Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2005, 12:49 AM   #1
Firearm Enthusiast
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
Millitary dumping the Baretta92 !

check this link out, I heard about it from my friend and G&G member in OCS school.

"Dump the M9 and pack a 45"
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 06:48 AM   #2
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

Cover Story

Back to the future
Soldiers have been saying it for two decades — get rid of the M9 and go back to a .45 caliber. Now Army weapons developers want to do just that. (For subscribers only)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 07:34 AM   #3
Firearm Zealot
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Too Dang Hot, Arizona
Posts: 4,288
Key here is the weapons developers want it but it might boil down to who (and what companies) Congressmen and Army officials have a financial interest in and "loyalty" to.

I side with the .45 ACP.
__________________
"It confuses me how some people can vigorously go against the 2nd. Amendment and still call themselves patriotic"-me
Dale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 08:13 AM   #4
PUKHA DAWG
 
Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia, just outside of Washington D.C.
Posts: 3,788
About time. I doubt they'll go with the 1911, wonder which .45 will get the nod?
Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 04:02 PM   #5
Firearm Zealot
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Too Dang Hot, Arizona
Posts: 4,288
I sure hope NOT Glock!

Thinking maybe Springfield.
__________________
"It confuses me how some people can vigorously go against the 2nd. Amendment and still call themselves patriotic"-me
Dale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 04:39 PM   #6
Firearm Aficionado
 
silentknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,118
Quote:       Originally Posted by Dale
Thinking maybe Springfield.
I highly doubt this, I don't see the armed forces going to .45 GAP, or at least I hope not. I would love to see xd's in our servicemen and women's hands, but only if they came out with a 45 ACP platform, and I don't see that happening.

Would a H&K USP be plausible?
__________________
Sic Vis Pacem Parabellum

Last edited by silentknight; 07-07-2005 at 04:42 PM.
silentknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 05:17 PM   #7
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

wish they'd pick domestic contractors
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 07:05 PM   #8
Firearm Enthusiast
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
I was told that the article mentioned 3 manufacturers and I can only remember 2
One was Sig and the other H&K. The third was I think Hi Point..... Just kidding I cant remember the third.
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 07:48 PM   #9
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:       Originally Posted by BigJake
I was told that the article mentioned 3 manufacturers and I can only remember 2
One was Sig and the other H&K. The third was I think Hi Point..... Just kidding I cant remember the third.
Kimber ? they've made some 1911A1 pistols for the USMC
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 08:04 PM   #10
Firearm Zealot
 
colt45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Occupied Territories of New York (Buffalo)
Posts: 2,898
acctualy some units have allready been aproved to purchase and carry the ruger 45.
__________________
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity"
-Sigmund Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanalysis

"If guns cause crime, all of mine are defective."
- Ted Nugent

"Self-defense is Nature's eldest law."
-John Dryden
colt45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2005, 10:20 AM   #11
Firearm Zealot
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Okeefenokee
Posts: 1,613
Quote:       Originally Posted by colt45
acctualy some units have allready been aproved to purchase and carry the ruger 45.
That's what I've heard.
Thrawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2005, 01:52 PM   #12
Firearm Enthusiast
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
I heard that the gun to replace the m9 is going to be decocker and first shot double action second single... thats the only features I know of.
Excluding special operation units I think the "cocked and locked" days are over. Sad to say.
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2005, 01:58 PM   #13
Firearm Zealot
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Okeefenokee
Posts: 1,613
If those are the specs. Ruger has what they are looking for.



Thrawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2005, 02:06 PM   #14
Firearm Zealot
 
Thrawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Okeefenokee
Posts: 1,613
Gauge/Caliber: .45 Auto
Capacity: 8 Rounds
Finish: Blued
Stock/Grip: Black Synthetic
Barrel Length: 4 1/2"
Rear Sight: Fixed
Other Features: Manual Safety / Firing Pin Block
Suggested Retail Price: $ 525.00
Miscellaneous: N/A


Ruger Manual Safety P-Series pistols offer the following features:

** A manual ambidextrous safety that, when engaged, prevents firing unless the lever is returned to the "fire" position.

** Ruger Camblock design that reduces felt recoil and dissipates stress.

** High visibility front and rear sights.

**P95PR and KP95PR models feature a new, textured frame and Picatinny-style accessory rail.

** P345 pistols feature a new frame with checkered grip areas, front-strap, and back-strap, loaded chamber indicator, magazine disconnect, and internal lock.

** KP345PR and P345PR models include a frame-integral Picatinny accessory rail.

**All P-Series pistols are designed to be easily maintained and can be field-stripped into five major subassemblies for cleaning, without the need for special tools.

** 15 - round models not available in all states and locales. 10 - round models are available where required to meet state and local regulations limiting magazine capacity.
Thrawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2005, 02:47 PM   #15
Firearm Zealot
 
Sniper[MI]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Future 51st state, "New Hope"
Posts: 3,796
Eh, just use a bigger caliber....

BTW, Uncle Sam? I will take all the M9's off yer hands for free. They will be checked and re checked, then sold with 40% of the profits to be returned to the US Military.....with 17 or 18 of the newest kept on hand for personal use/collection...

I am also in aposition to take all the 9mm ammo off your hands for use in the same fashion.......
__________________
FNUH!
Sniper[MI] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2005, 03:33 PM   #16
Firearm Enthusiast
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
I am a fan of ruger autos all the way, I have a customized p90 that I shall not part with. And I know first hand that they can shoot right with an H&K.
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2005, 12:24 AM   #17
Firearm Enthusiast
 
pipsqueak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southwest Washington State
Posts: 78
What's the point? It'll just cost a lot of money to switch. Is there some
reason the .45 is better? I thought they were about equally effective with
good ammo. Even if the .45 is a better stopper with that ball stuff the
military might have to use. 15 shots of 9mm has the potential to go further
than 9 shots of .45. Right? I thought that's what the military has pistols for anyway. For when they run out of rifle ammo, or when the rifle malfunctions.
They can hold more shots of 9mm. I understand the .45 is usually preferred by
consumers like us for personal defense and home defense to the 9mm, but
I think more shots is probably more useful for most military situations. If weight
and bulk weren't an issue they would probably just carry a second rifle as
backup.
pipsqueak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2005, 02:18 AM   #18
Firearm Enthusiast
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
The 9mm potential and Mag capacity vs. the .45s potential and Lack of Capacity.
This is always a debate that both the 9mm fans and the .45 fans consider frivolous.
I can see Both sides of the issue, but to post my opinion I would rather tote 3-10 round mags full of Full weight .45 fmj, than 3-15 round mags of 9mm fmj. (considering they pick a decent .45)

afterthought "Heck a back up rifle would be pretty cool too if I could handle the weight."
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.

Last edited by BigJake; 07-13-2005 at 02:21 AM. Reason: Afterthought
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2005, 07:14 AM   #19
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:       Originally Posted by pipsqueak
What's the point? It'll just cost a lot of money to switch
the Government doesn't care how much of your money it spends
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2005, 11:07 AM   #20
Firearm Enthusiast
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South
Posts: 184
Heck if its my money they're spending I hope it goes to a .45 .
__________________
Don your goggles if you wish to resist.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
baretta92, dumping, millitary

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West