| | #81 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Knoxville
Posts: 274
|
Its a pretty commonly disputed claim... I would think it safe to call the "ping" as the downfall- the urban legend.
__________________ "Love my country, fear my government..." |
| | |
| | #82 |
| STAIN'ALIVE,STAIN'ALIVE! ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: St Charles MO
Posts: 904
| The question is,
What is the M1 Garand? ( As in JEOPARDY)
__________________ AGENT ORANGE The last ghost of Vietnam ATF- Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, where are the chips? Last edited by ALR; 05-21-2009 at 11:40 PM. |
| | |
| | #83 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Intercoastal Sea Islands, SC, USA
Posts: 2,725
| Quote:
![]() ![]() The FG-42
| |
| | |
| | #84 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Intercoastal Sea Islands, SC, USA
Posts: 2,725
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #85 |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 33
|
Look everyone, we see these posts all the time: "Which in your opinion is the best_____of WW2". Now, we can sit here all day and debate these kinds of things, but what it comes down to is: most of the small arms and weapons used by the allies in WW2 were very good weapons and served for many years after, and some before, the war. But ultimately, what it comes down to is: we won.
|
| | |
| | #86 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Northeaster Lower Michigan
Posts: 486
|
#4 1936 MAS France was defeated almost at the beginning of the war but the rifle wasn't to blame. Accurate, nice handling, with sights as good as any but the Americans'. The main drawback with the rifle is it's lack of a mechanical safety. The mainspring is so strong that if you close the bolt but leave the handle up,turning it just enough to begin to engage (maybe 5 degrees) and pull the trigger, it will finish rotating the bolt for you. I haven't tried it with a live round, so I don't know if the fring pin comes down with enough force to fire. The only way to avoid this is to leave the handle totally un-engaged. The M-N does the same thing. tom |
| | |
| | #87 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
|
I would agree with the M1 Garand as the best.
|
| | |
| | #88 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
|
And SVT-40 best too westrifle.com |
| | |
| | #89 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Northcentral Ohio
Posts: 641
|
StG-44!! Intermediate rifle cartridge, low recoil, high capacity magazine, lighter than the Garand, rapid magazine change! The Garand is a great gun, but for war, I would rather have the StG-44. If you can read this, thank a teacher, if you are reading this in English, thank a soldier. Thanks guys
|
| | |
| | #91 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: NY
Posts: 147
|
M1 Garand
|
| | |
| | #92 | ||
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
Quote:
You have to remember he wasn't usually fighting pitched battles in the old-fashioned sense of the term, with massed firepower. I believe the typical situation he was thinking of would be his company in its foxholes trying to get some sleep...while the Japanese probed and poked the perimeter off and on all night long, making diversionary attacks on one side while their buddies on the other side were trying to cut the wire, trying to concentrate on the men in one or two foxholes at a time, trying to make an opening somewhere they could come pouring through.... I got the impression that a lot of the time the Americans owned the day, and the Japanese owned the night. Last edited by troy2000; 06-18-2009 at 03:39 AM. | ||
| | |
| | #93 |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31
|
In the recent book "Sniper" the use of the M1C and M1D as modified for sniper use is discussed, and the ping and the flying clip are both discussed as giving away your location, apparently ears are better at locating the high-pitched ping than the explosion. The Marine snipers preferred the special Springfield M1903A4 or Winchester model 70s because the flying brass is also a giveaway, Also because scopes are not readily mounted on the M1. Snipers are very sneaky.
|
| | |