Old 06-04-2007, 05:32 AM   #1
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Scout_recon05's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
Thoughts on Model 710

Hey guys, I was thinking about getting the Remington M710 as my next rifle. If anyone has used to own one or done work with them, please leave your thoughts.
Scout_recon05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 05:45 AM   #2
Chief Troll B' Gone
 
Midas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 4,598
Its the worst rifle to ever exist, you would be much better off getting a Savage
__________________
NRA Life Member
God Bless the United States Military
Midas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 05:49 AM   #3
Firearm Enthusiast
 
mike dakota's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: northern great plains
Posts: 48
Reviews my friend! Here's just one!
Remington M-710

Issue: Summer 2001
Price: $425
Contact: (800-243-9700)
Editor's CommentsCreepy trigger. Bolt is very sticky; no feeding problems, however. Not very impressive. Groups strung out. If there’s a rule that cheap guns have to be homely (and vice versa), the 710 qualifies on both counts. Inexpensive it is and pretty it ain’t. But beauty, they say, is in the eye of the beholder, and that may go for pocketbooks as well, because for just over four bills a big-game hunter can be ready to go afield with this bolt-action rifle in .270 or .30/06 with a 3-9 Variable-X Bushnell scope already mounted as part of the deal.When rumors about Remington’s bargain-price, big-game rifle began spreading on the outdoor life Web site last year, there was considerable speculation that it would be either a no-frills version of its M-700 or a return of the M-788. The 710 is neither. It is, in fact, perhaps the most radically innovative sporting arm in generations. For example, the bolt doesn’t back into the receiver the way we’re used to. Instead, the three bolt lugs lock directly into the barrel, basically eliminating the weight and costly machinery normally associated with traditional rifle receivers while at the same time providing a powerful lockup. In fact—are you ready for this?—there isn’t a receiver in the traditional sense. Instead, the bolt is held in alignment by a nylon molding inside a steel encasement which, in turn, preserves Remington’s “three rings of steel” cartridge head enclosure. The bolt on our sample 710 fit snugly—perhaps too snugly—in the bolt guide, causing it to drag when pushed both forward and back. This, along with the creepy trigger, was the most common complaint of the OL test team. Presumably, the self-lubricating bolt guide will loosen with wear and use. The four-round detachable box magazine loaded and functioned easily, and accuracy ranged from 1.488 inches to 4.250 inches for five-shot groups at 100 yards, with 150-grain Remington Core-Lokt bullets shooting best.
SpecificationDescriptionINTENDED PURPOSEBig gameOVERALL SCOREFairCALIBER TESTED.30/06 Sprg. (.270 Win.)BARREL/OVERALL LENGTH (IN.)22 in./42.5 in.SIGHTSNoMETAL FINISH/STOCKBlueTRIGGER PULL WEIGHT5 lb.WEIGHT AS DELIVERED (LB.)7 lb., 2 oz. (8 lb. With scope)
mike dakota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 06:06 AM   #4
Firearm Zealot
 
lefty o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mn
Posts: 8,348
it is a pile of junk.
lefty o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 09:47 PM   #5
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,185
The savages I've tried weren't any better.
I would look for a good used rifle than spend money on either the savage or 710. my.02
HEMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 10:25 AM   #6
Firearm Zealot
 
Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 2,294
I'd agree and say go with a Savage, or better yet, spend a bit more and get a Remington M700.
Bravo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 10:52 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North New York State.
Posts: 1,236
Quote:       Originally Posted by 338WinMag View Post
Its the worst rifle to ever exist, you would be much better off getting a Savage
Thanks 338WinMag,you took my response.
JoeLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 06:15 PM   #8
Chief Troll B' Gone
 
Midas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 4,598
Quote:       Originally Posted by HEMI View Post
The savages I've tried weren't any better.
I would look for a good used rifle than spend money on either the savage or 710. my.02
Explain how they arn't any better, the action on the Savage seems to be more solid, and the barrel on the Savage is screwed into the receiver, as opposed to being pressed into the receiver, like the 710. I have no earthly idea how you can even claim that the Savage and the 710 are in the same class. Now, granted, you may have looked at an older Savage, in that case, it probably wasn't much better then the 710, but the modern Savages, are excellent rifles, and very accurate.
__________________
NRA Life Member
God Bless the United States Military
Midas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 06:32 PM   #9
Firearm Aficionado
 
Johnny_Revolver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,402
Blog Entries: 1
I`ll wade in: I looked for the last oh, 9 months or so for a new rifle. I handled quite a few in that time. I thought about a Tikka, tried a few, the bolt action cycled OK, the 3 CDL Remchesters I tried were pretty nice, the CZ Varmint was cool, but the Savages I tried were butter smooth. It was like putting a nicely run in old column shift car into second gear. Off the shelf. Mine was nice out of the box, after cycling maybe 10 times and a suggestion of tetra gun grease, it`s lovely

I`m fairly sure, that the 710 has never been offered for sale in this country, word travels fast.
__________________
<(*)(((()><

Last edited by Johnny_Revolver; 06-09-2007 at 06:35 PM.
Johnny_Revolver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 09:55 PM   #10
Retired Moderator
 
BattleRifleG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 11,751
I passed on a 710 at Gandere Mountain for $199 on blowout. Think I should have bought it as fodder for a freakish conversion. Maybe next time.

Handled a 770 there and didn't see any single advantage over the 710.
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
BattleRifleG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 10:02 PM   #11
Firearm Zealot
 
Full MeTal Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 2,013
upsidedown it spells OIL

omfg: Hey! My 1000th post! wow a milestone

:
__________________
Guns and cameras don't mix

Last edited by Full MeTal Jack; 06-09-2007 at 10:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Full MeTal Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 10:51 PM   #12
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,185
338 the cheap feel, accuracy, stocks. If you like em cool they are just not for me.
HEMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 10:59 PM   #13
Firearm Zealot
 
Full MeTal Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 2,013
Thanks for the feedback. I told a bud about one in the pawn shop. Sheep! .270. He was interested. I talked to several other peole about the 710. Called my friend up, "Hope you didnt buy that?"
"Nope"
Thanks for the thoughts on the 710.
__________________
Guns and cameras don't mix
Full MeTal Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
710, model, thoughts

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West