| | #1 |
| Senior Member | Well Folks; I found answers to questions that I didn't even have Want to learn about SPOTTING SCOPES Catadioptric or Mirror Scopes | Better View Desired Get back outta the way; Understandable and good
__________________ Craig By the standards of most |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 741
| That is a nice article, but it does not address a limitation of catadioptric telscopes that is very important to shooters, less so to birders: contrast. While a reflector and a refractor of the same aperture have theoretically identical resolving power, a quality refractor will show higher contrast. This is especially important when viewing bullet holes in the target black. I do not know why this is so, although I should. I think it has something to do with the correction for chromatic aberration necessary to raise the quality of the telescope out of the crummy K-Mart category. You can bet I'll ask my optical engineer friends soon. I have a very high quality astronomical Mak that makes a mediocre target scope for just this reason. I have not yet experimented with filters, but that is in the near future. Reducing the blue content of the light may help. Anyway, the service rifle teams use refractors.
__________________ Certified rifle and pistol instructor |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 741
| A friend who is an optical engineer shed some light (ha) on why my astro scope makes a poor target spotter. Astronomical scopes are designed to operate at low light levels. They do not have the same level of internal baffles to reduce light scattering as do target scopes which are designed to operate in brightly-lit conditions. The scattering reduces the astro scope's ability to deal with low contrast images at high light levels. I guess the lesson here is to save up for a good refractor target scope.
__________________ Certified rifle and pistol instructor |
| | |