Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-04-2008, 06:27 PM   #1
Firearm Enthusiast
 
acarpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark (I wish)
Posts: 495
H&R Vs. Springfield!!!

Ok.
So I wasn't really planning on buying a Garand in the very near future, but I just happened to go into the local gunshop and see one with a gorgeous stock and i think I have the bug. I would have bought that one, but it seems that he was a bit overpriced, since it had been rebuilt and refinished. (considering CMP prices)

I am considering springing for one of the correct grade CMP Garands...
So, H&R or SA???
The H&R is 25 bucks more, but thats of no object to me.
It says that the Springfields are between 5.4 and 5.8 million numbered anyway. I would really like to keep my collection strictly WWII production years, but I figured its hard to find one thats all correct, in good shape, and the like. And I can always get one of those later.

Anyway, back to my point: Should I get a H&R or Springfield?
acarpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 09:09 PM   #2
Firearm Zealot
 
Dookiebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: America's North Coast
Posts: 2,416
Neither of your options are WWII production. All of the HRAs I have seen recently were very nice. I would spend the extra $25.
Dookiebutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 09:14 PM   #3
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Ben Hartley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jaffrey, New Hampshire
Posts: 223
H&R or Springfield?

Carpenter:

Harrington and Richardson (H&R or HRA) rifles are all post WWII production. They were made ca. 1952-1956 to supply rifles for the Korean "police action."

Springfield Armory made M1 Rifles during WWII of course, and the top serial number for 1945, according to Scott Duff's The M1 Garand" OWNER'S GUIDE is in the 3,880,000 range.

HTH

Ben Hartley
Ben Hartley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 09:26 PM   #4
Firearm Zealot
 
lefty o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mn
Posts: 8,720
also, any rifle you get from the CMP will be a mixmaster. buy one anyways, 95% of people dont know the difference.
lefty o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 05:54 AM   #5
Firearm Zealot
 
Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,069
Correct grades and Collectors (when available)are not mixmasters. They have all correct parts for the era built with correct stocks but are post war. All other rifles are mixmasters.
Orlando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 10:16 AM   #6
Firearm Enthusiast
 
acarpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark (I wish)
Posts: 495
That brings up another question I had...
When the parts are "correct for the era" does that mean that these rifles come as they were from the factory for the most part? And would be all H&R for example?
Thanks for the responses
acarpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 11:53 AM   #7
Firearm Zealot
 
Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,069
A Correct Grade SA or HRA will have all SA or HRA parts correct for that era as shipped from the factory
Orlando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 10:01 PM   #8
Firearm Zealot
 
lefty o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mn
Posts: 8,720
they are still mixmasters, just pieced together.
lefty o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 05:30 AM   #9
Firearm Zealot
 
Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,069
You are wrong. Correct and collectors are not mixmasters. When grading rifles if they happen to see one piece out of place they may or may not change it to make it a Correct Grade but CMP does not "build" rifles to make them correct. Collectors are as found.
Orlando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 09:36 PM   #10
Firearm Zealot
 
lefty o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mn
Posts: 8,720
changing parts to make one correct is not "as found".
lefty o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 06:51 AM   #11
Firearm Zealot
 
Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,069
I'm not here to argue with you but you need to do some research. Once again (I'll type real slow so maybe you can understand) When grading rifles if they happen to see one piece out of place they "may or may not change it "to make it a Correct Grade . CMP does not "build" rifles to make them correct but if there is a small piece out of place it is possible they will change it. This does not make it a mixmaster.A mixmaster is a riflke with all different manufacture of parts or parts not correct for the era of the serial number. Collectors are as found, correct from the day they left the factory .Understand?
Just how many Correct Grades do you have in your safe?

