Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-15-2008, 07:42 PM   #1
Firearm Zealot
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,262
This was on Lou Dobbs tonight.

A Wisconsin father of three with several years active military, and honorable discharge, and still serving in reserves with no criminal recored etc was charged and convicted in court of feloniously transferring a machine gun


What did he do?
He loaned his legally owned 20 year old Olympic Arms Semi Auto AR15 to a friend, and while shooting the gun at the local gun club the gun malfunctioned and fired off 3 rounds in full auto before it jammed.

What happend? The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, local PD SWAT Team, and sheriffs dept. crashed through his homes door confiscated all of his perfectly legal guns, and then charged him with illegally transferring a machine gun. And he was convicted.

He has since lost his job as a DI in the army reserves due to his felony conviction.

WHAT?!?!?!?!

Is the NRA gonna do something?
Drill instructor convicted after rifle jams
2nd Amendment Under Fire, What’s next? Justmytruth’s Weblog
TACAV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 08:25 PM   #2
Firearm Enthusiast
 
thomasbrooks07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 253
thats really messed up I feel for the guy. How did he get in trouble for that if hes military isnt it legal for him to have full auto weapons? I am a civi still and I prefer bolt action rifles so I know little to nothing about class 3 firearms and the licenses. I hope that a judge apeals that ruling cuz thats just wrong what happend to that man and his family.
thomasbrooks07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 08:51 PM   #3
CERTIFIABLE GUN NUT
 
GlockMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 14,042
Yes, a load of pure horse pucky and cow pies. What I'm not understanding, is if it has been proven that a part was worn or broken, and was shown to be the cause of the full auto malfunction, why did they still pursue this against him? Why didn't his lawyer call to the witness stand, someone from Olympic Arms to verify this 1986 recall and to verify it can happen, how it can and so on? Lots of hinky stuff to this.
One has to wonder, is there more that meets the eye here? Did/does someone simply have it out for this guy or what? I mean, people do have common sense still and I just can't believe that if a gunsmith and tests done has found a worn or broken part, recalls notices and so on, why couldn't someone see this was all an accident and/or a misunderstanding?

You gotta feel for the guy, his career (well the one he had anyhow) and his family.
__________________
"My next door neighbors two dogs have created more shovel ready jobs then Obama has." - Gary Johnson

Last edited by GlockMeister; 03-15-2008 at 09:14 PM.
GlockMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 09:21 PM   #4
Firearm Zealot
 
ArkansasHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Buck Snort, Arkansas.
Posts: 20,563
What can we do to help him ?
__________________
IN GOD WE TRUST
NRA MEMBER
ArkansasHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 09:40 PM   #5
Firearm Zealot
 
Deersniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 8,642
Malfunction of the govt.

I guess that's supposed to scare us. I don't think it's going to work. We need to identify that judge and the prosecutor and put their names all over the Internet to expose this crap. We need to post all antis on a world wide list and pull up their public records and post them for all to see. If we don't we'll end up like the monks in China.
Deersniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 10:19 PM   #6
Firearm Zealot
 
LarryO1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Johnson Creek, WI
Posts: 6,431
Quote:       Originally Posted by ArkansasHunter View Post
What can we do to help him ?
... this is the Wisconsin I've been telling you guys about, completely anti-gun political leadership and this guy is the fall-guy for their political anti-gun agenda.

Maybe a petition will help? I have no idea ...
__________________
You don't scare me! Work on it!
LarryO1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 01:28 AM   #7
Firearm Enthusiast
 
F1609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 209
theres has to be some kind of proof on the AR-15 itself, atleast they said AR-15 instead of M-16, that proves he did not do anything.
F1609 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 08:42 AM   #8
Firearm Zealot
 
LarryO1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Johnson Creek, WI
Posts: 6,431
Quote:       Originally Posted by F1609 View Post
theres has to be some kind of proof on the AR-15 itself, atleast they said AR-15 instead of M-16, that proves he did not do anything.
I wonder if this same outcome would have happened anywhere else but this anti-gun Democrat (Doyle) lead state?

