| | |||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | Projects | Blogs | FAQ | FlashChat | Members List | Arcade | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Tags: caliber, carbines, hunting, pistol |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4
| hunting with pistol caliber carbines What say ye. 9mm carbine able to kill white tail deer reliably. At what range with what loads? How about .40s&w carbine? At what range and what loads? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: mn
Posts: 4,245
| at relatively close range , they will work. many states have minimun caliber requirements though. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: BACKWOODS PA
Posts: 168
| Always wanted to get a .45 LC lever gun...maybe some day when I'm rich A 9mm is kinda small for white tail, you would be better off with the .40. You also might wanna think about a .357 mag, .44 mag, or a .45 LC. All of which come in carbines, and will pass minimum requirements in most states.
__________________ ALL FEAR THE SENTINAL |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,020
| Concerning pistol cartridges in carbines for hunting, I would consider 357 Mag the minimum with 44 Mag much more reliable.
__________________ "Some people can not live without wilderness"-Aldo Leopold |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,020
| Concerning pistol cartridges in carbines for hunting, I would consider 357 Mag the minimum with 44 Mag much more reliable. Forget rimless cartridges they don't have it to kill game quickly.
__________________ "Some people can not live without wilderness"-Aldo Leopold |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4
| I'll admit I'm a little confused comparing the 9mm and the .40s&w. This article states that the best rounds for the 9mm are just as good as the best rounds for the .40 s&w. It has the following examples: Code: Here are some samples of performance in bare gelatin: Round Penetration Expansion Wound Area Federal HydraShok 9mm 124gr +P+ 13.3" 0.67" 44.8 sq. in. .40S&W 155gr 13.3" 0.68" 47.9 sq. in. .45ACP 185gr +p 12.9" 0.69" 31.5 sq. in. .45ACP 230gr 13.7" 0.71" 28.4 sq. in. Federal PDA 9mm 135gr 11.5" 0.72" .40S&W 135gr 9.6" 0.68" .45ACP 165gr 11.3" 0.78" Remington Golden Saber 9mm 147gr 12.8" 0.68" .40S&W 165gr 12.5" 0.67" .45ACP 230gr 14.1" 0.76" I ask because I'm planning on getting a carbine and am waivering between the 9mm version and .40s&w version. Would I really use for deer hunting? I doubt it but it would be nice to have the option. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | 40 would no doubt be better for hunting than 9mm. Whether it would be good at all is another matter. Consider Ruger's 44 Magnum carbine if you want a semi-auto. Or a levergun. Or a far better choice for a short range semi-auto hunting rifle would be the venerable SKS. Ammo is significantly cheaper, rifle is less than half the cost. For the same or better price ammowise and gunwise as a 40 S&W carbine, you could buy a CETME or Saiga in 308 (Saigas also come in milder calibers), good for all ranges of hunting deer sized game.
__________________ Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf Last edited by BattleRifleG3; 01-18-2005 at 11:33 PM. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Tampa
Posts: 6,431
| I wouldn't hunt deer with either 9mm nor .40S&W as I am concerned with clean kills as possible,to me both are defense weapons. In pistol caliber carbines the .44 mag is the minimum for humane hunting.
__________________ Don't worry,be happy! 01-20-08 |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | I agree Rave a responsible hunter is always looking for a clean single shot kill and that means using a caliber to handle the job -- common handgun calibers are defensive and not for hunting
__________________ "Homeland Security is the responsibility of an armed citizen" ME http://webpages.charter.net/s.s.v/ |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: socal
Posts: 1,833
| I believe some states don't allow even a 357 for deer... |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | Tommy I am sure the 44 S&W has many kills to its name like the 22 LR. But for humane kills I want a round that doesn't require a shot in the eye or ear
__________________ "Homeland Security is the responsibility of an armed citizen" ME http://webpages.charter.net/s.s.v/ |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member | what about a .44s&w in a rifle wouldn't that give it more velocity? just asking.not that i would hunt with the round but i was just woundering how much a rifle would change the velocity of the bullet or would change it at all??? |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Super Moderator ![]() | if its a pistol cartridge in a rifle you could be talking about a velocity reduction
__________________ "Homeland Security is the responsibility of an armed citizen" ME http://webpages.charter.net/s.s.v/ |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: WAITSFIELD VERMONT
Posts: 1,562
| Got two M1 carbine conversions in 45 Win Mag and 50AE DANA |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 9
| Quote:
S.C. has a minimum energy requirement, add in the 230 fps you can get from a hot hand load in the carbine's 16 inch barrel and you get real close to 357 mag's rating of 500 ft lbs with a 115gr jacketed HP 9mm. Remember you wanna go with a slower burning powder to get the extra M/V from a carbine. Limit your shot's to 50 yds or less and you have one dead deer Ron Last edited by RonfrmSC; 01-27-2005 at 12:00 AM. | |
| | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| | |