Old 01-06-2008, 02:15 PM   #1
Firearm Enthusiast
 
mk70ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 70
.22 Ammo suggestions for NRA Bullseye matches

After a few years hiatus from .22 bullseye matches, I am getting back into it. I have a Ruger Mk III stainless with a red dot sight and some custom target grips. Any suggestions for a starting point regarding the ammo?
mk70ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:20 AM   #2
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Powderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 314
Welcome back to the firing line!

I also started out with a Ruger; mine was a Mk II--they are good, sound, accurate pistols.

They also have a distinct advantage, in that they will shoot regular ammo as well--or in some cases, BETTER--than the high dollar offerings.

Mine shot best with Winchester T22; that has become somewhat hard to find; a close second, though, was good old Federal American Eagle AE4022, with the 40 grain solid bullet. Believe it or not, mine also loved CCI Stingers!!!
Powderman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 05:24 AM   #3
Firearm Aficionado
 
tbonecpk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego Cal
Posts: 589
I would try out either the Wolf Match ammo or Ely heck even Federal Gold Medal works too. I had a kimber model 82 government (granted it's a single shot target rifle) that loved those ones. especialy the Gold Medals.
__________________
"Speak softly but carry a big stick"
-Teddy Roosevelt


tbonecpk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 06:55 AM   #4
Firearm Enthusiast
 
mk70ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 70
Thanks guys.
__________________
Life is a contact sport, play hard.
mk70ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 08:23 PM   #5
Firearm Enthusiast
 
FutureMarine9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 177
my shooting instructor told me that sub sonic ammo is more accurate...weather there's any truth to that i don't know but it's just a suggestion
FutureMarine9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 09:17 PM   #6
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Powderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 314
Quote:       Originally Posted by FutureMarine9 View Post
my shooting instructor told me that sub sonic ammo is more accurate...weather there's any truth to that i don't know but it's just a suggestion
Your instructor is correct.

This has to do with the transition from supersonic to subsonic. While the projectile is supersonic, it is in front of the sound/pressure wave. When it makes the transition, the sound wave catches up to it and whacks the bullet in the butt. This disturbs the stability of the projectile.

This is most noticeable when shooting light projectiles over a distance--and is a primary reason why high-power shooters favor the heavier projectiles that will hold their velocity for longer distances.

However, at bullseye pistol distances--25 and 50 yards--high velocity ammunition will not go subsonic. There is, though, the matter of recoil and recovery.

Finally, the .22 bullet can only be pushed so fast before leading will occur.
Powderman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 09:59 PM   #7
Firearm Enthusiast
 
dscrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 53
I shoot BR50 matches with an old Remington model 37 (Remington's answer to the Winchester model 52) that was made in 1953. I have a Redfield model 3200 24x scope on it and I REGULARLY beat guys that are shooting $2000 Anschutz rifles with $1000 glass on them.

As far as ammo, the best advice is to gather an assortment of ammo from different manufacturers in different bullet weights and velocities, and shoot some groups from a solid rest (or in your case a machine rest if you can get ahold of one). It's amazing how much groups will vary between different ammo in a specific rimfire weapon. My 37 loves the expensive Lapua Midas M stuff the best. It will hold .20 inch at 50 meters all day with it. I have other .22s that shoot Remington yellow jackets almost as accurately. just spend some time at the range and you will find your load. Good luck!
dscrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 11:52 PM   #8
Firearm Zealot
 
SilverRun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,090
If you can find the Wolf match, get it. Most accurate I have found. It is made in Germany - not Russia.
SilverRun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 06:24 PM   #9
Firearm Aficionado
 
sniper1958's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 500
Eley Tenex (Redbox) works best for me!
sniper1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 10:45 PM   #10
Firearm Enthusiast
 
hunterspistol's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Texas Panhandle
Posts: 18
I like any full 40 grain 22 lr, don't discount CCI Green Tag.
hunterspistol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 10:20 AM   #11
Firearm Zealot
 
Cyrille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 2,065
Question: Is High Volocity sub or super sonic?
Cyrille is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 04:57 AM   #12
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Powderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 314
It is most assuredly supersonic.

.22 High Velocity usually clocks at 1200 fps or more. Now, at bullseye distances (25 and 50 yards) it might not be a bad thing. However, it would work best in a compensated pistol, IMHO.

I use standard velocity ammunition myself; I think the best bang for the buck is CCI standard velocity.
Powderman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
ammo, bullseye, matches, nra, suggestions

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West