[TheLastMountain]

Why don't they run the same test on a CCW holder and not tell them its a test. They act like CCW holders ain't gonna hit anything anyways.

[Martin Rage]

If this study was true you would see tons of news stories about CCW holders being killed and their guns stolen. Funny, I can't think of the last time this was reported...and you know the liberal news would go berserk over that opportunity. Instead you hear the opposite all the time.

[ChaZam]

Actually, this makes me more certain that I won't allow ABC to dress me, or train me, or use me as a prop to further their socialistic agenda.. Thanks ABC!!!!!!!!!!

[SightNSqueeze]

Quote:       Originally Posted by ChaZam

Actually, this makes me more certain that I won't allow ABC to dress me, or train me, or use me as a prop to further their socialistic agenda.. Thanks ABC!!!!!!!!!!

Agreed, but sad to say, ABC paid these people handsomly for their trouble. There was nothing real or scientific about it. I imagine the kids were innocent and sincere becase they were asked baited questions and "dressed to fail" by their ABC handlers. I will however place fault with the police instructors who played along with ABC ... more for the loot that was offered than to serve as "givers of truth."

[Michael Allen]

Maybe I missed this, but in addition to the clothing and holster issues of the students. How many assailants would be half as trained as the instructor? Even by their own stats, the odds of being hit is slim by an attacker. This is typical ABC anti-gun stuff.

But is still a valid point to think about keeping with training. Just not for their purpose.