There would have to be proof within the trigger group... a worn part that would allow that to happen. For those familiar with the M60 machinegun ... a worn sear would cause what is called a "runaway gun" ... a full auto fire until the ammo supply is eaten. My guess is that something similar happened in this case... and the anti-gunners and politicians within Wisconsin are eating this guy alive for something that was not his fault.

Frankly, this man should be apologized to, exonerated and cleared of any wrong doing. In addition, he should be given his job and life back too.

Clear and simple, the Govt. fuc**d up.
__________________
You don't scare me! Work on it!
LarryO1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 11:30 AM   #9
Firearm Zealot
 
.22hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 4,228
Being an armorer during my years, 1970-72, I know very well of runaways in M-60's.I had 6 of them I pulled maintenance for my artillery battery.If it happened, and you were quick enough, you could break the belt apart,LOL.
.22hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 01:00 PM   #10
Firearm Zealot
 
billy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: a secret lab on the shores of lake titicaca
Posts: 23,061
One has to wonder, is there more that meets the eye here? Did/does someone simply have it out for this guy or what? unquote


everytime i see one of these type of posts i wonder.
i know unfair things happen but a good lawer would have pounced on this and got it dismissed so fast!
what else did this guy do?
i dont think we got the whole story once again.

people get gun charges brought upon them all the time in america.
you know what?
most of the time they are GUILTY and need to be in prison.
__________________
"I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person I'm preaching to."

Last edited by billy; 03-16-2008 at 01:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 01:17 PM   #11
Firearm Zealot
 
ezearln's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 5,065
I agree with Billy on this one I think theres a whole lot more to this than what we have gotten... In my 20+ years as a Armorer and instructor I never did have an M60 runaway but I do know it can and does happen... I also know that certain parts do wear and break that can cause this in any semi auto firearm. I wonder if the guy would have be charged had this happened in say a ruger 10/22???
__________________
"You can have my Freedom when I'm done with it!"
ezearln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 04:54 PM   #12
Firearm Zealot
 
LarryO1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Johnson Creek, WI
Posts: 6,431
Exclamation Anti-gun Wisconsin politicians...

Quote:       Originally Posted by .22hustler View Post
Being an armorer during my years, 1970-72, I know very well of runaways in M-60's.I had 6 of them I pulled maintenance for my artillery battery.If it happened, and you were quick enough, you could break the belt apart,LOL.
Exactly... and this was due to a worn sear in the trigger group that caused the runaway gun.

AR-15/M-16's can have the same problem(granted, they are constructed differently) and obviously it did happen... especially given how old and worn the gun was.

This is Liberal Democrats gone wild (Doyle) here in Wisconsin... a state that everybody knows is anti-gun within Madison and Milwaukee. No wonder why the people of this state avoid Madison and Milwaukee...
__________________
You don't scare me! Work on it!
LarryO1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 05:17 PM   #13
Firearm Zealot
 
knightRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: you know where
Posts: 3,792
booooooooooooo
__________________
God doesn't give rights. Men have to fight for them.
knightRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 07:16 PM   #14
Firearm Enthusiast
 
soonerborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 409
I have been following this case for a while now. The ATF tested the gun and found it to be "NOT A MACHINEGUN". The agent in charge ordered a retest done and instructed the lab to use soft primer ammo and presto its a machine gun. The malfunction noted by the ATF is "hammer follow", yes they know its a malfunction. No, they dont care. The DA prosecuting the case specifically argued that by fed law "ANY GUN THAT FIRES MORE THAN ONE BULLET IS A MACHINEGUN, REGARDLESS IF ITS INTENTIONAL OR A MALFUNCTION".

