Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Military Firearms > Mosin Nagant

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-10-2008, 05:58 PM   #1
Member
 
KentuckyBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 54
M44 vs. M38

For the next rifle in my arsenal, I'm going to invest either in an M44 or 38...my question is: does the attached bayonet on the M44 alter anything related to the rifle's ballistics, or are the two pretty much the same, other than the bayonet of course.
KentuckyBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 07:07 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
marion57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,883
You will get 5,000 different opinons on that one LOL...I have both and yes the bayo does change harmonics of the barrel >>It may be removed and re sited to shoot POA same as the m 38 I have both and can see no difference in the ability to hit the bullseye with either other than my ability to see the target
marion57 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 08:41 PM   #3
Thor's Hammer
 
SwedeSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 10,372
Images: 1
Marion is spot on as usual! There is no bayonet for a M38, so if you want one, go with the M44. Otherwise, they are pretty much the same rifle.
__________________
Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers
SwedeSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 08:45 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Choco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 199
Get a M44.
Choco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 09:01 PM   #5
Listen to yur Inner Hippo
 
texnmidwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South east Wisconsin
Posts: 3,454
Marion is as right as rain. If you are investing then you might want to look at the M38s. Right now there are a lot of m44s out there but fewer m38s. You can't go wrong with either. I have three m44s and an m38. If you decide on an M38 then look for one with an original m38 stock. Some of them are M38s with M44 stocks. Only difference is that the stock is relieved on the right side for the bayonet. As Marion said, both will shoot very well and be a lot of fun.
__________________
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati"
(If all else fails play dead)
texnmidwest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 09:07 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
squirrelbaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,269
here are a couple of things i think are diffrent between the two, first, i think the m38 is a little less common, second is price all the m38s ive seen including the one i own are a good $40-$50 more than all the m44 ive seen. third with a m38 you dont get wierd looks at the range becouse you have your bayo extended when shooting ( you can resight the m44 in without the bayo extended though) 4. your 91/30 wont think that his little brother is loved more becouse it gets to holds its toys all the time and the 91/30 doesnt. 5. m38s are just cooler! (becouse i said so!)
squirrelbaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2008, 09:13 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Geo M44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Desert
Posts: 2,210
M44's were as the name says made from late 1943 to 1948 and in other eastern block countries into the late 1950's. My first M44 was a Romanian 1953 which I sold for $70 (made $20 at the time).

M38's (~1938 to 44) were the first of the carbines and were mostly war issue. Don't quote me on the dates, but close enough.

I have found the post war M44 bores (1946-1948) to be generally excellent, as you might expect, and I have just ordered my first M38 (and a Finn M39), so no experience there. Most of the M38's that I have seen are counterbored but from what I've heard here on G&G they generally shoot well.

From a collectors point of view get the M38 first as they are starting to get hard to find. M44's are more readily available. For $170 or so you can get both.
Geo M44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


[Output: 60.97 Kb. compressed to 57.32 Kb. by saving 3.66 Kb. (6.00%)]