worse than having a Colt 1911A1 in a non-.45ACP caliber. Sure, it ain't original, but that doesn't make it a bad gun!
__________________ Moderator of: AR15/M16, M14/M1A, New/Beginning Shooters and Militaria/Collectables. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | Indeed, one kept for collectibility and preservation should be 30-06. A 308 would only be for a shooter. Question here is if even that justifies it, which I think it does.
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Moderator ![]() | Yep key reason is cost and availability. CMP has many times run out of 30-06 and now sells goofy stuff in 30-06. The Lake City was the best and pretty much gone. 308 is everywhere as it was and still is a Nato round so it became common. Rick B
__________________ If I cant fix it,, It must REALLY be broken! |
| | |