Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Military Firearms > M1911 & Clone Pistols



Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2006, 12:58 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: nashville
Posts: 363
Blog Entries: 1
beavertail safetys

i have a colt 1991 compact.i love it but i would like to put on a beavertail grip safety.they all say 250 radius frame.what does that mean,are they hard to put on,and which are the best.
remchuck is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-14-2006, 07:35 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
jerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 13,768
Blog Entries: 1
Frames are typically cut differently to accept a beavertail. I'm a full size 1911 shooter so can't vouch for the compacts. Some companies offer a "drop in" where the frame does not need to be modified. Check Wilson.
jerry is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-14-2006, 07:40 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 14,126
I have the "drop in" beavertail safety in my full-size 1991A1. I tend to get a bad 'bite' from the regular 1911 tang, so the wider beavertail really helps. It still pounds me a bit, but I have learned to lower my grip so it isn't as bad.
The real beavertails needing the frame grinding are the best, but are more expensive, and you need to find a good smith. A bad smith could really ruin a frame.
My Star Super has no grip safety - the tang is fixed. That puppy has drawn blood during a shooting session! OUCH!
__________________
"A bold spirit embiggens the smallest man!"
Jebediah Springfield

Last edited by Big Dog; 10-16-2006 at 03:11 PM.
Big Dog is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-16-2006, 12:43 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 99
Here is how a good smith fits one on a LW lower end.





It came out nice after the Paint Job!
Dave Sample is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Military Firearms > M1911 & Clone Pistols

Tags
beavertail, safetys

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.


[Output: 40.82 Kb. compressed to 37.90 Kb. by saving 2.92 Kb. (7.17%)]