Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-07-2007, 12:56 PM   #21
Firearm Enthusiast
 
billt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 218
What find almost laughable is when Bush decided to put the Guard on the Border, they were unarmed! Talk about nonsense. Bill T.
billt is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 03:57 PM   #22
Banned
 
troy2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 14,552
He also said they wouldn't be patrolling

Quote:       Originally Posted by billt View Post
What find almost laughable is when Bush decided to put the Guard on the Border, they were unarmed! Talk about nonsense. Bill T.
Supposedly, they were supposed to take over other miscellaneous duties to free up the border agents to do more patrolling, since the agents are the professionals.

But I've read at least one account of the Guard coming face-to-face with an armed party, and falling back. Were they patrolling at the time, or doing something else along the border?
troy2000 is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 04:34 PM   #23
Chief Troll B' Gone
 
Midas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 4,598
This is ludicrous
__________________
NRA Life Member
God Bless the United States Military
Midas is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 09:06 PM   #24
Firearm Zealot
 
Rave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa,Florida.
Posts: 10,796
Cool

Saw on the news that,after 13 years,the homeland security is planning on filling in a tunnel under the Mexican border.
Rave is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 08:50 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Rufus Rhastus J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: West, Central Florida, Third World America
Posts: 6,342
Gee, i hope those illegals won't be inconvenienced too much.
__________________
"They cannot be trusted.....The Romulans (our politicos) are without honor." Worf
Rufus Rhastus J is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 11:42 PM   #26
Firearm Aficionado
 
frozentorso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East Texas
Posts: 593
I live here and have followed the case. The van bumped Hernandez as it drove off. If the van had been coming at hernandez, he would have been justified in shooting to protect his life. The problem is the van was leaving the scene and Hernandez was in NO LONGER IN DANGER, and under these conditions officers are forbidden to fire their weapons. He made a poor decision on the spur of the moment, but should of been reprimanded or fired at most. I probably would have emptied my mag into the van, and pretty soon you'll see the good folks of South Texas take the law into their own hands.
__________________
"I'm your huckleberry. Thats just my game!"
frozentorso is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 12:26 AM   #27
Banned
 
troy2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 14,552
That's seems to be the problem with Sutton

Quote:       Originally Posted by frozentorso View Post
I live here and have followed the case. The van bumped Hernandez as it drove off. If the van had been coming at hernandez, he would have been justified in shooting to protect his life. The problem is the van was leaving the scene and Hernandez was in NO LONGER IN DANGER, and under these conditions officers are forbidden to fire their weapons. He made a poor decision on the spur of the moment, but should of been reprimanded or fired at most. I probably would have emptied my mag into the van, and pretty soon you'll see the good folks of South Texas take the law into their own hands.
He takes what should have been disciplinary matters, and literally makes federal cases out of them. And he's apparently willing to give the store away to any "victim" who'll testify against an LEO or Border Agent, no matter what said victim might be guilty of himself.

I wish he showed the same zeal when it comes to prosecuting drug-runners and coyotes...

Someone told me Hernandez' defense was that he thought they were putting it in reverse and coming back at him. I haven't looked his case up; is it true he claimed that, and if so could it hold water?
troy2000 is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 09:05 AM   #28
Firearm Zealot
 
Rave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa,Florida.
Posts: 10,796
Cool

Hold water? Our border and our security remind me of a seive,and a seive won't hold water!
Rave is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 09:27 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
Rufus Rhastus J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: West, Central Florida, Third World America
Posts: 6,342
these poor unfortunates.
__________________
"They cannot be trusted.....The Romulans (our politicos) are without honor." Worf
Rufus Rhastus J is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 03:17 PM   #30
Firearm Aficionado
 
frozentorso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East Texas
Posts: 593
I havent heard that one. I heard they hauled !!!!!, the mirror on the drivers side clipped him, he drew and shot, and they jumped a curb trying to skeedaddle. Backing up was never mentioned. He clearly screwed up, but it was taken much to far. Understand, we have a very large population of illegal immigrants here. Some local economies depend on them. Others are sympathetic to them. Some want them to re-take Texas. Theres never a shortage of agendas, accept the correct one.
__________________
"I'm your huckleberry. Thats just my game!"
frozentorso is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 03:42 PM   #31
Firearm Zealot
 
Calvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,072
The people involved in the prosecution of this officer should spend a week doing Hernandez's job. When a vehicle takes off and part of the vehicle makes contact with you, that's a deadly threat. What would have happened had the mirror "clipped" the officer and he fell backwards into the lane of traffic and got hit? How do you know the perp isn't going to try to back up on you? There's a ton of things to consider in such a situation and, unfortuantely, there's only about 1 second to process what is going on.
I hate armchair quarterbacking. You get asked why you didn't do it "this" way and you give an answer. The retort is you should have done it "that" way. It's so much easier to analyze after the incident is over and from the safety of a plush office.
Sorry, but I can empathize with this officer and I feel he's been wrongly accused. I, personally, feel he did the right thing. It's funny, though. The shots went into the vehicle and one of the (illegal) occupants suffered a hit from fragments. No innocent bystanders were hit and all the rounds were accounted for. (Good shooting, if you ask me.) Like Troy said, why has it gone from administrative to legal?
__________________
If you don't like cops, call your local crackhead for help next time!
Calvin is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 04:14 PM   #32
Retired Moderator
 
Oxford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gladstone, Missouri
Posts: 15,705
I'm with you on your stand, Calvin. Second guessing in a calm environment isn't the luxury the LEO had when he made his on the spot decision. We've all had incidents which required immediate decisions...and maybe later second guessed ourselves how we might have done something differently, if we could do it over.

But...as you stated, a perp caused the LEO to take action, and a stray round fired was still the result of the perp's action. I place no blame on the officer.
__________________
"If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right".
Oxford is online now  
Old 03-09-2007, 07:42 PM   #33
Banned
 
troy2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 14,552
Speech given by Congressman Ted Poe before the House in Washington, DC - January 10, 2007

Deputy Gilmer Hernandez

Mr. Speaker, in the small border town of Rocksprings, Texas, where drug smugglers and human smugglers sneak across the Rio Grande into America, lone Deputy Sheriff Gilmer Hernandez was on patrol. In the stillness of the vast night, a speeding Suburban runs a red light. Deputy Hernandez, 25, stops the vehicle, but suddenly, without warning, the vehicle takes off. Deputy Hernandez says the vehicle tried to run him down. The lawman fires several shots, one of which shoots out the rear tire, just like in the movies.

The vehicle stops, and eight or nine illegals jump out and take off running into the sagebrush. One illegal had a minor injury from a bullet. The U.S. Government rounds up six or seven of the illegals and, guess what, prosecutes Deputy Hernandez, claiming he recklessly discharged his firearm and uses the illegals as witnesses against the lawman during a trial.

Citizens of his town are mad. One said, ``Our deputy's in jail for doing his job.''

Mr. Speaker, another example of how the Federal Government is more concerned about people illegally invading America than it is about the men who protect America. Once again, our government is on the wrong side of the border war.

And that's just the way it is.
troy2000 is offline  
Old 03-09-2007, 09:31 PM   #34
Firearm Zealot
 
Rave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa,Florida.
Posts: 10,796
Cool

"Big business(money) trumps everything."
We are slideing ever faster down the slippery slope.
Rave is offline  
Old 03-10-2007, 08:13 AM   #35
Senior Member
 
Rufus Rhastus J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: West, Central Florida, Third World America
Posts: 6,342
I agree with Troy...."Once again, the government is on the wrong side of the border war." I'm wondering, does Rave's comments have the "telling" answer as to why?
__________________
"They cannot be trusted.....The Romulans (our politicos) are without honor." Worf
Rufus Rhastus J is offline  
Old 03-10-2007, 01:47 PM   #36
Firearm Enthusiast
 
billt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 218
The Republicans want to exploit the cheap labor. The Democrats want to "import poverty" to assure them the votes to create big government. The only people who want the illegal invasion stopped are the citizens. And they don't count for much these days. Bill T.
billt is offline  
Old 03-10-2007, 02:44 PM   #37
Firearm Zealot
 
Rave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa,Florida.
Posts: 10,796
Cool

Let's have a big amen for that!
Rave is offline  
Old 03-11-2007, 12:00 AM   #38
Firearm Zealot
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Minnesotah
Posts: 2,424
We could get all the people we can and stand in 24 hr shifts and watch the fence. I would like to see them stop an army of "concerned citizens" from doin the job the border police seem to be provented from doing. BUT I'm thinking that it would scare the border police more than the illegal immagrants, though. Just a temptaion. Not something we could do, I think.
SKS NOOB is offline  
Old 03-11-2007, 12:27 AM   #39
Firearm Aficionado
 
frozentorso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East Texas
Posts: 593
I think you guys are missing the point. His life was no longer in danger. Police cant just start shooting at fleeing vehicles. He broke the rules! But I do believe it was blown out of proportion for political reasons. As I stated earlier, he should have reprimanded or fired, not jailed.

I believe the Minutemen are still active on the Texas border.
__________________
"I'm your huckleberry. Thats just my game!"
frozentorso is offline  
Old 03-11-2007, 10:54 AM   #40
Senior Member
 
Rufus Rhastus J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: West, Central Florida, Third World America
Posts: 6,342
Ditto that BillT
__________________
"They cannot be trusted.....The Romulans (our politicos) are without honor." Worf
Rufus Rhastus J is offline  
Closed Thread

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
cop, feds, seeking, texas, years

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West