Yes, this guy is getting railroaded. No, there is not some big secret that once exposed will prove this guy to be a criminal. He was charged and convicted on one count "illegal transfer of a machinegun". This has went to trial and the jury convicted so there is no secret except all the evidence that would have cleared this guy that the judge and DA tossed out, excluded and refused to give to the guys lawyer. They wouldnt even let him or anyone else examine the gun, only ATF can examine it.
soonerborn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 09:10 PM   #15
Some People's kids....
 
texnmidwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South east Wisconsin
Posts: 12,163
I hope they appeal. I also hope it goes all the way to the supreme court. In Wisconsin they way the laws are worded if you are carrying a simple pocket knife it can be considered a concealed weapon and you can technically be charged.

Wisconsin needs a new Governor. I can't wait to vote against him again.
__________________
Dedicated to SwedeSteve, Arkansashunter and Ezearln. Rest in peace my friends.
texnmidwest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 09:33 PM   #16
Firearm Zealot
 
LarryO1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Johnson Creek, WI
Posts: 6,431
texnmidwest... us, along with other Wisconsin residents will ban together and take Doyle out of office. That clown has been nothing but consistent in voting against the 2nd Amendment rights of Wisconsinites.

We at least have a chance with J. B. Van Hollen... he's a pro-gun Republican.
__________________
You don't scare me! Work on it!
LarryO1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2008, 11:32 PM   #17
CERTIFIABLE GUN NUT
 
GlockMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 14,042
While the whole thing is sad, what's been forgotten, is this guy put in his years in the service. Now, not only due to this has he lost his job, but they'll more then likely take his pension away.

Why is it, everyone can see this is wrong, that the guy is being screwed, yet no one can help. What if this was one of us? Someone we knew?
__________________
"My next door neighbors two dogs have created more shovel ready jobs then Obama has." - Gary Johnson
GlockMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008, 02:16 AM   #18
Firearm Zealot
 
LarryO1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Johnson Creek, WI
Posts: 6,431
Exclamation

Quote:       Originally Posted by GlockMeister View Post
While the whole thing is sad, what's been forgotten, is this guy put in his years in the service. Now, not only due to this has he lost his job, but they'll more then likely take his pension away.

Why is it, everyone can see this is wrong, that the guy is being screwed, yet no one can help. What if this was one of us? Someone we knew?
I will fire off a letter to Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen on his behalf. Given the fact I'm just a nobody who happens to reside in Wisconsin... maybe others, to include other Wisconsin residents, can do the same.

Realistically, what else can we do? Will the NRA or GOA help? Are there military organizations that can help? Anybody?
__________________
You don't scare me! Work on it!
LarryO1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008, 09:28 AM   #19
Firearm Zealot
 
ezearln's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 5,065
Let me see if I got this right, this guy was tried and convicted in a Wisconsin STATE Court on a "Federal Law" charge of illegally "Transferring" an "Automatic Firearm" seems to me the logical next step is to drag the resident Assistant U.S. Attorney into it as well as the federal Court to get this ridiculous mess overturned. Does anyone else here smell the stink of a skunk in the henhouse? Here's a question for everyone ""Why was a case involving a suspected violation of a FEDERAL LAW, allowed to be handled by a local yokel DA and tried in a State Court instead of being handled by the ATF, US Marshals and the U.S. District Court for Wisconsin, who would have been the proper authority???"

And I wonder why the Judge supressed evidence that would have shown that the weapon was NOT a machine gun by ATF itself and would have cleared this man.

There is more at work here that just an assinine Judge and DA gentle readers.

Corrections folks I didn't get all the correct info, seems as if this was tried at the federal level, but somehow if I read it right the Judge failed to follow a precedent set in a much earlier case (1999) which would have made it possible to completely dismiss this case...
__________________
"You can have my Freedom when I'm done with it!"

Last edited by ezearln; 03-17-2008 at 10:01 AM.
ezearln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008, 12:06 PM   #20
Firearm Zealot
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,262
In the very least, whether if this guy was "shady" or not, Or if someone really wanted to "stick it too him" for whatever reason,

Im looking at this case as a dangerous court precedent for future gun rights cases.
TACAV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
felon, gun, malfunctions

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West