Depends on what you want. The yugo is heavier, 1.6mm reciever, and is one of Century's better AK's. Lancaster is one of the better ak builders and would have better quality than the yugo. Can't go wrong either way. I have 2 century yugos and a polish lancaster. They are all great. It comes down to you wanting an underfolder or not in my opinion.
I love my underfolder but like snowman said the cheek weld kinda sucks. I would rather have a fixed buttstock in a combat situation but the underfolder is fun for just playing around with. And you look cool doing it. I'm happy with my decision on the underfolder. but i understand now why them d*mn iraqi's cant hit me. But my m240g sure does a number on them
__________________
Happiness is found in a belt-fed weapon. Who said you can't buy happiness?
www.ohioguntrader.org
I would go with the yugo, if your wanting to stick with 7.62x39? my rational for this as opposed to the magazines that protrude from the AK? low profile able to crawl, I know some in here will argue with a false sence of security that quanity is more important then quality!!!!
Well guys I just got back from a local gun show with an Arsenal SLR-95 AK47, bulgarian with standard stock. 2-30rd and 1 40rd mags... how did I do? How much do these run?
Well guys I just got back from a local gun show with an Arsenal SLR-95 AK47, bulgarian with standard stock. 2-30rd and 1 40rd mags... how did I do? How much do these run?
See my reply to your other post in 
