[Rattle'em up]

Quote:       Originally Posted by Full MeTal Jack

Brother Bob Does your club have a web site? I'm a member of Bayou Rifles in Houston. Glad to see another competitor. index bayourifles.org I have yet to shoot at 1000, but I did pull targets. We boased the 2006 1000 yard F-class state champion. Carl D. Yes sir , lot of varibles at long range. Light, wind, mirrage. Still need a sighter shot.

I think you left out a few variables like humidity, rifle canting, barometric pressure, elevation and temperature. I forgot to add Moon phases and tidal movement.

Personally I like .33 magnum calibers and scopes with Hubble telescope technology.

[Brother Bob]

Quote:       Originally Posted by Rattle'em up

I think you left out a few variables like humidity, rifle canting, barometric pressure, elevation and temperature. I forgot to add Moon phases and tidal movement. Personally I like .33 magnum calibers and scopes with Hubble telescope technology.

You forgot the mold spore count!

[sc928porsche]

Perhaps its just me, Although I can shoot well enough, there have been times that I have been slightly off target. I havn't completely missed yet, but came close to it a couple of times.

I hate woulded game and for that reason I am very fond of cannons. I have seen too many wounded animals because someone used a small caliber rifle at a long distance (250yds and up). They leave absolutely no margin for error.

If you have to use those small calibers (243 and smaller) on deer, then keep them within 100 yds where you can keep the impact within 1".


For hunting game at ranges of 500yds+ I suppose my weapon of choice would be a 105 loaded with HE.

[wirehunt]

Quote:       Originally Posted by Rattle'em up

I almost forgot when all else fails listen to our "brand new member" Pucker-up. Read between the lines Pucker-up the jokes on you.

I laughed reading this........your not really an old hand yourself Rattles


In my opinion 243 and 270 are both sinkers......

[Brother Bob]

Quote:       Originally Posted by wirehunt

I laughed reading this........your not really an old hand yourself Rattles In my opinion 243 and 270 are both sinkers......

What's a "sinker"??????

[wirehunt]

Something you tie onto your fishing line and throw to the bottom of the sea.

[alaskamonte]

Quote:       Originally Posted by sc928porsche

Perhaps its just me, Although I can shoot well enough, there have been times that I have been slightly off target. I havn't completely missed yet, but came close to it a couple of times. I hate woulded game and for that reason I am very fond of cannons. I have seen too many wounded animals because someone used a small caliber rifle at a long distance (250yds and up). They leave absolutely no margin for error. If you have to use those small calibers (243 and smaller) on deer, then keep them within 100 yds where you can keep the impact within 1". For hunting game at ranges of 500yds+ I suppose my weapon of choice would be a 105 loaded with HE.

Short and sweet folks, if ya shoot them in the butt they are wounded!

If you have to use those small calibers (243 and smaller) on deer, then keep them within 100 yds where you can keep the impact within 1".

Huh? With deer it's minute of grapefruit nd with moose it's minute of paper plate!

The Alaska Champion Outfitter has used the .243 for all Alaskan Game, it's shot placement not caliber!

[nathangdad]

. . . . has a very well known long distance capability and even more so
if you have a medium weight or perhaps varmit/target barrel on your action.

[ACfixer]

Quote:       Originally Posted by lefty o

my advice is to do alot of practice with whatever it is your using now. most centerfire rifles are quite capable of cleanly taking deer at 300yds. the problem is, most hunters are not. practice, practice, practice.

I could think up ways to word it for hours and not be able to say it any better than that.

[Kismet]

Uh...

well now.

I'm know I'm old. I know I'm a meat hunter. I have a fair sense of my own limitations.

I went through the six pages of this thread, just waiting for someone to suggest...

er...

moving closer to where the deer are.

If it is your land, stick a few straw bales out there in August or September. If that is the path the deer take, they will become accustomed to the bales...heck, they may even seek them out.

No bales...some plywood pieces, darkened up, will work. Even a piece of farm equipment might do. Get there before the deer. Wait. Shoot.


and Bob's yer uncle.

Be safe.

[ACfixer]

Quote:       Originally Posted by Kismet

If it is your land, stick a few straw bales out there in August or September. If that is the path the deer take, they will become accustomed to the bales...heck, they may even seek them out.

Or maybe a nice pile of berries to bait them in even closer?

[Troy]

Quote:       Originally Posted by lefty o

correct, it is not unethical if you are capable of doing it. however as ive said many times, most hunters dont belong taking shots at 100yds, much less further.

i got friends that i feel unethical if i give them anything more than a water pistol to shoot. lol. i agree completely with what you said. the "ethical range" changes with the shootes talents.

[Kismet]

Quote:       Originally Posted by ACfixer

Or maybe a nice pile of berries to bait them in even closer?

Baiting is illegal in Wisconsin. I don't find the laws here onerous, so I make life simpler by just following them.

But if it is legal in your area...bait away. Heck, put some corn or something on an old jacket...see if they get used to human scent.

Have fun. Be safe.

[wirehunt]

Quote:       Originally Posted by Kismet

Uh... If it is your land, stick a few straw bales out there in August or September. If that is the path the deer take, they will become accustomed to the bales...heck, they may even seek them out. and Bob's yer uncle. Be safe.

But we all don't live and shoot in the US..........



nathangdad, I know of two people getting rid of their 25/06 after a long range shoot in the last six months

[Brother Bob]

I have always tried to get as close as possible, but you have some folks on this forum that like to crow about shooting animals at .75 miles or more. We never hear about the misses or wounded animals, do we????? That's right, they never miss. LOL!

[lefty o]

kismet, depending on where in wisconsin you are, baiting is LEGAL.

[sell33]

Quote:       Originally Posted by Rattle'em up

For pure knock down power at long range .300WBY with a lazer rangefinder scope muzzlebrake for recoil and a bipod. This is easily a 1000yrd deer rifle. Oh yes, and a magic 8ball.

Lol my uncle uses one of these for deer in MI (used to anyway hasn't in awhile). I don't know how far his shots were, I am guessing fairly short because i believe it is heavily wooded, but he said the deer he shot with that lifted all 4 feet off the ground lol.

Quote:       Originally Posted by Brother Bob

Your right. They would then take those rifles and accurize them. I couldn't remember if it was a Remington or a Winchester. That was when sniping was in it's infancy.

Model 70 winchester i believe. I read a book on him lol. My uncle (different uncle they all hunt) owns a marine corps Model 70 30-06. Very plane jane rifle, but interesting because it is vietnam era.

[samuel]

Quote:       Originally Posted by billy

i hate agreeing with you cap'n tool but this guy seems a little harsh for his 1st post or his 1000th for that matter. when folks throw distances around like 1000 yds. does anybody have a clear idea how far that REALLY is? it is hard to make out a man that is moving at 1000 yds. can you see the target line? it is 1000 yds. away.

No.But I can hear it. sam.

[Brother Bob]

Quote:       Originally Posted by samuel

No.But I can hear it. sam.

You told me you shot by sense of smell! LOL!

[wirehunt]

The smell of gun powder!!!! LMAO