|
Why were pre-ban features not normal on the Ruger 10/22? There's a very significant reason. Actually, the reason certain things were banned was because Ruger guns do not have them. What am I talking about?
Look at the market for Ruger's guns. Look at how they're designed, and what they compete with. The Mini-14 competes with the AR-15, the Mini-30 competes with the SKS and AKs, the Ruger 10/22 competes with, well, lots of guns.
But... Look at the ARs and AKs, then look at the Minis. See the difference? Being based on the M1 Garand/M14, the Minis are able to exist without a pistol grip, whereas pistol grips are integral to the design of ARs and AKs.
It was Ruger who lobbied for the assault weapon ban. In fact, it could have been worse, ie NO features instead of only one, which is how ARs are still in production. And no detachable magazines either. Look at the design of the Minis... They're the only kind out there that can load from the top, except for the SKS. Certainly the only 223. From what I've read, Ruger wanted to switch the Mini to a fixed mag, ban the detachable mags, and be the only 223 auto on the market. Now there are ARs that use a fixed mag, but it's ugly to load.
And now you know... The Rest of the Story.
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
|