Last edited by Orlando; 06-07-2008 at 06:56 AM.
Orlando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 09:34 AM   #12
Firearm Zealot
 
oldjarhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 7,495
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:       Originally Posted by lefty o View Post
also, any rifle you get from the CMP will be a mixmaster. buy one anyways, 95% of people dont know the difference.
And 99.9% of that 95% don't really care.
It's the look, the feel, the shoot-ability, and the history.
oldjarhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 05:23 PM   #13
Firearm Zealot
 
lefty o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mn
Posts: 8,720
orlando, if they are changing pieces to make them correct, they are building/assembling rifles . another fact, 99% of M1 do not have their original parts, that makes them all mixmasters. oh, i typed this really slow so you could comprehend it!
so what exactly does having a number of correct grades in your safe prove? yep, i dont have 1, just a lowly NM M1.
lefty o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 06:09 PM   #14
Firearm Zealot
 
Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,069
You are absolutly right , most Garands dont have original parts except for the Collector Grades and Correct Grades,fact. Another fact, changing a small part on a otherwise completly correct Garand to make it 100 percent correct does not make it a mixmaster. Another fact, yes all WW11 Garands sold through CMP are mixmasters. Another fact ,I am talking about Post War Correct Grades and Collector Grades. Another fact, these are not mixmasters
Slideshow of HR Correct - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
1167682449.pbw - Slideshow - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Orlando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 10:36 PM   #15
Firearm Zealot
 
lefty o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mn
Posts: 8,720
i disagree. about the only M1's out there that are not mixmasters are the british lend lease rifles, as most of those do contain all original (to the rifle) parts. the rest are mixmasters with few exceptions. its kinda like saying a 63 vette with a replacement engine block is all correct.
lefty o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 05:45 AM   #16
Firearm Zealot
 
Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,069
A Corvette with a Ford engine not correct but a Garand with a trigger changed ? Maybe you should also read the descripton alittle more carefully.

"Collector Grade rifles have all original parts as they came from the manufacturer. Wood will have a few handling marks and minor dings and scratches. Stocks have the appropriate inspector's cartouche"
"Correct Grade rifles will have all correct parts for the date of manufacture "

This is straight from the director of operations at CMP
"we don't assemble rifles to make them correct. If we are inspecting a rifle and the only thing keeping it from being correct is a small part, and we have one of those parts handy on that particular armorer's bench - he 'may' make it correct, or he may not - judgement call. We don't second guess the armorers.
'

CMP also has "unissued" all completely correct , in original wrap, unmolested , non mixmaster Garands on their auction site from time to time

Last edited by Orlando; 06-08-2008 at 07:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Orlando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 09:46 AM   #17
Firearm Enthusiast
 
USAF_462/2W1X1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Goldsboro, NC
Posts: 387
Ladies, I really didn't mean to interrupt the pissing contest... But can I just say, Orlando that both rifles look... well... WOW! My keyboard is covered with drool, those are the first pics I have seen of a corect grade, actually they are the first pics I have seen of any CMP M1! (Close up pics I mean) I am waiting on my M1 through the CMP now but it is Service grade, so I know it won't look like those, but I guess I better start saving my money again!!!

Last edited by USAF_462/2W1X1; 06-08-2008 at 01:37 PM.
USAF_462/2W1X1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 10:52 AM   #18
Firearm Enthusiast
 
acarpenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark (I wish)
Posts: 495
Hey USAF,
I am right there with ya buddy. Just got my M1 carbine in the mail a couple weeks ago and now I have garand-itis BAD. I wanna save up my money for a correct while they still have them
acarpenter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 01:30 PM   #19
Firearm Zealot
 
Orlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,069
No pissing contest just stating facts. Your Service Grade will be a mixmaster as Lefty calls them. Dont expect perfect finish, they will show wear but will be a great shooter. It may come with a new Boyds stock or USGI. Post pics when you get it
Orlando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 02:08 PM   #20
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Poteet, Texas
Posts: 1,267
Any Garand that was issued will not have all original parts. About every 3 months the operating rod and spring were changed out. At least the USMC ones were.
__________________
Aim real good we're nearly out of ammo.
Mike Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - Gun Forum Community > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
handr, springfield

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.




Recent Discussions

Proud Sponsors


NRA NETWORK



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West