Like Tree5Likes
  • 1 Post By Tha Dave
  • 1 Post By oldjarhead
  • 3 Post By Big Dog

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-08-2012, 05:38 AM   #1
FALO Fanatic
 
hounddawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South of Nasty-vile, Tennessee
Posts: 2,367
New 91 -Swap receiver or not



Just bought this lady, all matching. I have another that has the crest intact, but the barrel is FUBAR. I'm thinking I might put the crested receiver on this one... but then the numbers won't match. Dilemma. Thoughts?
__________________
"It is a just person who disobeys an unjust law."
Plato (427-347 BC)
hounddawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 06:04 AM   #2
Firearm Zealot
 
Tha Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: All over
Posts: 2,567
I would keep them as they are, make the one with the bad barrel a wall hanger and that one your shooter.
Cyrano likes this.
__________________
Anything said here is my PERSONAL opinion nothing more

USMC SGT.
1371
0933
0931
Tha Dave is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 07:29 AM   #3
Firearm Zealot
 
oldjarhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 7,500
Blog Entries: 2
I'd say keep this one as it is and re-barrel the other one...why break up something that needs to be kept together.
PAPA G likes this.
__________________
If ya don't know where I've been and ya don't know where I'm going, your opinions of me don't count.
oldjarhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 10:37 AM   #4
Firearm Zealot
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Florida - the Gunshine State!
Posts: 18,846
Depends on if you want it as a shooter or a display piece. I prefer to shoot my rifles - I'd rebarrel the one with the bad bore. But that's just me. I don't get anal on 'collector value', as I don't generally sell my rifles.
__________________
If you actually passed third grade English, let it show!
Adult Literacy is your friend.
Big Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 11:08 AM   #5
FALO Fanatic
 
hounddawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South of Nasty-vile, Tennessee
Posts: 2,367
Nah, I like shooters. What I'd really like is to get aholt of a good 91 barrel. They are about as plentiful as chicken teeth, and the 1909 barrel doesn't fit. Large ring & small ring.

I guess I'll keep her as is for now, and maybe later rebarrel with a .308 barrel. It'll lose the sleek lines of the almost full stock though. Oh well...
__________________
"It is a just person who disobeys an unjust law."
Plato (427-347 BC)
hounddawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 12:04 PM   #6
Firearm Zealot
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somerset, Guntucky
Posts: 14,256
negative on the .308. the action is marginal for .308...you'll put yer eye out kid!!!
__________________
MOE! LARRY! THE CHEESE!
Life Member the Elmer Fudd Hunt Club
PAPA G is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2012, 06:45 PM   #7
Firearm Aficionado
 
Capt.Hotpants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 633
This is NOT a safe action for .308. It's even a bad Idea to shoot the common surplus 7.65 out of these old 91s as most of it was loaded hotter for the 1909. If you wanna do a .308 mauser I would find a 98 that bubba already played with. There are many more sportered pieces to work on than nice original pieces.

You gotta remember that smokeless powder was invented about 5 years before this rifle was designed and made, and there is NO WAY they new the full power of smokeless powder by that point in time.

I love my 1891, it sucks about the crest getting removed but it is part of history and if you change it up then it loses it's value. A non crested original rifle will go for more than a crested rifle that has been re-barreled regardless if it's an original Argentine barrel.

Whats really cool about these is you don't need an FFL license to send these around as most of them were made before 1898. My 1891 was made in 1894. There is a way to tell by the serial numbers what year it was made. There is a chart floating around online somewhere and that will tell you what year it was made and tell you if the government considers it an antique.

Last edited by Capt.Hotpants; 07-12-2012 at 06:51 PM.
Capt.Hotpants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 11:58 PM   #8
Firearm Enthusiast
 
JUNKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 329
I think diferent

Quote:       Originally Posted by Capt.Hotpants View Post
This is NOT a safe action for .308. It's even a bad Idea to shoot the common surplus 7.65 out of these old 91s as most of it was loaded hotter for the 1909. If you wanna do a .308 mauser I would find a 98 that bubba already played with. There are many more sportered pieces to work on than nice original pieces.

You gotta remember that smokeless powder was invented about 5 years before this rifle was designed and made, and there is NO WAY they new the full power of smokeless powder by that point in time.

I love my 1891, it sucks about the crest getting removed but it is part of history and if you change it up then it loses it's value. A non crested original rifle will go for more than a crested rifle that has been re-barreled regardless if it's an original Argentine barrel.

Whats really cool about these is you don't need an FFL license to send these around as most of them were made before 1898. My 1891 was made in 1894. There is a way to tell by the serial numbers what year it was made. There is a chart floating around online somewhere and that will tell you what year it was made and tell you if the government considers it an antique.
I think different
The Mauser action is very strong, can withstand the 308 perfectly ... I have seen that even Remington Rolling Block prepared to shoot that caliber ...
These weapons are very strong ...
but keep in mind that there are now few arms in original ...
and if you make big changes collectibles lose value
I've been building rifles with Mauser action of thousands of different sizes (they are very strong and work very well) ... but collector value "zero"
excuse my English
JUNKER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 04:24 AM   #9
Firearm Zealot
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Florida - the Gunshine State!
Posts: 18,846
If you handload, you can keep the pressure on the lighter side for the older small-ring actions - that's the way I roll for my 7.62X51 barreled Spanish M1916. There is data out there that shows the pressure for the loads, and the minimums are generally safe for the old actions.
I have data for the BL-C(2) powder that starts down in the 37,000 range of pressure - okay for my old warhorse......
__________________
If you actually passed third grade English, let it show!
Adult Literacy is your friend.
Big Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2012, 07:17 AM   #10
Firearm Zealot
 
mouser868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Turn around, I might be there
Posts: 2,435
Wonder how it would be in a 35 Remington??
mouser868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun and Game - Firearms Forums > Firearms > Military Firearms > Mausers

Tags
receiver, swap

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brass swap! Fred J. Wahl The Powder Keg 7 11-01-2009 07:44 PM
Brass swap-- Fred J. Wahl The Powder Keg 7 06-28-2009 09:39 AM
Receiver Damage from bolt? CMP Receiver. Ericc The Powder Keg 5 02-05-2008 06:35 AM
Mosin Swap! Spikestrip Mosin Nagant 12 11-30-2006 04:47 PM
357 to 44 swap swift5337 The Powder Keg 2 11-28-2006 01:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.




Recent Discussions

Proud Sponsors


NRA NETWORK



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West