Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2007, 10:46 PM   #21
Firearm Aficionado
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 603
Still no replies to this???? I would have thought someone would stand up for the mighty Ruger 10-22. lol
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2007, 10:59 PM   #22
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 42
The venerable 10-22 is a fun gun. Easily modified and great fun with a 50rd mag for just whiling the afternoon away at the range or out in the field but its not the most accurate 22 rifle that can be had. You're right, a bolt action is the way to go for max accuracy. Of course, if you want a semi-auto and accuracy, there are still more accurate 22 rifles that can be purchases than the 10-22, sometimes for less money too.
sammoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 12:17 AM   #23
Firearm Aficionado
 
DWARREN123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: BETWEEN TN & KY
Posts: 1,129
For just target I would go with the .17 MachII. More expensive ammo but more accurate, the .22lr is less expensive and more for hunting (in my opinion).
I have CZ's in both and am happy with them.
__________________
Have a nice day!
DWARREN123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 12:30 PM   #24
Firearm Aficionado
 
jashoffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,025
It really depends on the 10-22. A 10-22 with a bull barrel and nice scope will put the rounds just about anywhere you want them up to 100 yards. Now there is a lot of cheap .22lr ammo out there and you get what you pay for. If you want to get the most out of your gun spend a few extra bucks and get good match ammo. I would speculate that a 10-22 could shoot nearly as accurately as any any bolt action and the difference would not be noticable to the average shooter. The .17 has it's own problems. Not that I don't like the round, cause I do but it is effected by the wind more than the .22lr
__________________
"I don't go shooting without my guns and they don't go shooting without me!"

Member NRA
jashoffa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 01:10 PM   #25
Firearm Aficionado
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 603
Quote:       Originally Posted by DWARREN123 View Post
For just target I would go with the .17 MachII. More expensive ammo but more accurate, the .22lr is less expensive and more for hunting (in my opinion).
I have CZ's in both and am happy with them.
May i ask y u would go with the 17 MachII when the 22lr with good quality bullets such as CCI Stingers gets almost the same accuracy and buffets the wind better? Where i live the difference in ammo price between the !7 Mach II and the 22 Lr is about 3-1. One box of 4-5 doller CCI ammo verses the 10-15 doller MAch II.
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 04:48 PM   #26
Firearm Enthusiast
 
CalvinMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6
I bought the CZ in 17mach2 first...totally fell in love with it, like it way more than my heavy barrel Savage in 17HMR. Then I found a matching 452 in 22LR at BassPro that had gorgeous wood making it a twin to the 17...my plastic was out in a flash...both are 1 holers and I couldn't be happier

P.S. Natchez Shooting Supply, Midsouth shooting Supply and Graf & Sons all have great sales on Mach2 ammo and Graf doesn't charge shipping!

Last edited by CalvinMD; 01-27-2008 at 04:51 PM.
CalvinMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 05:03 PM   #27
Firearm Zealot
 
billy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: a secret lab on the shores of lake titicaca
Posts: 23,063
glad to hear it!
if you are happy i am happy!
__________________
"I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."
billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 05:59 PM   #28
Firearm Aficionado
 
Magnumsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 603
Sounds like a sweet combo, but do you actually get much better performance with a 17mach2 than a 22lr with stingers?
__________________
Cartridge Group
Like to discuss cartridges? Join HERE!
Magnumsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 08:16 PM   #29
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
I currently own a CZ 100 in 9mm. I'm not sure what to think of the unusually long and heavy trigger pull yet. I was told by a CZ rep that it has been discontinued. I don't know what the selling point of it was but it lacked basic options like night sights,different finishes, and a magazine capacity over 12 for 9mm. I think this could have been a better gun if the folks a CZ listened more to its consumers. Plus the rail could only accomadate the CZ laser sight which I was told is pricey$$.I like the ergonomics but it could use a little better checkering pattern and a beefier grip for bigger hands like mine. Anyone own one ? Please tell me what you think.

Last edited by Mr.Marcus; 05-20-2008 at 08:23 PM.
Mr.Marcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:25 AM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
I,m paying $6.90/50 for the 17M2, still not to bad for 50 rounds.
Tulsa1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:32 AM   #31
Firearm Aficionado
Typing Test Champion, Fishing the Sea Champion, Mini KickUps Champion, KickUps Champion, Mouse Race Champion
 
tippmann7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Attica, Ohio
Posts: 1,232
im paying $13 for 50 rounds in my .17hmr, sorry for being off topic but just to compare
__________________
DEWmocracy, the few, the proud, the GREEN
tippmann7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 01:01 AM   #32
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 740
Quote:       Originally Posted by Magnumsrule View Post
Sounds like a sweet combo, but do you actually get much better performance with a 17mach2 than a 22lr with stingers?
I have wondered this myself but never contested the two at the range. I know the 17M2 is very accurate and carries a mighty punch at 100yds. M2 will easily reach out past 100.

Now I have something to explore next time at the range.
Zen900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 01:07 AM   #33
CERTIFIABLE GUN NUT
 
GlockMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 14,042
Personally, if this rifle will primarily be for target shooting, go with .22lr. The .17 Mach 2 isn't all that cheap and you'll get a lot, a ton more target shooting in with .22lr.
Example. .17 Mach 2 box of 50 at Bass Pro is $7.49. A box of 50 .22lr at Bass Pro, $3-$4 bucks. I just picked one store for the $7.49, if not cheaper, then the .17 Mach 2 costs.

http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/st...004000_400-4-2

http://www.basspro.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10151_-1_10001_28631____SearchResults
__________________
"My next door neighbors two dogs have created more shovel ready jobs then Obama has." - Gary Johnson

Last edited by GlockMeister; 08-06-2008 at 01:14 AM.
GlockMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 10:42 PM   #34
Firearm Aficionado
 
Deep13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 753
Cost and availability strongly favor 0.22LR. Unless you have some specific need for the faster, tiny rounds, .22 is the obvious choice.

I saw a few of those at a local shop. Very nice.
Deep13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
ammo, mach

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West